Cases

OPINION Charles A. Parker appeals the summary judgments in favor of appellees, Garry *Page 361 Robert Yen and Revco Discount Drug Centers, Inc. In three points of error, Parker contends that the trial court erred in granting the summary judgments because there were genuine issues of material fact about (1) proximate cause and (2) whether the statute of limitations barred Parker's claims, and because (3) the summary judgments were

OPINION J. FREDERICK MOTZ, District Judge. Plaintiffs It’s My Party, Inc. (“IMP”) and It’s My Amphitheater, Inc. (“IMA”) (collectively “plaintiffs”) bring this lawsuit against Live Nation, Inc. (“Live Nation”) under sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1, 2; and the Maryland Antitrust Act, Md.Code Ann. §§ 11-201, 204 et seq. Plaintiffs allege that Live Nation has unreasona

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 15-1458v Filed: February 26, 2019 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * B.E., a minor, by and through his * PUBLISHED parent and natural guardian, * TARA EVANS, *

17-944-cv Sonterra Capital Master Fund Ltd. v. UBS AG 1 2 United States Court of Appeals 3 for the Second Circuit 4 5 August Term, 2019 6 7 (Argued: February 5, 2020 Decided: April 1, 2020) 8 9 Docket No. 17-944-cv 10 _____________________________________ 11 12 SONTERRA CAPITAL MASTER FUND LTD., CALIFORNIA STATE 13 TE

784 F.Supp.2d 313 (2011) ARISTA RECORDS LLC; Atlantic Recording Corporation; Arista Music, fka BMG Music; Capitol Records, Inc.; Elektra Entertainment Group Inc.; Interscope Records; Laface Records LLC; Motown Record Company, L.P.; Priority Records LLC; Sony Music Entertainment, fka Sony BMG Music Entertainment; UMG Recordings, Inc.; Virgin Records America, Inc.; and Warner Bros. Records Inc., Plaintiffs, v. LIME GROUP LLC; Lime Wire LLC; Mark Go

OPINION PRESKA, District Judge. [[Image here]] *181d. Prejudice.................................... 229 e. Effectiveness of Lesser Sanctions............... 230 3. 28 U.S.C. § 1927 ................................. 230 4. The Met Directors’ Deposition...................... 230

ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV

784 F.Supp.2d 398 (2011) ARISTA RECORDS LLC; Atlantic Recording Corporation; BMG Music; Capitol Records, Inc.; Elektra Entertainment Group Inc.; Interscope Records; Laface Records LLC; Motown Record Company, L.P.; Priority Records LLC; Sony BMG Music Entertainment; UMG Recordings, Inc.; Virgin Records America, Inc.; and Warner Bros. Records Inc., Plaintiffs, v. LIME GROUP LLC; Lime Wire LLC; Mark Gorton; Greg Bildson; and M.J.G. Lime Wire Family

780 F.Supp.2d 1357 (2011) JTEKT CORPORATION and Koyo Corporation of U.S.A., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and The Timken Company, Defendant-Intervenor. Slip Op. 11-92. Court No. 06-00250. United States Court of International Trade. July 29, 2011. *1359 Sidley Austin, LLP (Neil R. Ellis and Jill Caiazzo), Washington

ACCEPTED 15-25-00028-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 5/27/2025 4:56 PM NO. 15-25-00028-CV-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

JACOBS, Circuit Judge. In a period of less than five months-in 1994-95, plaintiff Henryk de Kwiatkowski (“Kwiatkowski”) made and lost hundreds *1296 of millions of dollars betting on the U.S. dollar by trading in currency futures. Kwi-atkowski traded on a governmental scale: At one point, his pos

Case: 21-1131 Document: 120 Page: 1 Filed: 06/02/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ VIRGINIA MILTON AND ARNOLD MILTON, ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND ALL OTHER SIMILARLY SITUATED PERSONS, ET AL., Plaintiffs-Appellants TRAVELERS EXCESS AND SURPLUS LINES COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STAT

Case: 21-1131 Document: 120 Page: 1 Filed: 06/02/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ VIRGINIA MILTON AND ARNOLD MILTON, ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND ALL OTHER SIMILARLY SITUATED PERSONS, ET AL., Plaintiffs-Appellants TRAVELERS EXCESS AND SURPLUS LINES COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STAT

ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV

419 F.Supp.2d 437 (2005) Jonathan SMITH, Petitioner-Cross-Respondent, v. POSITIVE PRODUCTIONS, Respondent-Cross-Respondent-Cross-Petitioner. No. 05 Civ. 3748(MBM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. September 28, 2005. *438 *439 *440

NO. 01-15-00267-CV FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS IN THE COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS FOR THE 1ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS 3/25/2015 12:01:47 PM AT HOUSTON CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued September 19, 2022 Decided April 27, 2023 No. 21-7078 STATE OF NEW YORK, ET AL., APPELLANTS v. META PLATFORMS, INC., APPELLEE Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 1:2

793 F.Supp.2d 1317 (2011) GEORGIA LATINO ALLIANCE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Nathan DEAL Governor of the State of Georgia, in his official capacity, et al., Defendants. Civil Action File No. 1:11-CV-1804-TWT. United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. June 27, 2011. *1321 Andre I. Segura, Elora Mu

CHIN, Circuit Judge: These appeals and cross-appeal, heard in tandem, challenge an opinion and order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Stanton, J.) and a judgment of the United States Tax Court (Kroupa, J.) applying the “eco*107nomic substance doctrine” to transactions involving foreign tax credits. In both ca

In an alleged price-fixing conspiracy, each overt act that is part of the violation and that injures the plaintiff starts the statutory period running again, regardless of the plaintiff's knowledge of the alleged illegality at much earlier times. Plaintiffs may only recover damages based on acts falling within the statutory period, and not based on previous acts. Merced Irrigation Dist. v. Barclays Bank PLC ,