⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Joyce Fletcher”

State v. Fletcherpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014-06-18 · Published · cited 7× · 263 Or. App. 630; 330 P.3d 659; 2014 WL 2769140; 2014 Ore. App. LEXIS 806
DEVORE, J. Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for second-degree assault, ORS 163.175.1 Defendant does not assign error to his convictions on two counts of coercion and one count of harassment. Defendant assigns error to the trial court’s ruling that defendant could not contend, in closing argument, that the state must prove, but had not, that defendant intended or knew that he used a danger
District Court, S.D. Texas · 2011-12-13 · Published · cited 2× · 830 F. Supp. 2d 286; 2011 WL 6370048; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 148659
ORDER VANESSA D. GILMORE, District Judge. Pending before the Court is Defendant Vanliner Insurance Company’s Motion for Summary Judgment. (Instrument No. 13). I. A. Plaintiff Mari Kaye Lasewicz (“Plaintiff’ or “Lasewicz”) is an individual residing in Houston, Texas. (Instrument No. 13-7, at 3). She moved from Bristol, Connecticut to Ho
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018-07-13 · Published · cited 23× · 895 F.3d 1010
SMITH, Chief Judge. St. Louis Police Department (SLPD) Officers Nicholas Martorano and John Moton appeal from the district court's 1 judgment, entered upon a jury verdict, finding that *1013 they used excessive force in the
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007-10-15 · Published · cited 46× · 936 A.2d 87; 2007 Pa. Super. 310; 2007 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3502; 2007 WL 2984153
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 89 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 90 ¶ 1 This is an appeal from a judgment entered in favor of Appellee David Szymanski ("Szymanski") and against Appellant Flet
People v. Fletcherpublic domain
Michigan Court of Appeals · 2004-05-04 · Published · cited 110× · 679 N.W.2d 127; 260 Mich. App. 531
679 N.W.2d 127 (2004) 260 Mich. App. 531 PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael John FLETCHER, Defendant-Appellant. Docket No. 229092. Court of Appeals of Michigan. Submitted February 5, 2003, at Detroit. Decided February 10, 2004, at 9:10 a.m. Released for Publication May 4, 2004.
Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983-10-19 · Published · cited 0× · 137 Ariz. 497; 671 P.2d 938; 1983 Ariz. App. LEXIS 556
OPINION HATHAWAY, Judge. This is an appeal from a modification of a divorce decree reducing the amount to be paid by appellee/husband as child support. The parties were divorced in January 1980. The decree of dissolution provided, inter alia, that appellee pay $250 per month as child support for his daughter. At the time of the divorce, appellee was working for ASARCO earning approximately $19,500 net per
Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland) · 2005-07-28 · Published · cited 34× · 166 S.W.3d 479; 2005 WL 1405733
166 S.W.3d 479 (2005) CITY OF HOUSTON and Susan McMillian, in her individual capacity, Appellants, v. Juanita FLETCHER, Appellee. No. 11-03-00200-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Eastland. June 9, 2005. Rehearing Overruled July 28, 2005. *482 Eliot P. Tucker, Roy L. Barnes, Tucker/Vaughan, Donald J. Fleming, Senior
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2002-01-10 · Published · cited 41× · 63 S.W.3d 920; 2002 Tex. App. LEXIS 202; 87 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1545; 2002 WL 27406
63 S.W.3d 920 (2002) The CITY OF HOUSTON and Susan McMillian, Appellants, v. Juanita FLETCHER, Appellee. No. 14-01-00159-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.). January 10, 2002. *921 Rhonda Denice Walls, Houston, for appellants. Joyce Keating, Houston, for appellee. Panel consists of Justices YATES, FO
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017-12-04 · Published · cited 2× · 876 F.3d 502
OPINION OF THE COURT JORDAN, Circuit Judge. Today we stop swimming against the tide of opinion on an important question of maritime law. Following the lead of several of .our sister circuits, we now hold that a union contract freely entered by a seafarer—a contract that includes rates of maintenance, cure, and unearned
Tennessee Supreme Court · 1980-08-25 · Published · cited 11× · 603 S.W.2d 734; 1980 Tenn. LEXIS 489
*735OPINION COOPER, Justice. Michael Shane Fletcher and his mother, Joyce Collins Fletcher, brought this action to recover damages for injuries sustained by Michael when he was attacked and bitten by a dog owned by the defendants. The attack occurred on the premises of the defendants where Michael had gone in company with his grandparents to visit the de
Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2016-04-27 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 15-0309 Filed April 27, 2016 STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. JOSEPH ROBERT JOYCE JR., Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Black Hawk County, George L. Stigler, Judge. Defendant appeals his convictions for first-degree burglary and domestic
Bahler v. Fletcherpublic domain
Oregon Supreme Court · 1970-09-11 · Published · cited 62× · 474 P.2d 329; 257 Or. 1; 1970 Ore. LEXIS 243
474 P.2d 329 (1970) Al C. BAHLER Aka Alfred C. Bahler and Roselle Bahler, Dba A.R. John Construction, Appellants and Cross-Respondents, v. John H. FLETCHER and Hazel Joy R. Fletcher, Respondents and Cross-Appellants. Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc. Argued and Submitted March 4, 1970. Decided September 11, 1970. Rehearing Denied November 4, 1970. D
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995-02-01 · Published · cited 11× · 46 F.3d 950; 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 813; 95 Daily Journal DAR 1475; 75 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 758; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 1873; 1995 WL 36100
*951 HUG, Circuit Judge: This case presents the question of whether research expenditures made by a partnership, that was formed in order to develop new technology, were incurred in connection with the partnership’s trade or business, so as to be deductible expenses under 26 U.S.C. § 174. William Scoggi
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1970-02-05 · Published · cited 0× · 216 Pa. Super. 783; 261 A.2d 110
Judgment of sentence affirmed.
Fletcher v. Murphypublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998-04-09 · Published · cited 16× · 249 A.D.2d 638; 670 N.Y.S.2d 809; 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3884
—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule. We confirm the determination that found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule prohibiting inmates from using controlled substances. Initially, inasmuch as the record reveals that every re
Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983-10-19 · Published · cited 6× · 671 P.2d 938; 137 Ariz. 496
137 Ariz. 496 (1983) 671 P.2d 938 Linda Joyce FLETCHER, Petitioner/Appellant, v. James William FLETCHER, Respondent/Appellee. No. 2 CA-CIV 4760. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2. October 19, 1983. Henderson & Ollinger by Charles G. Ollinger, III, Tucson, for petitioner/appellant. Lingeman & Bock by Richard C. Bock and La
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2013-09-19 · Published · cited 1× · 2013 IL App (1st) 120687
ILLINOIS OFFICIAL REPORTS Appellate Court Duemer v. Edward T. Joyce & Associates, P.C., 2013 IL App (1st) 120687 Appellate Court WALTER DUEMER et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. EDWARD T. Caption JOYCE AND ASSOCIATES, P.C., Defendant-Appellant. District & No. First District, Sixth Division Docket No. 1-12-0687 Filed Aug
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007-07-12 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 06-3094 ___________ Joyce M. Shockency; * John H. Moore, * * Plaintiffs - Appellees, * * v.
State v. Hillpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016-04-20 · Published · cited 8× · 277 Or. App. 751; 373 P.3d 162; 2016 Ore. App. LEXIS 483
NAKAMOTO, J. pro tempore Defendant was convicted of second-degree disorderly conduct, ORS 166.025, and fourth-degree assault, ORS 163.160, as a result of an incident at a casino owned and operated by the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation. In the trial court, defendant moved for dismissal of the case, arguing that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction. On appeal, he again asserts that the court
Joyce v. Coughlinpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995-09-21 · Published · cited 10× · 219 A.D.2d 777; 631 N.Y.S.2d 455; 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9522
Casey, J. Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, *778entered in Clinton County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule. Petitioner, while incarcerated at Clinton Correctional Facility in Clin