Cases

Aff. Cir. Ct. (Jackson)

780 N.W.2d 248 (2010) GUTHRIE v. JONES. No. 09-0443. Court of Appeals of Iowa. February 10, 2010. Decision Without Published Opinion Affirmed.

ROBERTS, J., for the Court: ¶ 1. This appeal requires an examination of the acceptable manners in which a plaintiff under the Mississippi Tort Claims Act (MTCA) may serve a notice of claim. Gwen and James Guthrie argue that the Jones County Circuit Court erred when it dismissed their complaint against the Jones County School District and the Jones County Board of Education (collectively “District”). The ci

43 P.3d 601 (2002) 202 Ariz. 273 Michael Floyd GUTHRIE, Petitioner, v. The Honorable Michael D. JONES, Judge of the Superior Court of the State of Arizona, in and for the County of Maricopa, Respondent Judge, State of Arizona, Real Party in Interest. No. 1 CA-SA 01-0312. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department B. April 4, 2002. <

PER CURIAM. Appeal, 72 F.Supp. 784, docketed and dismissed per stipulation.

332 S.W.3d 578 (2009) The CITY OF HOUSTON, Texas, Harris County Municipal Utility District 132, Harris County Municipal District 157, and Harris County Municipal Utility District 152, Appellants, v. Joel GUTHRIE d/b/a Sarges Fireworks, Fireworks Center 50, LLC, Paul Dewey Jones d/b/a Freedom 2000 Fireworks, Metro Church, and Gulf Coast Avenue C, LLC, Appellees. No. 01-08-00712-CV. Court of Appeals of T

2020 IL App (5th) 190306 NOTICE Decision filed 12/16/20. The text of this decision may be NO. 5-19-0306 changed or corrected prior to the filing of a Petition for IN THE Rehearing or the disposition of the same. APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT ______________________________________________________________________________ TRISTA OETT

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and

On November 14, 1991, the Clermont County Grand Jury indicted defendant-appellant, Daniel Guthrie, on three charges of rape in violation of R.C. 2907.02(A)(1)(b), three counts of gross sexual imposition in violation of R.C. 2907.05(A)(4), and three counts of felonious sexual penetration in violation of R.C.2907.12(A)(1)(b). One of the rape counts was dismissed prior to trial. The in

Per Curiam. Appellee Twin City Bank moves to dismiss the appeal filed by Gertie Guthrie on the basis that her notice of appeal was untimely. Appellant’s action against appellee was dismissed by summary judgment filed in the trial court on April 13, 1994. On April 25, 1994, appellant filed a motion for reconsideration requesting the trial court to set aside the s

PER CURIAM: This is an appeal by James B. Jones, Eugene Jones, Mary Lou Maynard, Bobby Lee Jones and Paul H. Jones from a summary judgment entered by the Circuit Court of McDowell County in an action involving the estate of their mother, Ochel Jones. On appeal, the appellants claim that there were material questions of fact to be tried at the time the circuit court entered summary judgment, and that under the circumstances,

2008 WY 150 ROGER SWINNEY, CAROL SWINNEY, RA SWINNEY, LLP, A COLORADO ENTITIY, and CE SWINNEY, LLC, A WYOMING ENTITY, Appellants (Plaintiffs), v. JAMES E. JONES, III, LYNNE A. LOVELACE, LAUREL MILLER LUNSTRUM, CATHLEEN A. JONES, HILLTOP NATIONAL BANK as TRUSTEE, R.M. WHALEN MD, PC PSP TRUST, AURLA J. WELO, ANTHONY G. INGRAM and ROBERT P. INGRAM, Appellees (Defendants). No. S-07-0176 Supreme Court of Wy

Plaintiff, Lorinda Otto, appeals from a summary judgment in favor of defendants, Thomas H. Guthrie, Sr., Patricia E. Guthrie, and Thomas H. Guthrie, Jr., in plaintiff's action to recover damages based upon the alleged negligence of Thomas H. Guthrie, Jr. We reverse and remand. On June 8, 1983, plaintiff and Thomas H. Guthrie, Jr., were involved in an automobile collision in Huntsville. The automobile being driven by Guthrie, Jr., at the time was owned by one of his parents, eit

Richardson, J., filed a concurring opinion in which Johnson, J., and Newell, J., joined. I join the majority opinion. I, too, am not convinced that the judgment nunc pro *8tunc in this ease was properly issued, and I agree that this matter should be remanded to the trial court for a hearing on this issue. A court may

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. PD-0125-14 VERA ELIZABETH GUTHRIE-NAIL, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS COLLIN COUNTY R ICHARDSON, J.,

144 Cal.App.3d 832 (1983) 193 Cal. Rptr. 54 THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CLAY GUTHRIE, Defendant and Appellant. Docket No. 11943. Court of Appeals of California, Third District. July 11, 1983. *835 COUNSEL James R. Lee, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellan

Breese, J. We do not deem it necessary now to consider more than one point in this case, and that is, was the judgment in the U. S. Circuit Court for this district, a lien upon the premises in controversy ? There is no statute of the United States making judgments rendered in their Circuit or District Courts liens upon real estate. By the law of this State, judgments become

12 N.Y.3d 816 (2009) PEOPLE v. GUTHRIE. Court of Appeals of New York. April 20, 2009. Application in criminal case for leave to appeal denied. (Jones, J.).

EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff-appellant Reed L. Guthrie sued Tifco Industries alleging a violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-34, and pendent state law claims for wrongful discharge, breach of an implied contract, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The district court dismissed the pendent state law claims, and g

*541KONENKAMP, Justice. [¶ 1.] Petitioner was convicted in 2001 of the murder of his wife. He sought habeas corpus relief in circuit court asserting that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to move to suppress evidence obtained with a search warrant and subpoenas duces tecum. The habeas court denied relief. It concluded that the warrant was supported by probab