Cases

97 Md. App. 180 (1993) 627 A.2d 555 ROBERT LOUIS OATES, III v. STATE OF MARYLAND. No. 1805, September Term, 1991. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. July 13, 1993. Brian J. Murphy, Assigned Public Defender (Stephen E. Harris, Public Defender, on the brief), Baltimore, for appellant. Kathryn Grill Graeff, Asst. Atty. Gen. (J. Joseph

BYE, Circuit Judge. After Joseph Jonquil Oates pleaded guilty to credit card fraud and identity theft, the district court 1 sentenced him to forty-one months of imprisonment. Oates appeals contending the district court erred in calculating his sentence under the United States Sentencing Guidelines (U.S.S.G.). Oates al

The appellant was convicted on an indictment charging him with receiving, concealing, etc., One Mercury Outboard Motor, of the value of $1,000.00, the personal property of Carl Bolch, Jr., knowing it was stolen and not having the intent to restore it to the owner, and sentenced to imprisonment in the penitentiary for a term of eight years. The appellant was represented by counsel of his choice at all proceedings in the trial court and is represented in this Court by the same co

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 04-4018 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for th

MODIFY and AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed November 4, 2016. S Court of Appeals In The Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-16-00369-CR TIRAY I. OATES, Appellant

ACCEPTED 01-14-953-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 1/23/2015 4:53:

Mr. JUSTICE ALLOY delivered the opinion of the court: Defendant Jay Oates appeals from convictions of reckless conduct and unlawful use of weapons following a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Tazewell County. Defendant was sentenced on the unlawful use of weapons conviction to a one-year term of probation, conditioned upon the payment of a *500 fine and the se

FabricaNT, Judith, J. INTRODUCTION This action arises from the construction of Millennium Place, a large-scale residential, hotel, and commercial condominium project in downtown Boston. The plaintiff, as president of the association of unit owners of one of the four components of the project, alleges that the project suffers from construction defects, and that the developer and its appointed majority of the bo

ARROWOOD, Judge. *199Angela E. Joseph ("defendant") appeals from an order modifying custody of minor child ("J.J.") and granting sole legal and primary physical custody to Dexter D. Peeler ("plaintiff"). For the reasons stated herein, we affirm. I. Background Plaintiff and defendant engaged in a relatio

179 P.3d 930 (2008) Margret A. MULLINS, Appellant, v. Alice OATES, Appellee. No. S-11623. Supreme Court of Alaska. February 29, 2008. Rehearing Denied April 2, 2008. *932 Margret A. Mullins, pro se, Delta Junction, Appellant. Kenneth P. Ringstad, Paskvan & Ringstad, P.C., Fairbanks, for Appellee. <

ON MOTIONS TO SEAL EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge. During my tour as motions judge, the appellants in this case (collectively Quaker Oats) sought leave to file their jurisdictional statement and other papers under seal. They implied a desire to hold the entire appellate proceedings off the public record. Such an extraordinary request requires an extraordinar

FLAUM, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff PepsiCo, Inc., sought a preliminary injunction against defendants William Redmond and the Quaker Oats Company to prevent Redmond, a former PepsiCo employee, from divulging PepsiCo trade secrets and confidential information in his new job with Quaker and from assuming any duties with Quaker relating to beverage pricing, marketing, and distributio

ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR CHANGE OF VENUE CONNOR, District Judge. This action is in this court on removal by the defendant from Rockingham County Superior Court. It arises out of an automobile accident that allegedly occurred on November 5, 1965, in York, Maine. The plaintiff was a passenger in the defendant’s ear at the time of the accident and claims that he suffered injuries due to the defendant’

IN eLiim omcB This opinion was filed for record IoouRr,nm or WHSHMOTOM OAT^JiuVjjJSi? at on/\i(>?) ^3-^ %\AAhAA^. CO ■ GM^JUSnCE / ^ SUSAN L. CARLSON SUPREME COURT CLERK IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

NOTICE: SLIP OPINION (not the court’s final written decision) The opinion that begins on the next page is a slip opinion. Slip opinions are the written opinions that are originally filed by the court. A slip opinion is not necessarily the court’s final written decision. Slip opinions can be changed by subsequent court orders. For example, a court may issue an order making substantive changes to a slip opinion or publishing for precedential pur

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE NETAPP, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2020-1000-LWW ) ALBERT E. CINELLI, AL.E.C ) HOLDING CORP., AEC CAPITAL ) CORPORATION, THE ALBERT E. ) CINELLI AND SHARON A. CINELLI ) 2014 REVOCABLE TRUST, JOHN ) CINELLI, JANET CINELLI,

WATERMAN, Circuit Judge: This is an appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York convicting appellant, following a six-day jury trial, of possession of heroin with intent to distribute, and of conspiracy to commit that substantive offense.

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL IX BANCO POPULAR DE Certiorari PUERTO RICO Procedente del Tribunal de Primera Recurrido Instancia, Sala

ALTENBERND, Judge. Herbert and Molly Cintron, individually and as parents of their daughter, Saleena, appeal a final summary judgment in their action against St. Joseph’s Hospital, Inc. In their complaint, the Cintrons claim that St. Joseph’s Hospital was liable for damages under section 395.1041, Florida Statutes (2004), because the hospital’s medical staff refused to treat their young daughter when she was suffering an acu

OPINION RAWLINSON, Circuit Judge: Pursuant to a contract with the United States Department of the Treasury, Appellant VSE Corporation (VSE) agreed to store and destroy fireworks that had been seized by the federal government. VSE challenges the district court’s order remanding to state court several actions that sought to impose liability on VSE for a de