Cases

Arterburn, J. This appeal consists of two cases which were consolidated for trial purposes. The first in order of time was filed by the appellants, Clifford Johnson, et al., against three individuals, William A. Norwood, William T. Norwood and James Howard Norwood to abate a nuisance and for a permanent injunction against the same. Thereafter Southside Ready Mix Concrete, Inc., (which succeeded to the interests of the three Norwo

CUDAHY, Circuit Judge. Esmark, Inc. petitions for review of an order of the National Labor Relations Board (the “NLRB” or “Board”) finding Esmark guilty of violations of sections 8(a)(3) and 8(a)(5) of the National Labor Relations Act (the “NLRA”), 29 U.S.C. section 158(a)(3), (a)(5). The Board’s order is reported at 289 N.L.R.B. No. 51 (June 29, 1988). We grant Esmark’s petitio

666 F.2d 524 BAGGETT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, Birmingham, Alabama,Tri-State Motor Transit Company, Joplin, Missouri,and C. I. Whitten Transfer Co.,Huntington, West Virginia, Petitioners,v.UNITED STATES of America and Interstate Commerce Commission,Respondents. Nos. 81-7248, 81-7550 to 81-7552 and 81-7619 to 81-7621. United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit.

65 F.Supp. 740 (1946) KING v. ORDER OF UNITED COMMERCIAL TRAVELERS OF AMERICA. Civil Action No. 471. District Court, W. D. South Carolina, Spartanburg Division. May 24, 1946. Johnson, Johnson & Foster, of Spartanburg, S. C., and Jesse W. Boyd, of Spartanburg, S. C., for plaintiff. Haynsworth & Haynsworth, of Greenville, S. C., and Rainey and Fant, of

OPINION OF THE COURT Rose, J. In 2004, respondents Preserve Associates, LLC, Big Tupper, LLC, Tupper Lake Boat Club, LLC and Nancy Hull Godshall, as trustee of respondent Oval Wood Dish Liquidating Trust (hereinafter collectively referred to as the developers), submitted an application to respondent Adirondack Park Agency (hereinafter the APA) for conceptual approval of the proposed Adirondack

OPINION OF THE COURT Rose, J. In 2004, respondents Preserve Associates, LLC, Big Tupper, LLC, Tupper Lake Boat Club, LLC and Nancy Hull Godshall, as trustee of respondent Oval Wood Dish Liquidating Trust (hereinafter collectively referred to as the developers), submitted an application to respondent Adirondack Park Agency (hereinafter the APA) for conceptual approval of the proposed Adirondack

*59 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS SAYLOR, District Judge. This lawsuit involves a dispute between the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and a federally recognized Indian tribe concerning regulatory jurisdiction over civil gaming on Indian lands on Martha’s Vineyard. The Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah) and related entities have t

DUPONT, C. J. The issues of this appeal by the plaintiff are whether the trial court improperly (1) set aside a jury verdict awarding the plaintiff damages for breach of contract and rendered judgment notwithstanding the verdict, (2) refused to award prejudgment interest on the jury’s award of damages, and (3) excluded the plaintiffs evidence on lost profits. Other issues raised by the defendants’1 cr

503 F.Supp.2d 490 (2007) OBG TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC., Plaintiff, v. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SPACE & MISSION SYSTEMS CORP., as successor in interest to TRW, Inc., and Best Friends, Inc., Defendants. No. 3:06cv1850 (MRK). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. August 30, 2007. *491 *492

2022 WI 64 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2022AP91 COMPLETE TITLE: Richard Teigen and Richard Thom, Plaintiffs-Respondents-Petitioners, v. Wisconsin Elections Commission, Defendant-Co-Appellant, Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee,

2022 WI 64 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2022AP91 COMPLETE TITLE: Richard Teigen and Richard Thom, Plaintiffs-Respondents-Petitioners, v. Wisconsin Elections Commission, Defendant-Co-Appellant, Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee,

TUTTLE, Circuit Judge: These are petitions by Baggett Transportation Company and other protesting present carriers to set aside the grant of' common carrier authority to transport explosives to the seven applicants for licenses by the Interstate Commerce Commission. The petitioners attack the Commission’s orders on the ground that there was insufficient factual basis in the record to permit the Commission t

OPINION BROOK, Judge. Case Summary Appellant-plaintiff the Estate of Eiryk T. Heck ("the Estate"), by and through Donald Heck, the personal representative of the Estate, appeals the trial court's order dismissing its wrongful death action or in the alternative granting summary judgment in favor of appellees-defendants (collectively, "defendants") Raymond Stoffer ("Raymond"),1</

531 S.E.2d 836 (2000) DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Plaintiff, v. Joe C. ROWE and wife, Sharon B. Rowe; Howard L. Pruitt, Jr., and wife, Georgia Pruitt; Robert W. Adams, Trustee; Aline D. Bowman; Frances Bowman Bollinger; Lois Bowman Moose; Dorothy Bowman Abernethy and husband, Kenneth H. Abernethy; Martha Bowman Caudill and husband, Jack Caudill; Appalachian Outdoor Advertising Co., Inc. (formerly Appalachian Poster Advertising Company, Inc.), L

CARDAMONE, Circuit Judge: This appeal, arising originally from the disposal of hazardous substances at two Connecticut landfills, Beacon Heights and Laurel Park, requires us to determine whether defendants accused of generating and transporting hazardous substances deposited at the two landfill sites might be liable under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) to contribute to the

56 F.Supp.2d 104 (1999) SOUTH PORT MARINE, LLC, Plaintiff, v. GULF OIL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP and BOSTON TOWING & TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, L.P., Defendants. No. CIV. 98-20-P-H. United States District Court, D. Maine. July 26, 1999. *105 Daniel G. Lilley, Daniel G. Lilley Law Offices, David J. Perkins, Perkins, Olson & Pratt,

754 F.Supp. 960 (1991) B.F. GOODRICH COMPANY, et al. v. Harold MURTHA, et al. v. RIDSON CORPORATION, et al. Civil No. H-87-52 (PCD). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. January 8, 1991. *961 Louis R. Pepe, David E. Rosengren, James W. Oliver, Bernard A. Pellegrino, Pepe & Hazard, Hartford, Conn., for B.F. Go

Opinion BORDEN, J. The dispositive issue of this appeal is whether the plaintiffs, a Connecticut municipality and *316its mayor, have standing to assert the various causes of action that they have alleged against the defendants, who are various firearms manufacturers, trade associations and retail sellers.1 The pl

AMENDED ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT LEWIS M. KILLIAN, JR., Bankruptcy Judge. This matter is before the Court on Co-rus Construction Venture, LLC’s (CCV) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment which seeks a declaratory judgment that defendants Jonathan R. Adkins, et al. and defendants Peter Bell, et al. (collectively, the “Ori

404 So.2d 511 (1981) Daniel E. CAMBRE v. The TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, John W. Dussouy and Company, Inc., and XYZ Insurance Company. No. 12027. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. July 30, 1981. Rehearing Denied October 20, 1981. William M. Detweiler, New Orleans, for plaintiff-appellant. Jones, Walker, Waechter, Poitevent, Carre