Cases

COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE LOREN MITCHELL LEONARD L. WILLIAMS JUSTICE CENTER MAGISTRATE IN CHANCERY 500 NORTH KING STREET, SUITE 11400 WILMINGTON, DE 19801-3734

MOTT, HISTORY On February 28, 1991, the plaintiffs filed a complaint against the defendants alleging that Catherine Cruz suffered a median nerve injury as a result of a negligently performed cardiac catherization or a negligently performed brachial arteiy bypass. At one point during her treatment for pain and numbness in her right arm and back, Catherine Cruz sought a second opinion from John

314 Pa. Superior Ct. 177 (1983) 460 A.2d 824 ESTATE of Rodman WANAMAKER, Deceased. Appeal of Edwin P. ROME and the Executors of the Estate of Morton P. Rome, Deceased. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued February 4, 1983. Filed May 20, 1983. *179 Marvin Comisky, Philadelphia, for appellants. Joseph W

10 Kan. App. 2d 99 (1984) 692 P.2d 397 WAYNE LEWIS, d/b/a LEWIS EXCAVATION, Appellant, v. WANAMAKER BAPTIST CHURCH, Appellee. No. 56,233 Court of Appeals of Kansas. Opinion filed December 20, 1984. Joseph D. Johnson, of Topeka, for appellant. Louis F. Eisenbarth and Ruth E. Graham, of Sloan, Listrom, Eisenbarth, Sl

RULING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT MICHAEL P. SHEA, District Judge. After reviewing the record, the Court OVERRULES the Defendant’s Objection [Doc. # 95] and ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Garfinkel’s Recommended Ruling [Doc. # 90]. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. # 63] is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, as set forth in Magistrate Judge Garfinkel’s Recommended Ruling. The Court adds on

Opinion by Judge Wilkinson, Claimant was injured on April 21,1 1972, and received workmen’s compensation benefits for the period of her original disability and during a subsequent relapse. Claimant returned to work on January 9, 1973, as a buyer’s clerk and signed a final receipt. Her position was terminated on June 22,1973, due to computerization. On February 1,1974, she filed a p

Opinion by Hoffman, J., This is an appeal from the order of the court below quashing appellant’s appeal from a compulsory arbitration award. *253Appellant (hereinafter, “plaintiff”) commenced an assumpsit action in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia against the appellee, John Wanamaker, Inc. (hereinafter, “original defendant”)

Hunter, J., Testator by the thirty-third item of his will gave the ultimate residue of his estate to be used in the “building of a Home for Boys, in the City of Philadelphia, whose misdemeanors have subjected them to the law, and, for want of any other place are disgraced by being committed to the House of Correction, and other Institutions, that there may be a proper place for temporary detention, at the discretion of the Judges

364 Pa. 248 (1950) Wanamaker Estate. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued January 6, 1950. March 20, 1950. *249 Before MAXEY, C.J., DREW, LINN, STERN, STEARNE and JONES, JJ. J. Willison Smith, Jr., with him Samuel L. Sagendorph, for The Bethany Collegiate Presbyterian Church and Bethany Brotherhood, appellants.

Argued April 9, 1934. Plaintiff filed her bill in equity, in her own right and on behalf of her minor children, against her husband, John Wanamaker, Jr., praying that he be enjoined from obtaining a divorce from her in Nevada or elsewhere outside of Pennsylvania. On the same day that the bill was filed a preliminary injunction was issued ex parte on plaintiff's affidavit. Shortly after the filing of the bill Theodore Lane Bean, Esq., presented his petition to the court below, asking le

Argued October 13, 1937. Complaint was made before Magistrate McBride by a police officer of the City of Philadelphia charging John Wanamaker with violation of the Traffic and Parking Ordinance, approved October 21, 1936. After *Page 530 hearing, the defendant was adjudged guilty and ordered to pay the costs. An appeal was duly allowed to the Court of Quarter Sessions and a hearing de novo had before Judge MILLAR who, after full consideration of th

OPINION By THE COURT. Submitted by the defendants upon a general demurrer to the petition in that it does not state facts which show a cause of action. At the time of the hearing on the demurrer the members of the Court expressed their opinion as to the sufficiency of the averments of the petition to justify the issuance of the writ sought. We granted counsel opportunity to brief the q

Per Curiam. Counsel for appellees filed motions, to dismiss the appeals for the reason that the same are moot. Upon consideration thereof, the court finds said motions not well taken and overrules the same. As to case No. 34004, Section 2731.01, Revised Code, defines mandamus as follows: “Mandamus is a writ, issued in the name of the state to an inferior tribunal, a corporation, bo

This appeal by the ancillary administrator c. t. a. of the Estate of John Wanamaker, Jr., challenges the validity of parts of the will of his father, Rodman Wanamaker, on the ground that they violate the rule against perpetuities, in establishing a trust of the capital stock *Page 243 of the corporation, John Wanamaker Philadelphia. The amount involved is large. Rodman Wanamaker was the owner of all of the capital stock of John Wanamaker Philadelphia and

Per Curiam, The decree of the court below is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Milner. Costs to be paid by the appellant.

Per Curiam. It is the duty of the clerk of this court, in the absence of instructions from the court to the contrary, to accept for filing any paper presented to him, provided such paper is not scurrilous or obscene, is properly prepared and is accompanied by the requisite filing fee. The power to make any decision as to the propriety of any paper submitted or as to the right of a person to file such paper is vested i

Dallingee, Judge: This is a suit against the United States, arising •at the port of Philadelphia, brought to recover certain customs duties alleged to have been'improperly exacted upon a particular importation of glass bottles with metal tops. Duty was levied thereon at the rate of 8K cents per pound and 40 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 339 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as table or household utensils composed in chief value

Motion for reargument or for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied, with ten dollars costs. Motion for a stay granted pending the granting or final refusal by the Court of Appeals of leave to appeal, upon appellant’s filing the undertaking required by section 593 of the Civil Practice Act. Present — Martin, P. J., Merrell, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.

Action for personal injuries sustained by infant plaintiff by reason of the falling upon said infant of a marble bird bath or urn in defendants’ store, and for loss of services and medical expenses. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Merrell, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.

WILLIAM H. WANAMAKER, JR., AND BESSIE D. BREMER, PETITIONERS, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.Wanamaker v. CommissionerDocket Nos. 11136, 12689.United States Board of Tax Appeals