Cases

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL ESPECIAL MIGDALIA LÓPEZ CERTIORARI GÓMEZ procedente del Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Parte Recurrida Sala Superior de

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL XI MIGDALIA LÓPEZ GÓMEZ CERTIORARI Procedente del Peticionaria Tribunal de Primera Instancia, v. Sala Superior de KLCE202400408 San Juan

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL XI Certiorari procedente MIGDALIA LÓPEZ GÓMEZ del Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Sala PETICIONARIA Superior de San Juan V. Civil

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 367 KA 05-02660 PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., CARNI, DEJOSEPH, CURRAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOSE GOMEZ, ALSO KNOWN AS JIM RAY, ALSO KNOWN AS BOLO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. DAVISON LAW OFFICE PLLC, CANANDAIGUA (MARY P. DAVISON OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. BROOKS T. BAKER,

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed January 20, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D19-2257 Lower Tribunal No. 13-27684 ________________ Giuliana Gomez De Cordova n/k/a Giuliana Llanso,

AC-96-58, CC-96-228, CC-96-232 1 En el Tribunal Supremo de Puerto Rico NAYDA CINTRON ADORNO Y OTROS Demandantes-recurridos Apelación Y V. Certiorari JOSE A. GOMEZ Y OTROS 98TSPR18 Demandados-peticionarios Número del Caso: AC-96-58 , CC-96-228, CC-96-232 CONS. Abogados de las Partes Peticionarias: En el

Motion for writ of error coram nobis granted. Memorandum: Defendant contends that he was denied effective assistance of appellate counsel because counsel failed to raise an issue on *1346direct appeal, specifically, whether the court placed on the record a reasonable basis for restraining defendant before the jury. Upon our review of the motion papers, we conclude that the issue may have merit.

SHEPHERD, Circuit Judge. Jose Luis Mendez-Gomez, a citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of (1) the Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) reinstatement of a prior order for his removal, and (2) a Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) decision that affirmed an immigration judge's (IJ) denial of his applications for withholding of removal and deferral of removal under the Convention A

OPINION BENAVIDES, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff Jose Gomez appeals adverse summary judgment on personal and putative class claims brought pursuant to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”), 47 U.S.C. § 227(b)(l)(A)(iii) (2012). Gomez alleges that the CampbellEwald Company instructed or allowed a third-party vendor to send unsolicited text messages on

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Pitts, J.), entered July 23, 2008, as, after a jury trial, and upon the granting of the defendant’s motion pursuant to CPLR 4401 for judgment as a matter of law at the close of the plaintiff’s case, is in favor of the defendant and against him, dismissing the complaint. Ordered that the judgment i

PER CURIAM. The court having received the October 27, 2016, order of the Supreme Court of Florida quashing this court’s opinion of November 19, 2015, and remanding the matter for reconsideration upon application of Westphal v. City of St. Petersburg, 194 So.3d 311 (Fla. 2016), and finding that reversal is warranted in light of that opinion, the order of the Judge of Compensati

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for medical malpractice, the defendant Wyckoff Heights Medical Center appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jacobson, J.), dated February 26, 2015, which granted the plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend the complaint to the extent of permitting the plaintiff to add a cause of action against it alleging negligent hiring, retention, and supervision of

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. NORTHCUTT, MORRIS, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.

Appeal from a judgment of the Steuben County Court (Joseph W. Latham, J.), rendered November 16, 2005. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of burglary in the second degree, attempted assault in the second degree, assault in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, criminal mischief in the fourth degree, petit larceny and tampering with physical evidence. It is hereby ordered that the j

COLLOTON, Circuit Judge. Jose Gomez and five other named plaintiffs brought this suit under the Nebraska Wage Payment and Collection Act, Neb. Rev.Stat. §§ 48-1228 to 48-1234, and the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219. They sought overtime and minimum wage payments for certain pre- and post-shift activities while they were employed by Tyson Foods, Inc. They r

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Underwood, J.), entered June 29, 2001, which, upon the granting of the defendants’ motion to preclude the plaintiffs’ only medical expert from testifying, dismissed the complaint. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs. The Supreme Court providently exercised its disc

ON PETITION FOR CERTIFICATION To the Appellate Division, Superior Court: A petition for certification of the judgment in A-003754-14 having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same; It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOSEPH F. BATAILLON, District Judge. This matter is before the court on the plaintiffs’ Objection to Magistrate Judge’s Order, and, in the Alternative, Motion to Amend Class Definition, Filing No. 338, and *399on the defendant’s Motion to Decertify, Filing No. 417.1 1. Plaintiffs’

Appeal from a judgment of the Steuben County Court (Joseph W. Latham, J.), rendered November 16, 2005. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of burglary in the second degree, attempted assault in the second degree, as*1487sault in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, criminal mischief in the fourth degree, petit larceny and tampering with physi

Appeal from a judgment of the Steuben County Court (Joseph W. Latham, J.), rendered November 16, 2005. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of burglary in the second degree, attempted assault in the second degree, as*1487sault in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, criminal mischief in the fourth degree, petit larceny and tampering with physi