Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
17 opinions for “Joseph Philip Cappucci”
In Re Cysive, Inc. Shareholders Litigationpublic domain
836 A.2d 531 (2003) In re CYSIVE, INC. SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION. C.A. No. 20341. Court of Chancery of Delaware, New Castle County. Submitted August 5, 2003. Decided August 15, 2003. *533 Norman M. Monhait, Rosenthal, Monhait, Gross & Goddess, P.A., Wilmington; Jeffrey H. Squire, Kirby McInerney & Squire, L.L.P., N
In Re Short Sale Antitrust Litigationpublic domain
527 F.Supp.2d 253 (2007) In re SHORT SALE ANTITRUST LITIGATION. No. 06 Civ. 2859(VM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. December 20, 2007. *254 Vincent R. Cappucci, Harold F. McGuire, Jr., Jeffrey Alan Klafter, Robert N Cappucci, Stephen D. Oestreich, Entwistle & Cappucci LLP, New York, NY, Shannon Lee Hopkins, Milberg Wei
Deangelis v. Corzinepublic domain
DECISION AND ORDER VICTOR MARRERO, District Judge. On April 23 and May 7, 2012, the Judicial Panel on Multidistriet Litigation (the “MDL Panel”) consolidated before this Court various civil actions arising out of the events that precipitated the bankruptcy of MF Global Holdings Ltd. (“MF Global”). (See Conditional MDL Transfer In Orders, In re: MF Global Holdings Ltd. Investment Litigati
In Re Cardinal Health Inc. Securities Litigationspublic domain
528 F.Supp.2d 752 (2007) In re CARDINAL HEALTH INC. SECURITIES LITIGATIONS, Plaintiff, This Document Relates To: All Securities Actions. No. C2-04-575. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. December 31, 2007. *753 *754 John R. Climaco, Scott D. Simpkins, Climaco Lefkowitz Peca
Koehler v. Greenpublic domain
370 F.Supp.2d 904 (2005) J. Michael KOEHLER, Plaintiff, v. Martin M. GREEN, Jules Brody, Martin D. Chitwood, Donald H. Clooney, Joe D. Jacobson, Jonathan F. Andres, Vincent R. Cappucci, Andrew J. Entwistle, Green Schaaf & Jacobson, P.C., Stull Stull and Brody, LLP, Chitwood and Harley, LLP, Clooney and Anderson, PC Defendants. No. CV 405-367-JFN. United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern
In Re Baker Hughes Securities Litigationpublic domain
136 F.Supp.2d 630 (2001) In re BAKER HUGHES SECURITIES LITIGATION No. CIV.A. H-99-4281. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. March 30, 2001. *631 *632 Daniel J. Petroski, Jr., Vahldiek, Cano, Grayson, Hovenkamp & Petroski; Jeffrey M. Haber, Timothy J. MacFall, Joseph R. Seid
In Re Cardinal Health, Inc. Securities Litigationpublic domain
(2008) In re CARDINAL HEALTH, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION. This Document Relates To: All Securities Actions. Case No. 04-CV-575. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. May 5, 2008. OPINION & ORDER ALGENON L. MARBLEY, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Objectors to a class-action settlement move for attorney
In Re Cardinal Health Inc. Securities Litigationspublic domain
426 F.Supp.2d 688 (2006) In re CARDINAL HEALTH INC. SECURITIES LITIGATIONS, Plaintiff, This Document Relates to: All Securities Actions. No. C2-04-575. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. April 12, 2006. *689 *690 *691
Deangelis v. Corzinepublic domain
DECISION AND ORDER VICTOR MARRERO, District Judge. *165TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION........................................................166 II. BACKGROUND.........................................................168 A. THE PARTIES......................................................1
13-3992-cv (L) In re: Tribune Company Fraudulent Conveyance Litigation 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 August Term, 2014 4 5 (Argued: November 5, 2014 Decided: March 29, 2016) 6 7 Docket Nos. 13-3992-cv; 13-3875-cv; 13-4178-cv; 13-4196-cv 8 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 9 10 IN RE: TRIBUNE COMPANY
13-3992-cv (L) In re: Tribune Company Fraudulent Conveyance Litigation 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 August Term, 2014 4 5 (Argued: November 5, 2014 Decided: March 24, 2016) 6 7 Docket Nos. 13-3992-cv; 13-3875-cv; 13-4178-cv; 13-4196-cv 8 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 9 10 IN RE: TRIBUNE COMPANY F
13-3992-cv(L) In re: Tribune Company Fraudulent Conveyance Litigation In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit ________________________ August Term, 2014 Nos. 13-3992-cv; 13-3875-cv; 13-4178-cv; 13-4196-cv IN RE: TRIBUNE COMPANY FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE LITIGATION NOTE HOLDERS, Deutsche Bank Trust Compan
In Re Enron Corp. Securitiespublic domain
586 F.Supp.2d 732 (2008) In re ENRON CORPORATION SECURITIES, DERIVATIVE & "ERISA" LITIGATION. Mark Newby, et al., Plaintiffs v. Enron Corporation, et al., Defendants. No. MDL-1446. Civ.A. No. H-01-3624. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. September 8, 2008. *735 Richard J. Zook, Cunningham Darlow e
In Re Enron Corp. Sec., Derivative & ERISA Lit.public domain
258 F.Supp.2d 576 (2003) In Re ENRON CORPORATION SECURITIES, DERIVATIVE & "ERISA LITIGATION" This Document Relates to: All Cases Mark Newby, et al., Plaintiffs v. Enron Corporation, et al., Defendants The Regents of The University of California, et al., Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. Kenneth L. Lay, et al., Defendants. No. MD-1446, CIV.A.H-01-3624.
235 F.Supp.2d 549 (2002) In re ENRON CORPORATION SECURITIES, DERIVATIVE & ERISA LITIGATION. This Document Relates to All Cases. Mark Newby, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Enron Corporation, et al., Defendants. The Regents of the University of California, et al., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. Kenneth L. Lay, et al., Defendants. MDL No. 1446 Civil Action No. H-01-36
ORDER GRANTING SHAREHOLDER DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS, OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR A STAY MARTIN GLENN, United States Bankruptcy Judge Pending before the Court are the following motions (collectively, the “Motions”): (i) Shareholder Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, or, in the Alternative, for a Stay (the “Fund 1 Motion,” Adv. Pro. No. 10-04609, ECF Doc. #2387) and (ii) Shareholder De
ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS