Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
19 opinions for “Joshua Mielke”
State v. Mielkepublic domain
[Cite as State v. Mielke, 2013-Ohio-1612.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO WARREN COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : CASE NO. CA2012-08-079 Plaintiff-Appellee, : OPINION
McKay v. Vitas Healthcare Corp. of Illinoispublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MATTHEW F. KENNELLY, District Judge: Jacquelyn McKay is a former employee of Vitas Healthcare Corporation of Illinois. McKay has filed suit against Vitas, alleging discrimination, retaliation, and the creation of a hostile work environment in violation of both the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Illinois Human Rights Act (IHRA). McKay has also alleged age disc
Kolowski v. Metropolitan Life Insurancepublic domain
35 F.Supp.2d 1059 (1998) Nancy J. KOLOWSKI, Robert Kolowski and Joshua Kolowski Plaintiffs, v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. No. 97 C 6811. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. November 24, 1998. Robert M. Foote, Craig S. Mielke, Murphy, Hupp, Foote, Mielke & Kinnally, Aurora, IL, for Plaintiffs. Thomas James Pi
Clark v. TAP Pharmaceutical Products, Inc.public domain
798 N.E.2d 123 (2003) 343 Ill. App.3d 538 278 Ill.Dec. 276 Acie C. CLARK, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TAP PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS, INC., Tap Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Abbott Laboratories, Inc., Defendants-Appellants. No. 5-02-0316. Appellate Court of Illinois, Fifth District.
Clark v. Tap Pharmaceutical Products, Inc.public domain
PRESIDING JUSTICE HOPKINS delivered the opinion of the court: The defendants, TAP Pharmaceutical Products, Inc., TAP Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Abbott Laboratories, Inc., appeal the circuit court’s order denying the defendants’ motion to transfer venue from Williamson County to Lake County on the grounds of forum non conveni
Lafleur v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.public domain
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Raymond A. Jackson, United States District Judge This matter comes before the Court on a third Joint Motion for Approval of Settlement brought by Plaintiffs Theresa Croy, Kimberly Cruz, and Dee Crouch, on behalf of themselves and the 4,209 opt-in Plaintiffs in the collective group they represent (“Plaintiffs”), and Defendant Dollar Tree Stores, Inc., d/b/a
Roberts Ex Rel. Roberts v. Patelpublic domain
620 F.Supp. 323 (1985) Kris ROBERTS, as Guardian and Next Friend of Joshua Roberts, a Minor, Plaintiff, v. Dr. V.K. PATEL, Dr. Johnson Dy, Dr. Malawka, Dr. J.M. Cava, Dr. Robert Lee and Christ Hospital, Defendants. No. 84 C 3926. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D. September 27, 1985. *324 William C. Murphy and Robe
South v. Lujanpublic domain
OPINION BUSTAMANTE, Judge. {1} Plaintiff-Appellant Tiffany South — a former officer with the Sandia Pueblo Police Department (Plaintiff) filed a complaint for violation of the New Mexico Human Rights Act (NMHRA), retaliatory discharge, and tortious inference with contract against Defendants-Appellees Isaac Lujan, Willi
State v. McCollumpublic domain
[Cite as State v. McCollum, 2015-Ohio-3286.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO CLERMONT COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : CASE NO. CA2014-11-077 Plaintiff-Appellee, : OPINION
Sipp v. Buffalo Thunderpublic domain
Office of the New Mexico Director Compilation Commission 11:12:40 2024.04.25 '00'06- IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO Opinion Num
LaFleur v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RAYMOND A. JACKSON, District Judge. Before the Court is Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.’s (“Defendant” or “Dollar Tree”) Mo*466tion to Decertify the Collective Action. Defendant filed its Motion to Decertify (ECF No. 405) on September 13, 2013 and its Corrected Memorandum in Support of the Motion (ECF No. 407) on Se
Clark v. TAP Pharmaceutical Products, Inc.public domain
772 N.E.2d 271 (2002) 331 Ill. App.3d 628 265 Ill.Dec. 233 Acie C. CLARK, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TAP PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS, INC., TAP Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Abbott Laboratories, Inc., Defendants-Appellants. No. 5-02-0101. Appellate Court of Illinois, Fifth District.
State v. Khalifpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Khalif, 2024-Ohio-2239.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 23AP-274 (C.P.C. No. 21CR-2682) v. :
Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (2021 NY Slip Op 05388) BODY { font-family : "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size : larger; } P { line-height: 150%; text-indent: 2em } Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law 468-a
Matter of Attorneys Inviolation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (2024 NY Slip Op 04648) Matter of Attorneys Inviolation of Judiciary Law § 468-a 2024 NY Slip Op 04648 Decided on September 26, 2024 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by
In Re Toyota Motor Corp.public domain
785 F.Supp.2d 883 (2011) In re TOYOTA MOTOR CORP. Unintended Acceleration Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation. This Document Relates To: All Foreign Plaintiffs' Economic Loss Cases. Case No. 8:10ML 02151 JVS (FMOx). United States District Court, C.D. California. April 8, 2011. *888 Andrea Bierstein, Clinton
Sunglory Maritime, Ltd. v. PHI, Inc.public domain
SECTION: “G” (5) JUDGMENT AND REASONS NANNETTE JOLIVETTE BROWN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter came before the Court for trial without a jury from March 17, 2016, to March 18, 2016.1 The Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1333, which confers on the federal district courts original jurisdiction over admiralt
MEMORANDUM OPINION R. DAVID PROCTOR, District Judge. This matter is before the court on various Motions to Dismiss filed by Defendants. (Docs. # 107, 108, 110, 112-14, 116, 119, 121, 122, 125, and 135). On April 9, 2014, the court heard argument on certain aspects of the Motions to Dismiss with general application to Defendants and both categories of Plaintiffs. After careful review and with th
Marsh v. Smithpublic domain
Bullard, J. This is a petitory. action in which the plaintiff claims title to a tract of land in the parish of St. Mary, at a place called Les Cotes, or Isles de la Petite Anse, surrounding other tracts of land belonging to different persons, and divided into several small tracts so as to contain together about five hundred and *519fifty-two acres, grant