Cases

MURPHY, Circuit Judge. Security National Bank .of Sioux City, Iowa, acting as conservator for minor J.M.K., brought this products liability action against Abbott Laboratories, alleging *938 that Abbott’s baby formula caused permanent brain damage to J.M.K. After the trial jury found in favor of Abbo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MARK C. SAVIGNAC, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 19-2443 (RDM) JONES DAY, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Since discovery began in this case in May 2021, the parties’ exchange of information has been heavily contested, neces

RCB BANK v. STITT2022 OK CIV APP 3Case Number: 117835; Consol w/116548 116551Decided: 01/05/2021Mandate Issued: 03/03/2022DIVISION IITHE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA, DIVISION II Cite as: 2022 OK CIV APP 3, __ P.3d __ RCB BANK, an Oklahoma Banking Association, Plaintiff/Appellee

OPINION AND ORDER THERESA L. SPRINGMANN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This case is an appeal from two orders issued by the United States Bankruptcy Court. On July 17, 2014, Judge J. Philip Klingeberger denied attorney Stuart K. Jones’s application for post facto appointment as special counsel for debtor Rose Romano. That same day, Judge Klingeber-ger also denied Jones’s motion that sought an award of adminis

OSCN Found Document:RCB BANK v. STITT, et al. RCB BANK v. STITT, et al.2026 OK 49Case Number: 122112Decided: 06/16/2026IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2026 OK 49, __ P.3d __ NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO REVISION OR WITHDRAWAL.

MEMORANDUM OPINION IN SUPPORT OF JUDGMENT ORDER DECLARING DEBT DISCHARGE-ABLE ROBERT A. GORDON, U.S. BANKRUPTCY JUDGE I. Preliminary Statement This Adversary Proceeding presents the question of whether in the midst of a budding romantic relationship, loans from one friend to another were made on the basis of the Defendant’s intentional misrepresentations that caused eithe

692 S.E.2d 774 (2010) JONES v. O'DAY. No. A09A1679. Court of Appeals of Georgia. March 26, 2010. *775 Nall & Miller, John D. Hocutt, George R. Neuhauser, Atlanta, for Appellant. Owen, Gleaton, Egan, Jones & Sweeney, Frederick N. Gleaton, Richard J. Baker, Weinberg, Wheeler, Hudgins, Gunn & Dial, Rachel A. Fuers

[Cite as U.S. Bank v. Hill, 2018-Ohio-4532.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OTTAWA COUNTY U.S. Bank N.A., as Trustee, on behalf Court of Appeals No. OT-17-029 of the holders of the J.P. Morgan Mortgage Acquisition Trust 2006-CH2, Asset Backed Trial Court No. 2016-CV-E-117 Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-CH2 Appellees v. Marily

498 F.Supp.2d 822 (2007) Trinette M. JONES, and Admiral Pointe, LP, Plaintiffs, v. BOTO COMPANY LIMITED, and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Defendants. Action No. 4:07cv45. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Newport News Division. July 17, 2007. *823 James Long Chapman, IV, Shawn Ashley Voyles, Crenshaw Ware & Martin PLC, N

MOORE, Chief Justice (concurring specially). I concur with the decision of the Court to deny the petition for a writ of mandamus. I write specially to explain my reasons for denying the petition: (1) the petitioners’ delay in moving to strike the demand for a jury trial and (2) the unconstitutionality of predispute contractual jury waivers as violating the right to a jury trial.

250 Kan. 688 (1992) 829 P.2d 578 ADMIRE BANK & TRUST, Appellant, v. CITY OF EMPORIA, KANSAS, Appellee. No. 66,655 Supreme Court of Kansas. Opinion filed April 10, 1992. Mark E. Jones, of Polsinelli, White, Vardeman & Shalton, of Overland Park, argued the cause and was on the briefs for appellant. Dale W. Bell, of

Justice PARRISH, opinion of the Court: INTRODUCTION + T1 We are asked to determine whether filing an action to foreclose a judgment lien tolls the expiration of the underlying judgment. Appellant Bruce Gildea filed an action against Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., seeking to foreclose his judgment lien against property owned by Wells Fargo.

974 F.Supp. 712 (1997) Paula Corbin JONES, Plaintiff, v. William Jefferson CLINTON and Danny Ferguson, Defendants. No. LR-C-94-290. United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Western Division. August 22, 1997. *713 *714 *715 Daniel M. Traylor, Little Rock

Justice Souter delivered the opinion of the Court. This case turns on whether the federal carjacking statute, 18 U. S. C. §2119, as it was when petitioner was charged, defined three distinct offenses or a single erime with a choice of three maximum penalties, two of them dependent on sentencing factors exempt from the requirements of charge and jury verdict. We think the better reading is of three distinct offe

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION BILL PARKER, Bankruptcy Judge. ON THIS DATE the Court considered the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Plaintiff, Christopher Moser, the duly-appointed Trustee of the Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Estate of Bobby G. Loggins (the “Trustee”), and the competing Motion for Summary Judgment filed by the Defendant, Bank of Tyler, a division of Huntington State Bank (the “Bank”), the respon

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER G. MICHAEL HARVEY, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE This matter has been referred to the undersigned for the management of discovery. On July 28, 2017, Plaintiff filed a letter brief seeking to compel Claimant Pavel Lazarenko (“Claimant”) to provide a supplementary response to' one of Plainti

Opinion And Order BLOCK, Judge. I. Introduction This case is one of the last of the Winstar-related progeny facing this court. It involves a series of contracts in which the government promised to allow the plaintiff, Anchor Savings Bank, FSB (“Anchor”) to account for “supervisory goodwill” as a capital asset that would count toward Anchor’s regulatory capital requirement and be amor

JUSTICE PINCHAM, dissenting: I dissent. The police tactics in the case at bar and their approval by the trial court and this court promote and advance the despicable oppressions known to exist in totalitarian police states in which cherished civil liberties are enjoyed by only the privileged and powerful few.

Opinion SILLS, P. J. Felix Frankfurter once made fun of the tendency of courts to look at legislative history rather than the actual words of the statute. “[Tjhis *1571is a case for applying the canon of construction of the wag who said, when the legislative history is doubtful, go to the statute,” he wrote. (Greenwood v. United States

RIPPLE, Circuit Judge. Ronald South, an investment advisor in Belleville, Illinois, purchased an errors and omissions policy from Transamerica Insurance Company (Transamerica). The policy contained a clause excluding coverage for claims arising out of the insolvency of any organization in which Mr. South placed the funds of a client. In 1988, Mr. South encouraged several clients to purchase “risk-free” annuities from First C