Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Jose A Sanchez”
Jose A. Sanchez v. U.S. Bank, N.A.public domain
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed June 28, 2013. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00072-CV JOSE A. SANCHEZ AND ALL OTHER OCCUPANTS OF 6717 LA COSTA DRIVE, ROWLETT, TEXAS 75088, Appellants V. U.S.
Jose A. Sanchez v. U.S. Bank, N.A.public domain
Order entered February 12, 2013 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00072-CV JOSE A. SANCHEZ, Appellant V. U.S. BANK, N.A., Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5
Sanchez Nazario, Jose a v. One Corps, Inc.public domain
Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL I Certiorari JOSÉ A. SÁNCHEZ procedente del Tribunal de Primera Peticionario Instancia, Sala de KLCE202300094 Arecibo v.
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL VII CAPITAL MANAGEMENT Certiorari GROUP, LLC (COMO AGENTE procedente del DE JEFFERSON CAPITAL Tribunal de SYSTEMS, LLC) Primera Instancia, Sala Recurrido KLCE202500464 Superior de San
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL VII JOSÉ A. SÁNCHEZ ROA Revisión administrativa RECURRENTE procedente del Departamento de v.
United States v. Jose Sanchez-Sanchezpublic domain
PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge: Jose Alfredo Sanchez-Sanehez appeals his sentence and challenges the district court’s application of an enhancement based on a prior Texas conviction for a crime of violence. We are asked to determine whether the district court was pre- *303 eluded from relyin
Jose A. Sanchez-Benitez, Claimant-Appellant v. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary of Veterans Affairspublic domain
CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge. Jose A. Sanehez-Benitez appeals from the decision by the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (“Veterans Court”) on December 29,1999, affirming the denial by the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (“Board”) of his claims for service connection for a neck disability and increased rating for a low back claim. Sanchez-Benitez v. West, 13 Vet.App. 282 (1999). We dismiss-in-part, vacate-in-part, and r
State v. Lixandra Hernandez and Jose Sanchez(075444)public domain
Justice ALBIN delivered the opinion of the Court. New Jersey provides a broad range of discovery to an accused in a criminal case under Rule 3:13-3. This open-file approach is intended to ensure fair and just trials. Here, the issue is not whether defendants have a right to discovery of the prosecutor’s file in their case, but whether they
GOODWIN, Circuit Judge: Jose Flores-Sanchez (“Sanchez”) appeals his conviction and sentence for illegal reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. 1 He assigns error to: (1) denial of his motion to dismiss the indictments; (2) commencement of trial one day after his first appearance on the superseding in
*689 Lawrence-Berrey, J. ¶1 Jose Luis Sanchez Jr. seeks relief from personal restraint imposed for his 2008 Yakima County convictions of two counts of aggravated first degree murder and other felony crimes. The convictions stem from his participation in a February 20, 2005 home invasion robbery and executio
Jose Sanchez and Cardenas Auto Sales, a Texas General Partnership v. Daniel Jackson & Associates, P.C.public domain
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 24, 2022. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-21-00514-CV JOSE SANCHEZ AND CARDENAS AUTO SALES, A TEXAS GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, Appellant V. DANIEL JACKSON & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Appellee On Appeal from the 127th District Court
THOMAS, Circuit Judge: We considered this appeal en banc to determine whether a violation of California Health and Safety Code § 11360(a) constitutes an aggravated felony for the purposes of sentencing pursuant to United *907 States Sentencing Guidelines (“U.S.S.G.”) § 2L1.2(b)(l
Motion to Abate Denied; Motion to Dismiss Granted; Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 27, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-21-00342-CV JOSE SANCHEZ AND CARDENAS AUTO SALES, A TEXAS GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, Appellants V. DANIEL JACKSON & ASSOCIATES, P.C., D/B/A THE JACKSON LAW FIRM, Appellee
in Matter of Jose Sanchez v. Kellypublic domain
Determination of respondent Police Commissioner, dated August 9, 2006, which, after a hearing, sustained charges against petitioner, a sergeant in the New York City Police Department, and recommended that petitioner forfeit 20 vacation days, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Kibbie F. Payne, J.], entered on or about Ju
People v. Sanchezpublic domain
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (D’Emic, J.), dated September 21, 2015, as, after a hearing, and, in effect, upon renewal, adhered to a prior determination of the same court in an order dated July 24, 2012, denying his motion to be resentenced pursuant to CPL 440.46 on his conviction of criminal possession of a controlled substance in t
People v. Sanchezpublic domain
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Suffolk County (Condon, J.), imposed June 23, 2016, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive. Ordered that the sentence is affirmed. The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentence imposed was ex
Grocers Supply, Inc. and Jose Narciso Sanchez v. Jose Luis Cabello, Angel Cabello, and Ramiro Cabellopublic domain
*711 OPINION Opinion By Justice MURPHY. Grocers Supply, Inc. and its driver, Jose Narciso Sanchez, appeal a jury award of damages to brothers Jose, Angel, and Ramiro Cabello resulting from the collision of Grocers’s tractor trailer with Angel’s and Jose’s pick
United States v. Sanchezpublic domain
PER CURIAM: Jose Sanchez appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to reduce his sentence, under § 3582(c)(2). Sanchez (a former TSA agent) was eligible for a potential reduction. But the district court retained the discretion to refuse to reduce the sentence. The district court did not abuse its discretion in declining to grant Sanchez relief: a decision based on the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors — the court conducted
Sanchez v. Suastipublic domain
LOGUE, J. Jose I. Sanchez, the father, appeals the trial court’s denial of his petition for the return of his minor children to Brazil under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction.1 While acknowledging that the mother, Ruth E. Suasti, unilaterally removed the children from Brazil, the trial court decided that the father lacked the necessary “rights of custody” un
Sanchez-Perez v. Sanchez-Gonzalezpublic domain
717 F.Supp.2d 187 (2010) Roxana SANCHEZ-PEREZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Jose SANCHEZ-GONZALEZ, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 06-1035 (FAB). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. June 15, 2010. Opinion Denying Reconsideration July 2, 2010. *188 Edgardo L. Rivera-Rivera, Jose L. Lugo-Mercado, Rivera & Fer