Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Jose M Quintero”
United States v. Jose M. Quintero-Barrazapublic domain
MERHIGE, Senior District Judge: Jose Martin Quintero-Barraza (“Appellant”) appeals his jury conviction for possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance (21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1)) and aiding and abetting the same (18 U.S.C. § 2). His appeal also encompasses a sentence imposed on each of the two counts of the indictment returned against him. This court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. I.
United States v. Jose M. Quintero-Barrazapublic domain
*839MERHIGE, Senior District Judge: Jose Martin Quintero-Barraza (“Appellant”) appeals his jury conviction for possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance (21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1)) and aiding and abetting the same (18 U.S.C. § 2). His appeal also encompasses a sentence imposed on each of the two counts of the indictment returned against him. This court has
Opinion issued June 15, 2023 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-22-00230-CV ——————————— RAMARAO DENDULURI, M.D. AND HOUSTON UROLOGY PARTNERS, Appellants V. MARIA NANCY BRAV
Quinteros v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.
Martinez-Quintero v. Gonzalespublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Jose Luis Martinez-Quintero and Maria De Los Angeles Martinez Garcia, husband and wife, and natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ summary affirmance of an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying their application for cancellation of removal. To the extent we have jurisdiction, it is conferred by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We dismiss in part and deny in
Juan Jose Quintero v. Statepublic domain
ACCEPTED 14-15-00252-CR FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 8/24/2015 8:12:07 PM
PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge: A jury convicted Jose Lopez Quintero on two separate counts for being a three-time convicted felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(e)(1). The trial judge sentenced Quintero to consecutive twenty year prison terms on each count pursuant to § 924(e)(1). For the reasons stated below, we affirm Quinte
United States v. Jose Quinteropublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Nos. 08-4033 and 09-1048 U NITED S TATES OF A MERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JOSE L. Q UINTERO, Defendant-Appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin. No. 3:08-cr-00088-bbc-1—Bar
FILED JANUARY 18, 2024 In the Office of the Clerk of Court WA State Court of Appeals, Division III IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION THREE In the Matter of the Personal Restraint of )
Quintero, Juanpublic domain
PD-0746-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 7/17/2015 1:31:42 PM Accepted 7/17/2015 4:31:56 PM A
United States v. Caro-Quinteropublic domain
745 F.Supp. 599 (1990) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Rafael CARO-QUINTERO, et al., Defendants. No. CR 87-422(F)-ER. United States District Court, C.D. California. August 10, 1990. As Corrected August 14, 1990. *600 U.S. Atty., Manuel A. Medrano, John L. Carlton, Asst. U.S. Attys., Los Angeles, Cal., for
United States v. Caro-Quinteropublic domain
769 F.Supp. 1564 (1991) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Rafael CARO-QUINTERO, et al., Defendants. CR 87-422(F)-ER. United States District Court, C.D. California. July 18, 1991. As Corrected July 26, 1991. *1565 *1566 *1567 Gary A. F
United States v. Quintero-Bernalpublic domain
Hon. Gonzalo P. Curiel, United States District Judge Before the Court is Defendant Yonel Quintero-Bernal's motion to suppress evidence found in his vehicle during a traffic stop, and later, his apartment. (ECF No. 25.) The instant motion was filed on October 19, 2017, and the government filed a response in opposition on November 2, 2017 (ECF No. 27). The Court held an evidentiary hearing on the suppression motion on November 9.
Juarez v. Quinteropublic domain
530 F.Supp. 267 (1981) Jose P. JUAREZ, Maura R. Juarez, Imelda Fernandez, Gilberto Castro, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. Jesus QUINTERO, John Fernandez, Guadalupe Barragan, Ramiro Rodriguez, Jose Rodriguez, and Manuel Salinas, Defendants. No. C-80-4021 WHO. United States District Court, N. D. California. May 12, 1981.
State of Tennessee v. Jose Luis Quinteropublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE January 25, 2005 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JOSE LUIS QUINTERO Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Wilson County Nos. 01-1290, 01-1290A & 01-1291, 01-1291A J. O. Bond, Judge No. M2003-02311-CCA-R3-CD - Filed April 22, 2005 After a bench trial, the Defendant, Jose Luis Quintero, was con
State v. Jose Batista-Salvapublic domain
HANTZ MARCONI, J. **820 The defendant, Jose Batista-Salva, appeals his conviction for witness tampering following a jury trial in Superior Court ( Colburn , J.). See RSA 641:5, I (2016). He raises three arguments on appeal, each of which is premised on
The State of Texas v. Sebastian Andres Quinteropublic domain
08-24-00155-CR through 08-24-00157-CR 08-24-00199-CR ACCEPTED 08-24-00155-CR 08-24-00159-CR through 08-24-00161-CR 08-24-00201-CR through 08-24-00202-CR EIGHTH COURT OF APPEALS 08-24-00163-CR through 08-24-00180-CR 08-24-00204-CR through 08-24-00209-CR EL PASO, TEXAS
Jose Salazar v. Merrick Garlandpublic domain
USCA4 Appeal: 21-1967 Doc: 38 Filed: 01/03/2023 Pg: 1 of 13 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-1967 JOSÉ RAFAEL SALAZAR, Petitioner, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent.
Jose Fierro v. Keith Smithpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JOSE ABEL FIERRO, No. 19-16786 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:13-cv-02173- JJT KEITH SMITH, Security Operations Administrator at Phoenix Division Director’s Office; MARLENE OPINION COFFEY; PRUETT, D.W.; L. FORESTER, D.W.; ROS
Jose Trejo Tepas v. Merrick Garlandpublic domain
USCA4 Appeal: 22-1049 Doc: 31 Filed: 07/10/2023 Pg: 1 of 19 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-1049 JOSE IVAN TREJO TEPAS, Petitioner, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent