Cases

JOY COSSICH LOBRANO, Judge. | iThis case involves an insurance coverage dispute arising from a wrongful death and products liability claim. The plaintiff/appellant, Lindsey King (“King”), individually and on behalf of her deceased minor child Peyton Wilt (“Wilt”), appeals the June 26, 2015 judgment of the district court granting summary judgment in favor of defendant/appellee, Old Republic Insurance Company (“Old Republic”),

Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. G, No. 15-2377; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2016-CA-0170. JjDenied. HUGHES, J., would grant.

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT CHRISTINA REISS, Chief Judge. . Plaintiff Wayne Burwelí ’ (“Plaintiff’) brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state law against the Town of Hartford (“Hartford”), Hartford' Police Chief Glenn Cutting (“Chief Cutting”), and Hartford police officers Kristinnah Adams (“Officer Adams”), Fredrick Peyto

Opinion of the Court by Justice SCHRODER. This case interprets KRS 620.050, which provides civil and criminal immunity to the *289reporters of suspected child dependency, neglect, and abuse. On the basis of that immunity, the Jefferson Circuit Court granted summary judgment in favor of Appellants Norton Hospitals, Inc. (Norton); Neonatal Intensive Care

Brown, J. ¶1 Tenant Niko’s Gourmet Inc. and its personal guarantors, Abir and Laith Elaimy, appeal the *677trial court’s summary judgment granting breach of lease damages to Peyton Building LLC. Peyton is the successor in interest to the leased property by a purchase agreement but is not an assignee of the lease or guarantee. Even so, the court enforced Niko’s relevant le

858 So.2d 156 (2003) Joseph Darnell PEYTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Mississippi, Appellee. No. 2002-KA-00924-COA. Court of Appeals of Mississippi. September 30, 2003. *157 Kellie Williamson Koenig, Greenville, James (Jay) R. Foster, Oxford, Attorneys for Appellant. Office of the Attorney General by Jeffrey A. Klingfuss, Att

OPINION MICHAEL, Circuit Judge. Today we take up one aspect of the bedeviling issue in bankruptcy law of how to deal with property held by debtors as tenants by the entirety. We hold that when a husband and wife in Virginia file a joint Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition, and they have — apart from their mortgage lender — only individual creditors, the two spouses may exempt a home they own as tenants by the e

312 F.3d 145 In re Peter A. BUNKER; In re Michelina P. Bonanno, Debtors.Peter A. BUNKER; Michelina P. Bonanno, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.Gordon P. PEYTON, Trustee, Defendant-Appellant.In re Joseph Michael Thomas; In re Myrtle Anne Thomas, Debtors.Joseph Michael Thomas; Myrtle Anne Thomas, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.Gordon P. Peyton, Trustee, Defendant-Appellant. No. 01-2071. N

210 Va. 194 (1969) C. C. PEYTON, SUPERINTENDENT OF THE VIRGINIA STATE PENITENTIARY v. BILLY WAYNE KING. Record No. 7065. Supreme Court of Virginia. September 5, 1969. Present, All the Justices. 1. Voluntary and intelligent plea of guilty by accused is self-supplied conviction and waiver of all defenses other than those jurisdictional. Appeal does not lie.</

945 N.E.2d 150 (2011) Tom GEORGE, Chris Vitron, Lori Chapko, and Edward Snead, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Appellants (Plaintiffs below), v. NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, Appellee (Defendant below). No. 94S00-1010-CQ-544. Supreme Court of Indiana. April 21, 2011. *151 William N. Riley, J

MEMORANDUM ORDER JED S. RAKOFF, District Judge. By “bottom-line” Order dated October 12, 2012, the Court, after full consideration of the parties’ briefing and oral argument, granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the amended complaint in the above-captioned case pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and 23.1(b). This Memorandum Order explains that ruling and directs the entry of

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. NO OPINION. *630See Rule 53(a)(1), (a)(2)(B), and (a)(2)(E), Ala.R.App.P.; Alabama Catalog Sales v. Harris, 794 So.2d 312 (Ala.2000). HOOPER, C.J., and MADDOX, HOUSTON, BROWN, JOHNSTONE, and ENGLAND, JJ., concur. SEE and LYONS, JJ., dissent.

JIJONES, Judge. Defendant, Dillard Department Stores, Inc. (Dillard), seeks review of the trial court’s judgment denying its Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff instituted the present suit seeking damages for injuries allegedly sustained when she hit her ankle on a clothing shelf in one of Dillard’s stores. On September 15, 1997, the Motion for Summary Judgment came on for hearing, and was denied.

ORDER HANCOCK, Senior District Judge. This cause came on for consideration at the regularly scheduled motion docket held November 1, 1996 in Birmingham, Alabama. The court has before it defendant’s September 18, 1996 motion to strike plaintiffs expert designation and defendant’s October 15, 1996 motion to strike plaintiffs request for admissions. Defendant seeks to strike plaintiffs ex

Matter of Hanford v Hanford (2025 NY Slip Op 00446) Matter of Hanford v Hanford 2025 NY Slip Op 00446 Decided on January 29, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary L

Abayomi v Guevara (2023 NY Slip Op 01880) Abayomi v Guevara 2023 NY Slip Op 01880 Decided on April 12, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. <

615 A.2d 222 (1992) CAFRITZ COMPANY, Petitioner, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA RENTAL HOUSING COMMISSION, Respondent. Joseph ROGERS, Petitioner, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA RENTAL HOUSING COMMISSION, Respondent. Nos. 91-AA-845, 91-AA-859. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued September 4, 1992. Decided October 16, 1992. As Changed Oct

TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge: In this case, a former teacher in the Birmingham, Alabama school system contends that the Board of Education and the Superintendent of Schools denied her equal protection of the laws, in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment and 42 U.S.C. § 1983, when they failed to appoint her principal of an elementary school because of her race and sex.

ISHEE, JUSTICE, FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. The main issue presented by this case is whether NRG Wholesale Generation's proffered expert used an acceptable method to determine the "true value" of its power plant in computing ad valorem tax. NRG's expert used a mixture of the sales-comparison approach, the income approach, and the cost approach to determine the true value of the facility. Lori P

SECTION: R ORDER AND REASONS SARAH S. VANCE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This case is a securities class action brought on behalf of all persons who purchased ATP Oil & Gas Corporation’s common stock in the public market between December 16, 2010 and ATP’s bankruptcy filing on August 17, 2012 (“the Class Period”). Because it is in bankruptcy proceedings, ATP is not named as a