Cases

577 F.3d 479 (2009) Bertram COOPER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, John E. Potter, as Postmaster General, Ronald G. Boyne, as Postmaster, Manchester, Connecticut Post Office, Defendants-Appellants, Full Gospel Interdenominational Church Inc., Dr. Philip Saunders Heritage Association, Inc., Sincerely Yours Inc., Intervenors-Defendants-Appellants, *480 Gary Chipman, Kimon Karath, Leslie Str

HILL, Senior Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs brought this action challenging the facial constitutionality of Alabama’s statute permitting non-sectarian, non-proselytizing student-initiated prayer, invocations and benedictions during compulsory or non-eompulsory school-related assemblies, sporting events, graduation ceremonies and other school-related events. Plaintiffs also challenged the statute as applied by the DeKalb County

15-3775 (en banc) Zarda v. Altitude Express, Inc. 15‐3775 (en banc) Zarda v. Altitude Express, Inc. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT _______________ August Term, 2017 (Argued: September 26, 2017 Decided: February 26, 2018) Docke

MADDOX, Justice (concurring in the result). This case involves a dispute over whether a State circuit judge can display a small hand-carved plaque of the Ten Commandments in the courtroom where he presides and whether he can invite local clergy members to offer prayer at the first assemblage of prospective jurors without violating the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States as applied to t

10 Cal.Rptr.3d 283 (2004) 32 Cal.4th 527 85 P.3d 67 CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SACRAMENTO, INC., Petitioner, v. The SUPERIOR COURT of Sacramento County, Respondent; Department of Managed Health Care et al., Real Parties in Interest. No. S099822. Supreme Court of California. March 1, 2004. Certiorari Denied October

43 F.Supp.2d 1163 (1999) William QUIGLEY and Dorothy Quigley a/k/a Dee Quigley, Plaintiffs, v. Saul F. ROSENTHAL, in his individual capacity and in his capacity as representative of the Anti-Defamation League, and the Anti-Defamation League, Defendants. Civil Action Nos. 94 N 2782, 95 N 2916. United States District Court, D. Colorado. March 11, 1999.

188 F.Supp.2d 904 (2002) John DOE, Individually; Mary Roe, Individually, and Freedom from Religion Foundation, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. Sue PORTER, Individually, and as Superintendent of the Rhea County School System; and Rhea County Board of Education, Defendants. No. 1:01-CV-115. United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Chattanooga. February 8, 2002.

STEPHEN A. HIGGINSON, Circuit Judge: In response to Google’s petition for panel rehearing, the opinion of the court is *216 sued on April 8, 2016, at 2016 WL 1397765, is withdrawn, and the following is substituted. The petition for rehearing is otherwise DENIED. Mississippi’s

985 F.Supp. 1062 (1997) Michael CHANDLER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Fob JAMES, et al., Defendants. No. CV 96-D-169-N. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. October 29, 1997. Steven Green, Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Washington, DC, Stephen L. Pevar, American Civil Liberties Union, Denver, CO, Elizabeth Joy Hubertz, Levi

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ______________ No. 21-2835 ______________ BRYAN DAVID RANGE, Appellant v. ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; REGINA LOMBARDO, Acting Director, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives __________

947 F.Supp. 1220 (1996) Robert JOHNSTONE, derivatively on behalf of National Income Realty Trust, a California business trust, and John Pedjoe, derivatively on behalf of Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc., a Nevada Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. FIRST BANK SYSTEM, INC., a bank holding company; First Bank National Association, a national banking association; a national banking association; First Bank (N.A.), a business entity; and FBS Business F

OPINION ROBERT B. KUGLER, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court upon the Clerk’s receipt of two submissions (docketed in this matter as Docket Entries Nos. 1 and 1-1). For the reasons expressed below, Plaintiffs’ submission docketed as Docket Entry No. 1-1 (made, seemingly, in lieu of their applications to proceed in this matter informa pauperis), will be denied without prej

'*, *, - ^*^ Case No. 04-14-00483-CV t .- "Y'v-- ..-"• .' \

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 00-2855 (JDB) LISA JACKSON,1 Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency, and the UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION This case presents a broad

LIVELY, Circuit Judge. This appeal is from a judgment of the district court which permanently enjoined the defendants from continuing the operation of an affirmative action program by the Detroit Police Department. The plaintiffs are an association of police officers and a number of white Detroit policemen who were passed over for pr

595 F.Supp.2d 8 (2009) GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. Lisa JACKSON,[1] Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency, and the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Defendant. Civil Action No. 00-2855 (JDB). United States District Court, District of Columbia. January 27, 2009. *10 Carter

631 F.Supp. 71 (1986) Peter M. BRANT, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES POLO ASSOC., Norman Brinker, W. Mackall Jason, S.K. Johnston, Jr., Donald V. Little, John C. Oxley, Stephen A. Orthwein, William Sinclaire, and George C. Haas, Jr., Defendants. No. 86-8093-CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. February 24, 1986. S. Skip Taylor, Miami, Fla., for plaintiff.</

508 U.S. 476 (1993) WISCONSIN v. MITCHELL No. 92-515. United States Supreme Court. Argued April 21, 1993. Decided June 11, 1993. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN *477 Rehnquist, C. J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. James E. Doyle, Attorney General of Wisconsin, argued the

538 U.S. 343 (2003) VIRGINIA v. BLACK ET AL. No. 01-1107. Supreme Court of United States. Argued December 11, 2002. Decided April 7, 2003. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA. *344 *345 *346 O'CONNOR, J., announced the judgment of t

ACCEPTED 15-25-00028-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 5/27/2025 4:56 PM NO. 15-25-00028-CV-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE