⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Jonathan Thomas Tuttle”

District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014-10-15 · Published · cited 0×
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT July Term 2014 JONATHAN JOSEPH COVELLO, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D12-765 [October 15, 2014] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2012-11-27 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs September 5, 2012 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JONATHAN FREEMAN Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County No. 11-49 Roy B. Morgan, Jr., Judge No. W2011-02497-CCA-R3-CD - Filed November 27, 2012 A Madison County Jury convicted Defendant, Jonathan Freeman, of possession of more than o
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2013-09-26 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs April 23, 2013 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JONATHAN ANDREW DIETZ Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Putnam County No. 09-0983 Leon C. Burns, Jr., Judge No. M2012-02560-CCA-R3-CD - Filed September 26, 2013 A Putnam County Grand Jury returned an indictment against Defendant, Jonathan Andrew Dietz,
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001-06-27 · Published · cited 6× · 254 F.3d 368; 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 14268; 2001 WL 705495
BOUDIN, Chief Judge. In this case,.both sides appeal from the decision of the district court. The dispute concerns the extent of payments due from a corporate employer to its former chief executive officer. The difficult issue on appeal is whether the executive was entitled to receive benefits under a “change-in-control” contract. The underlying facts are largely undisputed. We
District Court, District of Columbia · 1999-07-07 · Published · cited 37× · 62 F. Supp. 2d 25; 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10532
62 F.Supp.2d 25 (1999) FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. MYLAN LABORATORIES, INC., Cambrex Corp., Profarmaco S.R.L., and Gyma Laboratories of America, Inc., Defendants. The State of Connecticut, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Mylan Laboratories, Inc., Cambrex Corp., Profarmaco S.R.L., Gyma Laboratories of America, Inc., and SST Corp., Defendants. Nos. 98-3114 (TFH), 98-3115(TFH). United State
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007-08-22 · Published · cited 22× · 499 F.3d 281; 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 19929; 2007 WL 2377601
499 F.3d 281 (2007) Alexus BENNETT, Aliyaha Bennett, Priscilla Bennett, Minors, by and through their Guardian Ad Litem Jonathan IRVINE, Appellants in No. 06-2978 v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA. The Estate of Porchia Bennett, Decedent, by and through the Administrator of the Estate, Thomas Bruno, Esq., Appellant in No. 06-2879 v. City of Philadelphia; Joe Maiden. Nos. 06-2879, 06-2978. United State
District Court, District of Columbia · 2012-10-24 · Published · cited 2× · 900 F. Supp. 2d 8
MEMORANDUM OPINION THOMAS F. HOGAN, District Judge. These proceedings arise from the D.C. Circuit’s remand of this action on jurisdictional grounds. On appeal, Defendants challenged, for the first time, the only basis for subject matter jurisdiction over the action — diversity jurisdiction. Defendants were able to demonstrate that at least one plaintiff was not diverse to ah of the defendants. Bec
District Court, District of Columbia · 1999-12-14 · Published · cited 31× · 99 F. Supp. 2d 1; 1999 WL 1705505
99 F.Supp.2d 1 (1999) FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. MYLAN LABORATORIES, INC., Cambrex Corp., Profarmaco S.R.L., and Gyma Laboratories of America, Inc. Nos. 98-3114 (TFH), 98-3115(TFH). United States District Court, District of Columbia. December 14, 1999. *2 Richard A. Feinstein, Bureau of Competition, Federal Trade Commission, Was
District Court, District of Columbia · 2004-01-16 · Published · cited 1× · 300 F. Supp. 2d 43; 57 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1141; 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 558; 2004 WL 77921
300 F.Supp.2d 43 (2004) In re LORAZEPAM & CLORAZEPATE ANTITRUST LITIGATION This document relates to: Health Care Service Corporation, Plaintiff, v. Mylan Laboratories, Inc., et al., Defendants, and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Mylan Laboratories, Inc., et al., Defendants. No. MDL NO. 1290, Nos. MISC.NO.99-276(TFH/JMF), 01-2646(TFH/JMF). United States D
Reardon v. Larkinpublic domain
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010-08-26 · Published · cited 6× · 2010 ME 86; 3 A.3d 376; 2010 Me. LEXIS 90; 2010 WL 3340598
3 A.3d 376 (2010) 2010 ME 86 Nathan REARDON v. Jonathan LARKIN et al. Docket: Pen-09-605 Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Submitted On Briefs: July 21, 2010. Decided: August 26, 2010. *377 Timothy E. Zerillo, Esq., Zerillo Law, LLC, Portland, ME, for Nathan Reardon. Thomas E. Getche
Supreme Court of Florida · 2022-02-10 · Published · cited 0×
Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC22-139 ____________ ADVISORY OPINION TO THE GOVERNOR RE: WHETHER ARTICLE III, SECTION 20(A) OF THE FLORIDA CONSTITUTION REQUIRES THE RETENTION OF A DISTRICT IN NORTHERN FLORIDA, etc. February 10, 2022 PER CURIAM. On February 1, 2022, the Governor of Florida requested an advisory opinion from this
District Court, W.D. Washington · 2003-08-22 · Published · cited 2× · 281 F. Supp. 2d 1234; 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20652; 2003 WL 22092346
281 F.Supp.2d 1234 (2003) Thomas R. DREILING, on behalf of INFOSPACE, INC., Plaintiff, v. Naveen JAIN and Anuradha Jain, husband and wife, and their marital community, the Jain Family Irrevocable Trust, the Naveen Jain Grat No. 1 Trust, and the Anuradha Jain Grat No. 1 Trust, Defendants, and Infospace, Inc., Nominal Defendant. No. C01-1528P. United States District Court, W.D. Washington.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2020-07-27 · Published · cited 0×
07/27/2020 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs January 8, 2020 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. MARVIN GLENN BORDEN Appeal from the Circuit Court for Weakley County No. 2018-CR-46 Jeff Parham, Judge ___________________________________
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2017-05-17 · Published · cited 0×
05/17/2017 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs March 21, 2017 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. LUCY CAITLIN ALFORD AND JEREMIE ALFORD Appeal from the Circuit Court for Franklin County Nos. 2016-CR-105-B, 2016-CR-105-C Thomas W. Graham, Judge
District Court, S.D. New York · 2009-09-30 · Published · cited 23× · 663 F. Supp. 2d 276; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93156; 2009 WL 3241548
663 F.Supp.2d 276 (2009) SECURITIES and EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. John Michael KELLY, Steven E. Rindner, Jopseph A. Ripp, and Mark Wovsaniker, Defendants. No. 08 Civ. 4612(CM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. September 30, 2009. *278 David Frohlich, Jeffrey.Brian Finnell, John J. Bowers, Melissa A. Robertson
District Court, S.D. New York · 2011-01-07 · Published · cited 17× · 765 F. Supp. 2d 301; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3290; 2011 WL 135845
765 F.Supp.2d 301 (2011) SECURITIES and EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. John Michael KELLY, Steven E. Rindner, and Mark Wovsaniker, Defendants. No. 08 Civ. 4612 (CM)(GWG). United States District Court, S.D. New York. January 7, 2011. *304 David Frohlich, Jeffrey Brian Finnell, John J. Bowers, Melissa A. Robertson, Richard S. H
District Court, W.D. Washington · 2003-07-09 · Published · cited 1× · 281 F. Supp. 2d 1215; 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22129; 2003 WL 22128787
281 F.Supp.2d 1215 (2003) Thomas R. DREILING, on behalf of INFOSPACE, INC., Plaintiff, v. Stiles A. KELLETT, Jr., an individual; and Kellett Partners LP, a limited partnership, and Naveen Jain and Anuradha Jain, husband and wife, and their marital community, the Jain Family Irrevocable Trust, the Naveen Jain Grat No. 1 Trust, and the Anuradha Jain Grat No. 1 Trust, Defendants, and Infospace, Inc., Nominal Defendant. No.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2017-01-24 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs September 7, 2016 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. ANDREW CURTIS BEARD Appeal from the Circuit Court for Gibson County No. 9414 Clayburn Peeples, Judge ___________________________________ No. W2016-00223-CCA-R3-CD - Filed January 24, 2017 _____________________________
District Court, District of Columbia · 2003-10-17 · Published · cited 0× · 295 F. Supp. 2d 30; 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23803
MEMORANDUM OPINION THOMAS F. HOGAN, Chief Judge. Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaints Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) [Civ. No. 01-2646 docket # 26] (“Def. Mot.”). Upon careful review of Defendants’ motion, Plaintiffs’ oppositions,1 Defendants’ reply thereto, the various supplemental filings of b
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2015-09-09 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs April 14, 2015 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. MICHAEL BROOKS Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 1202650 Chris Craft, Judge No. W2014-01391-CCA-R3-CD - Filed September 9, 2015 _____________________________ A Shelby County Grand Jury returned an indictment aga