Cases

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR., United States District Judge On February 18, 2019, a coalition of sixteen states filed suit against Defendants *936Donald J. Trump, in his official capacity as President of the United States; the United States; the U.S. Department of Defense ("DoD"); Patrick M. Shanahan, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of

An appropriate Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

OPINION PER CURIAM: For the third time, we are called upon to assess the legality of the President’s efforts to bar over 150 million nationals of six designated countries 1 from entering the United States or being issued immigrant visas that they w

OPINION John A. Gibney, Jr. United States District Judge Trump Tight, LLC (“Trump”),1 opened a restaurant and lounge in Sussex County, Virginia, and, until its closing, butted heads with Sheriff Raymond R. Bell. During Trump’s short-lived tenure in Sussex County, Sheriff Bell—through his deputies, including Lieutenant Vincent B. Givens—allegedly forced Trump to hire and pay of

TRAXLER, Circuit Judge, concurring in the judgment: I concur in the judgment of the majority insofar as it affirms the district court’s issuance of a nationwide preliminary injunction as to Section 2(c) of the Executive Order against the officers, agents, and employees of the Executive Branch of the United States, and anyone acting under their authorization or direction, who would attempt to enforce it, beca

TRAXLER, Circuit Judge, dissenting: I agree with my dissenting colleagues insofar as they hold that the plaintiffs lack standing to assert their claims under the Immigration and Nationality Act. Accordingly, I do not reach the merits of those claims. With regard to the plaintiffs' claim that Proclamation No. 9,645 likely violates the Establishment Clause of the United States Constitution, I believe they have sta

OPINION 1 PER CURIAM: We are asked to delineate the statutory and constitutional limits to the President’s power to control immigration in this appeal of the district court’s order preliminarily enjoining two sections of Executive Order 13780 (“E02” or “the Order”), “Protecting the Nation From Fore

NAOMI REICE BUCHWALD, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This case requires us to consider whether a public official may, consistent with the First Amendment, "block" a person from his Twitter account in response to the political views that person has expressed, and whether the analysis differs because that public official is the President of the United States. The answer to both questions is no. Our analysis proceeds as

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

24-644 Carroll v. Trump UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2024 (Argued: June 24, 2025 Decided: September 8, 2025) Docket No. 24-644 E. JEAN CARROLL, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee,

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ALISHEA KINGDOM, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 1:25-cv-691-RCL DONALD J. TRUMP, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION The plaintiffs in this dispute are inmates in the custody of the Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) who have been medically diagnosed with gender dysphoria

People v Trump (2025 NY Slip Op 04756) People v Trump 2025 NY Slip Op 04756 Decided on August 21, 2025 Appellate Division, First Department MOULTON, J. Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GWYNNE A. WILCOX, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 25-334 (BAH) v. Judge Beryl A. Howell DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States and

25-1113 Mahdawi v. Trump United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit _____________________________________ August Term 2024 Argued: May 6, 2025 Decided: May 9, 2025 No. 25-1113 _____________________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JANE JONES, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 1:25-cv-401-RCL PAMELA BONDI, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, et al., Defendants. ORDER On February 28, 2025, Plaintiffs filed an Amended Complaint [ECF No. 35] adding fou

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA REBECCA KELLY SLAUGHTER, et al., in their official and personal capacities, Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 25 - 909 (LLA) v. DONALD J. TRUMP, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION More than a century ago, Congress created the Federal

People v Trump (2023 NY Slip Op 03440) People v Trump 2023 NY Slip Op 03440 Decided on June 27, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 22-SP-745 DONALD J. TRUMP, et al., APPELLANTS, V. E. JEAN CARR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JOHN H. PAGE, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 25-18 (TJK) DONALD J. TRUMP, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM John H. Page filed this action seeking to prevent Donald J. Trump’s impending inaugura- tion as president. As he has in prior litigation, Pa