Cases

263 P.3d 1078 (2011) 245 Or. App. 422 Saul RIVERA-MARTINEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Tommy C. VU, dba Pho Dalat; and Ninh V. Vuong, dba Pho Dalat, Defendants, and Donald M. Hooton; and Hooton Wold & Okrent, LLP, Defendants-Respondents. 080913379; A144371. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted January 26, 2011. Decided S

IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2025 ND 26 Access Independent Health Services, Inc., d/b/a Red River Women’s Clinic, on behalf of itself and its patients; Kathryn L. Eggleston M.D., on behalf of herself and her patients; Ana Tobiasz, M.D. on behalf of herself and her patients; Erica Hofland, M.D., on behalf of herself and her patients; Collette Lessard, M.D. on behalf of herself and her patients,

529 N.W.2d 879 (1995) Patrick T. SCHERLING, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Terry Lynn SCHERLING, Defendant and Appellant. Civ. No. 940362. Supreme Court of North Dakota. April 13, 1995. *880 James R. Brothers and Benjamin E. Thomas of Wold Johnson, P.C., Fargo, for defendant and appellant; argued by James R. Brothers. Jonathan

2015 WI 85 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2013AP296-OA & 2014AP417-W through 2014AP421-W & 2013AP2504-W through 2013AP2508-W COMPLETE TITLE: State of Wisconsin ex rel. Two Unnamed Petitioners, Petitioner, v. The Honorable Gregory A. Peterson, John Doe Judge and Francis D.

GRUENDER, Circuit Judge. A jury found James White, Jr., guilty of assault resulting in serious bodily injury in Indian country in connection with injuries suffered by his ten-month old son, A.W. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 113(a)(6), 1151, 1153(a). The district court then granted White’s motion for judgment of acquittal, concluding that no reasonable juror could find beyond a reasonable doubt that White intentionally assaulted A

281 N.W.2d 583 (1979) Beatrice Jeanne BRIDGEFORD, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. John Arthur BRIDGEFORD, Defendant and Appellant. Civ. No. 9618. Supreme Court of North Dakota. July 12, 1979. Rehearing Denied August 2, 1979. *584 Pancratz, Kruger, Wold, Yuill & Johnson, Fargo, for plaintiff and appellee; argued by

Jensen, Justice. [¶1] Ricky Berg appeals from a district court judgment dividing his and Darcy Berg's marital estate and awarding Darcy Berg spousal support. We affirm the district court's judgment. I [¶2] Ricky and Darcy Berg married in 1984 and separated in January 2016. The district court held a trial in June 2017 to determine the distributi

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-35440 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:22-cv- 00329-BLW v. STATE OF IDAHO, ORDER Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-35450 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:22-cv- 00329-BLW v. STATE OF IDAHO

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL JOHN R. TUNHEIM, District Judge. On August 30, 2013, ten-month-old A.W.1 , suffered serious injuries resulting in seizure and was ultimately airlifted from his local hospital on the Red Lake Indian Reservation to a larger hospital in Fargo, North Dakota. A.W. was alone with his father, Defendant James Wh

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON CLAIMS BASED ON PRECONCEPTION EXPOSURE SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment on claims based on preconception exposure is scheduled for a hearing on February 5, 2010. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1 (b), the Court determines that the matter is appropriate for resolution without oral argument, and VACATES the hearin

(2008) Julie RUTHERFORD, Plaintiff, v. Robert RUTHERFORD, Dean Kessel, and Elizabeth McGregor, Defendants. Case No. 1:06-cv-081. United States District Court, D. North Dakota, Southwestern Division. May 12, 2008. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT KESSEL'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT DANIEL L. HOVLAND, Chief

OPINION SUTIN, Judge. Hamaatsa, Inc. filed an action against the Pueblo of San Felipe seeking a declaration that a road, which crossed Pueblo property that was acquired in fee simple, was a state public road. In an interlocutory appeal, the Pueblo contends that the district court erred in denying the Pueblo’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction ba

116 F.Supp.2d 287 (1999) Jonathan HICKS, Plaintiff, v. John J. ARMSTRONG, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A.3:98CV1348AWT. United States District Court, D. Connecticut. September 30, 1999. *288 Robert Edward Lancaster, Jerome N. Frank Legal Services Organization, New Haven, CT, for Jonathan Hicks. Roberta S. Kirkendall, U.S. D

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER STEFAN R. UNDERHILL, District Judge. This case aggregates numerous antitrust actions brought by numerous plaintiffs in various districts against several interrelated pharmaceutical companies, all transferred to this Court by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. Under a Practice and Procedure Order (doc. # 37), the actions are consolidated into two groups

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 602 U. S. Part 1 Pages 556–571 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 20, 2024 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ

656 N.W.2d 686 (2003) 2003 ND 19 STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Johnathan HOLZER, aka Jonathon Holzer, Defendant and Appellant. No. 20020180. Supreme Court of North Dakota. February 19, 2003. Rehearing Denied March 26, 2003. *687 Chad R. McCabe, Bismarck, N.D., for defen

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MAGNUSON, Chief Judge. This matter is before the Court upon Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification and Plaintiffs’ Motion to Reserve Individual Injury and Damage Claims. A class certification hearing was held on October 15, 1999 at which time the Court heard oral arguments in support of and in opposition to Plaintiffs’ motion. For the following reasons, the Court denies Plaintiffs

Cardona, P. J. Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schenectady County (Eidens, J.), rendered March 8, 1996, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crimes of attempted murder in the second degree, assault in the first degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and criminal use of a firearm in the first degree. On May 12, 1995, at approximately 8:30 p.m. in the City of Schenectady,

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE September 16, 2010 Session PAMELA ANN BARNETT v. ELITE SPORTS MEDICINE, ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 09C4157 Barbara N. Haynes, Judge No. M2010-00619-COA-R3-CV - Filed December 17, 2010 In this case, we are asked to decide whether an amendment to Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-26-1

KLEINFELD, Circuit Judge, dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc, joined by BEA, Circuit Judge: I reach the same conclusion as Judge O’Scannlain, that we ought to rehear this case en banc and affirm. The district court was correct in dismissing Major Witt’s challenge for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. I write separately because that conclusion is compelling eve