Cases

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA No. 263PA18-2 Filed 6 April 2023 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. CEDRIC THEODIS HOBBS, JR. On appeal pursuant to the Supreme Court’s decision in State v. Hobbs, 374 N.C. 345, 841 S.E.2d 492 (2020), after remand to the Superior Court, Cumberland County, for further proceedings. Heard in the Supreme Court on 8 February 2023. Joshua H. Stein, Atto

SUPERIOR COURT COMMONWEALTH v. JONATHAN THEBAUD Docket: 2284CR00385 Dates: May 24, 2024 Present: William F. Bloomer Justic

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 23-3430 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Jonathan Davis

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT BRIAN MECINAS; CAROLYN VASKO; No. 20-16301 DNC SERVICES CORPORATION, DBA Democratic National Committee; D.C. No. DSCC; PRIORITIES USA; PATTI 2:19-cv-05547- SERRANO, DJH Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. OPINION KATIE HOB

USCA4 Appeal: 20-4574 Doc: 127 Filed: 01/08/2024 Pg: 1 of 40 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-4565 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. DRICKO DASHON HUSKEY, a/k/a Drizzy, Defendant – Appellant.

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-1816 AMANDA RAKES, Administrator of the Estate of Amylyn Slaymaker and Next Friend to the minor children G.C. and M.C., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JONATHAN P. ROEDERER and ESTATE OF TE’JUAN JOHNSON, Defendants-Appellees.

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-1816 AMANDA RAKES, Administrator of the Estate of Amylyn Slaymaker and Next Friend to the minor children G.C. and M.C., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JONATHAN P. ROEDERER and ESTATE OF TE’JUAN JOHNSON, Defendants-Appellees.

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-1816 AMANDA RAKES, Administrator of the Estate of Amylyn Slaymaker and Next Friend to the minor children G.C. and M.C., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JONATHAN P. ROEDERER and ESTATE OF TE’JUAN JOHNSON, Defendants-Appellees.

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-1816 AMANDA RAKES, Administrator of the Estate of Amylyn Slaymaker and Next Friend to the minor children G.C. and M.C., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JONATHAN P. ROEDERER and ESTATE OF TE’JUAN JOHNSON, Defendants-Appellees.

KAREN R. BAKER, Associate Justice | Appellants Ray Hobbs, in his official capacity as Director of the Arkansas Department of Correction, and the Arkansas Department of Correction (collectively the “ADC”) appeal the decision by the Pulaski County Circuit Court finding that Act 139 of 2013 unconstitutionally violates the separation-of-powers doctrine found in ar-tide IV of the Arkansas Constitution because it

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-1816 AMANDA RAKES, Administrator of the Estate of Amylyn Slaymaker and Next Friend to the minor children G.C. and M.C., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JONATHAN P. ROEDERER and ESTATE OF TE’JUAN JOHNSON, Defendants-Appellees.

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-1816 AMANDA RAKES, Administrator of the Estate of Amylyn Slaymaker and Next Friend to the minor children G.C. and M.C., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JONATHAN P. ROEDERER and ESTATE OF TE’JUAN JOHNSON, Defendants-Appellees.

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-1816 AMANDA RAKES, Administrator of the Estate of Amylyn Slaymaker and Next Friend to the minor children G.C. and M.C., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JONATHAN P. ROEDERER and ESTATE OF TE’JUAN JOHNSON, Defendants-Appellees.

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-1816 AMANDA RAKES, Administrator of the Estate of Amylyn Slaymaker and Next Friend to the minor children G.C. and M.C., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JONATHAN P. ROEDERER and ESTATE OF TE’JUAN JOHNSON, Defendants-Appellees.

USCA11 Case: 22-10408 Document: 62-1 Date Filed: 01/24/2024 Page: 1 of 46 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-10408 ____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT THE DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL No. 18-15845 COMMITTEE; DSCC, AKA Democratic Senatorial Campaign D.C. No. Committee; THE ARIZONA 2:16-cv-01065- DEMOCRATIC PARTY, DLR Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. OPINION KATIE HOBBS, in her official capacity as Secretary of State of Arizona; MARK BRNOV

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 23a0221p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ L. W., by and through her parents and next friends, │ Samantha Williams a

03/17/2021 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE December 9, 2020 Session JONATHAN KING, ET AL. v. DEAN CHASE Appeal from the Chancery Court for Davidson County No. 16-0030-BC Ellen Hobbs Lyle, Chancellor ___________

276 Kan. 44 (2003) 71 P.3d 1140 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. PATRICK HOBBS, Appellant. No. 88,327. Supreme Court of Kansas. Opinion filed: July 11, 2003. *45 Jonathan L. Laurans, of Kansas City, Missouri, argued the cause and was on the brief for appellant. Michael A. Russell, assista

971 A.2d 796 (2009) 115 Conn.App. 89 Hilb ROGAL and Hobbs Company et al. v. UTA PETERS RANDALL. No. 29572. Appellate Court of Connecticut. Argued January 8, 2009. Decided June 16, 2009. *797 Sheila A. Huddleston, with whom were Glenn M. Cunningham and, on the brief, Lee A. Duval, Hartford,