Cases

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCMF-XX-XXXXXXX 22-SEP-2025 02:29 PM

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA17-1249 Filed: 7 August 2018 McDowell County, 15 CRS 625, 15 CRS 51084 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. JEFFERY DANIEL WAYCASTER Appeal by defendant from judgments entered 16 May 2017 by Judge Gary M. Gavenus in McDowell County Superior Court. Heard in the Court of Appeals 5 June 2018. Attorney General Joshua H. Stein, by Assist

BERGER, Judge. On August 31, 2017, a McDowell County jury convicted Jeffery Daniel Waycaster ("Defendant") of possession or transportation of five or more counterfeit instruments. Defendant admitted to having attained habitual felon status, and he was sentenced to 102 to 135 months in prison. Defendant appeals, arguing that the trial court erred by (1) denying his motion to dismiss for insufficiency of the evidence, and (2) awarding

564 F.3d 1301 (2009) Bobbie HARRIS, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, United States of America, Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MEXICAN SPECIALTY FOODS, INC., d.b.a. La Paz Restaurante & Cantina, Defendant-Appellee. Julie Best Grimes, individually and as representative of all other persons similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, Nimrod W.E. Long, III, et al., Plaintiffs, Uni

Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Certain Claims in Plaintiff’s Fourth Amended Complaint YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION Now before the Court is defendants’ motion to dismiss certain claims in the Fourth Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 244 (“4AC”) of plaintiff AngioScore, Inc. (“AngioScore”) pursuant to Federal R

552 F.Supp.2d 1302 (2008) Julie Best GRIMES, etc. Plaintiff, v. RAVE MOTION PICTURES BIRMINGHAM, L.L.C., et al., Defendants. Bobbie Harris, etc., Plaintiff, v. Mexican Speciality Foods, Inc., d/b/a La Paz Restaurante & Cantina, Defendant. Edmund Rush, etc., Plaintiff, v. Hooters of East Birmingham, Defendant. William C. Floyd, etc. Plaintiff, v. Express Oil Change, L.L.C., Defendant. C

TRANSFER ORDER KATHRYN H. VRATIL, Acting Chairman. Before the Panel:* Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, plaintiffs in the Northern *1333District of California Pipkin action move to centralize this litigation in the Northern District of California. Plaintiffs in the District of Delaware Pacilli action m

Order on Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss State Law Claims; Motions for Summary Judgment on State Law Claims; Motions in Limine re State Law Experts YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS, District Judge Now before the Court are three categories of motions: (1) defendants’ motion to dismiss the state law claims in this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction; (2) the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment on s

270 F.Supp.2d 1368 (2003) Natalie Meleck MURPHY, as Next Friend of Joshua Murphy, Plaintiff, v. AVENTIS PASTEUR, INC., Individually and as Successor-in-interest to Connaught Laboratories, Inc., Pasteur Merieux, and Pasteur Merieux Connaught; Wyeth (f/k/a American Home Products Corporation); Smithkline Beecham Corporation, d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline; *1369 Eli Lilly and Company; Merck & Co., Inc.; Georgia Power

HIGGINBOTHAM, J. J.S.1 was charged by petition in juvenile court with accessory after the fact in the commission of attempted first degree murder, a violation of La. R.S. 14:30, La. R.S. 14:27, and La. R.S. 14:25 (count 1), and illegal possession of a firearm by a juvenile, a violation of La. R.S. 14:95.8 (count 2). J.S. denied the allegations. J.S. filed motions to suppress and quash, which the juvenile

[Cite as State v. Melms, 2018-Ohio-1947.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY STATE OF OHIO : : Plaintiff-Appellee : C.A. CASE NO. 27685 : v. :

HIGGINBOTHAM, J. J.S.1 was charged by petition in juvenile court with accessory after the fact in the commission of attempted first degree murder, a violation of La. R.S. 14:30, La. R.S. 14:27, and La. R.S. 14:25 (count 1), and illegal possession of a firearm by a juvenile, a violation of La. R.S. 14:95.8 (count 2). J.S. denied the allegations. J.S. filed motions to suppress and quash, which the juvenile

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER LEFKOW, District Judge. This case is a putative class action brought against defendants, NeoPharm, Inc. (“NeoPharm”), James M. Huffey (“Huffey”), and Inram Ahmad (“Ahmad”) (collectively “defendants”), alleging violations of § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b), Rule 10b-5 promulgated under § 78j(b), and § 20(a) of the Act, 1

On motion of F. Aaron Negangard, Chief Deputy Attorney General of the State of Indiana, and Cathleen M. Shrader, President of the State Board of Law Examiners, both members of the Bar of this Court, each applicant named in Exhibit A is by Order of this Court now duly sworn and admitted to practice as an attorney at law, and their respective names are ordered entered upon the Roll of Attorneys of this Court in the office of the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Cou

WILLHITE, J. *632A defendant charged with a misdemeanor has a right under Penal Code 1 section 1382 to be brought to trial within 45 days after arraignment if the defendant is not in custody at that time.2 ( § 1382, subd. (a)(3).) If, however, the defendant requests or consents to the setting of a trial date after

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA19-474 Filed: 15 December 2020 Buncombe County, Nos. 18 CRS 85370-71, 85783-84 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. LEWIE P. ROBINSON Appeal by defendant by writ of certiorari from judgments entered 5 December 2018 by Judge Marvin P. Pope, Jr., in Buncombe County Superior Court. Heard in the Court of Appeals 22 January 2020. Attorney General J

Filed 9/5/18 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR ALEXANDER POGOSYAN, No. B288362 Petitioner, (App. Div. No. BS172108) (Tony L. Richardson, v. Sanjay Kumar,

1 2025 CO 3 Nonhuman Rights Project, Inc., Petitioner-

NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. DATE: 07/16/2024 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 15:10:52 NON-COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr ACTIVE

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2056 G. G., by his next friend and mother, Deirdre Grimm, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GLOUCESTER COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, Defendant - Appellee. ------------------------ JUDY CHIASSON, Ph. D., School Administrator California; DAVID VANNASDALL, School Administrator California; DIANA K. BRUCE,