Cases

NOTICE: SLIP OPINION (not the court’s final written decision) The opinion that begins on the next page is a slip opinion. Slip opinions are the written opinions that are originally filed by the court. A slip opinion is not necessarily the court’s final written decision. Slip opinions can be changed by subsequent court orders. For example, a court may issue an order making substantive changes to a slip opinion or publishing for precedential pur

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON CERTIFICATION FROM THE UNITED ) STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ) EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON ) No. 92081-8 IN ) ) LAURA ZAMORA JORDAN, as her ) EnBanc separate estate, and on behalf of others ) similarly situated, )

Owens, J. ¶ 1 After defaulting on her home mortgage payment, plaintiff Laura Jordan returned home from work one evening to discover she could not enter her own house: the locks had been changed without warning. A notice informed her that in order to gain access to her home, she must call defendant Nationstar Mortgage LLC to obtain the lockbox code and retrieve the new key inside. Although she eventually reentered her home, she r

Justice PARRISH, opinion of the Court: INTRODUCTION T1 This case involves Salt Lake City's (City) petition to validate municipal bonds pursuant to the Bond Validation Act (Validation Act). In 2003, the City asked voters to approve Proposition No. 5, which proposed the issuance of bonds to finance construction of a "Regional Sports, Recreation and Education Complex." Voters approved the

Lafayette Vill. Pub, LLC v. Burnham, 2025 NCBC 8. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION WAKE COUNTY 24CV031560-910 LAFAYETTE VILLAGE PUB, LLC, JOHN S. BRONSON, and PAUL G. BRONSON, Plaintiffs, ORDER AND OPINION ON DEFENDANT KENNETH C. v.

USCA11 Case: 20-14846 Date Filed: 03/29/2022 Page: 1 of 68 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20-14846 ____________________ DEBORAH LAUFER, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus ARPAN LLC, d.b.a. America’s Best V

[Regarding Application of the Court's Prior Rulings on Manifestation, Incidental Damages (Lost Time), and Unjust Enrichment to All Remaining Jurisdictions in Dispute (MDL Order No. 131 Issues) ] JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION... 274 LEGAL STANDARDS... 275 DISCUSSION... 275 A. Manifestation... 276

Filed 12/4/20; Certified for Publication 12/18/20 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE 11 LAGUNITA, LLC et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, G058436 v. (Super. Ct. No. 30-2018-01013545) CALIFORNIA COASTAL

Filed 1/7/21 (mod.); pub. order 12/18/20 follows unmodified opinion (attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE 11 LAGUNITA, LLC, et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, G058436 v. (Super

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 20-1230C Filed: February 7, 2021 Redacted Version Issued for Publication: March 18, 20211 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * MORTGAGE CONTRACTING * SERVICES, LLC, * *

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA PUBLISHED Present: Chief Judge Decker, Judges Malveaux and Causey Argued at Richmond, Virginia CITY-TO-CITY AUTO SALES, LLC, ET AL. OPINION BY v. Record No. 0728-22-2 CHIEF JUDGE MARLA GRAFF DECKER

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO Opinion Number:______________ Filing Date: August 22, 2013 Docket No. 33,687 ELANE PHOTOGRAPHY, LLC, Plaintiff-Petitioner, v. VANESSA WILLOCK, Defendant-Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ON CERTIORARI Alan M. Malott, District Judge Modrall, Sperling, Roehl, Harris & Sisk, P.A. Emil John Kiehne Albuquerque, NM Becht Law Office Paul F. Becht Albuquerque, NM Alliance Defending Freedom Jordan W. Lorence Washington, D.C.

I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document New Mexico Compilation Commission, Santa Fe, NM '00'04- 09:54:09 2013.09.20 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO Opinion Number: 2013-NMSC-040 Filing Date: August 22, 2013 Doc

JUDGE JOHN W. deGRAVELLES Before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants, United Healthcare Services, Inc. and United Healthcare of Louisiana, Inc. (collectively "United Defendants" *718or "United").1 Plaintiff, Omega Hospital, LLC ("Omega") has filed an Opposition to

DOLLY M. GEE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Currently before the Court is Defendants Airbnb, Inc.'s and Airbnb Payments, Inc.'s (collectively, "Airbnb") motion to dismiss ("MTD") [Doc. # 16] or, in the alternative, motion to strike ("MTS") [Doc. # 17].1 Plaintiffs La Park La Brea A LLC, La Park La Brea B LLC, La P

STEWART, J. At issue in this case is a dispute between the public and property owners over the use of a road, parking area and the inland dry sand of a popular beach. There is no disagreement about defendants' ownership of these areas or the property of which they are a part. Rather, the public rights claimed by plaintiff are predicated on two theories. The first is that a provision of the California Constitution confers on the pu

Opinion by JUDGE TERRY T1 This case involves issues of first impression that require us to interpret the seope and applicability of Colorado's economic loss rule. We affirm the trial court's entry of summary judgment against plaintiff, Engeman Enterprises, LLC, and in favor of defendant, Tolin Mechanical Systems Company. I. Background {2 For purposes of reviewing the s

ACCEPTED 04-15-00469-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 9/3

ORDER NANCY J. KOPPE, United States Magistrate Judge Pending before the Court is the motion to compel and the motion for sanctions filed by Plaintiff Nationstar Mortgage, LLC (“Na-tionstar”). Docket No. 60. Defendant SFR Investment Pool 1, LLC (“SFR”) filed a response in opposition, and Nationstar filed a reply. Docket Nos. 64, 66. The motions are properly resolved without a hearing. See Local Rule