Cases

158 S.W.3d 96 (2005) Edwin OWENS, M.D., Appellant, v. Domingo PEREZ as Next Friend of Maria SAN JUANA MORIN, A Non Compos Mentis, Appellee. No. 13-01-00876-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi-Edinburg. February 3, 2005. Rehearing Overruled April 7, 2005. *100 Linda C. Breck, Thomas F. Nye, Robert W. Clo

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-20-00333-CV ___________________________ AYLAM ESPINOSA, Appellant V. JUANA PEREZ, Appellee On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1 Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 2020-005350-1 Before Wallach, J.; Sudderth, C.J.; and Walker, J. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL I Certiorari LUNA RESIDENTIAL III, LLC procedente del Tribunal de Parte Recurrida Primera Instancia, KLCE202401384 Sala Superior de v. Bayamón JUANA PÉREZ FUENTES,

OPINION AND ORDER DANIEL R. DOMINGUEZ, District Judge. Pending before the Court are: (a) Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support, Docket No. 50, (b) Defendants’ Supplemental Memorandum in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment, Docket No. 100, (c) Plaintiffs’ Opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support, Docket No. 73, and

650 F.3d 350 (2011) Luisa PEREZ; Elvin Francisco Gonza Osovio, Individually and on behalf of all persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. MOUNTAIRE FARMS, INCORPORATED, a Delaware Corporation; Mountaire Farms of Delaware, Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation, Defendants-Appellants, and Ray Barrientos; Maria Gomez; Juana Miguel; Gibran Moya Rivera; Gloria Paneto Castro; Shitwa Perez Lopez; Jose Antonio Santiag Lugo; Maritza Alcover

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 21a0233p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ JUANA DOMINGA RAMOS RAFAEL, │

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § No. 08-23-00075-CV ROBERT JOSEPH GAUDET, JR., § Appeal from the Appellant/Cross-Appellee, § 243rd Judicial District Court v.

Filed 9/18/20 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SEVEN THE PEOPLE, B301466 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. PA028774) v. LUIS ALFREDO PEREZ, Defendant and Appellant. APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Michael Te

OPINION AND ORDER JUSTO ARENAS, United States Chief Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the court on motion for judgment as a matter of law pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 50(b)(1)(C) filed by the co-defendants, Miguel Torres-Santiago and Gary Conde-González, on July 29, 2010. (Docket No. 310.) The co-defendants’ motion was opposed by plaintiff, Carmen Burgos-Yantin, on August 12, 2010. (Docket

Appeal by the mother from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Robin M. Kent, J.), dated April 27, 2016. The order, without a hearing, dismissed her custody petition. Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the petition is reinstated, and the matter is remitted to the Family Court, Nassau County, for a hearing and a new determination thereafte

669 F.Supp.2d 191 (2009) Carmen D. BURGOS-YANTIN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MUNICIPALITY OF JUANA DIAZ, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 07-1146 (GAG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. November 6, 2009. *193 Jose R. Olmo-Rodriguez, Olmo & Rodriguez Matias, San Juan, PR, Octavio M. Rivera-Bujosa, Rivera Bujosa La

MEMORANDUM ** The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The Clerk shall amend the docket to reflect this status. Petitioners seek review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision, dated September 29, 2006, denying petitioners’ second motion to reopen as numerically barred. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2). The regulations provide that “a party m

(2008) Higinia COSME-PÉREZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MUNICIPALITY OF JUANA DÍAZ; Ramón A. Hernández-Torres, Mrs. Hernández-Torres, and their Conjugal Partnership; Commonwealth of Puerto Rico; John Doe; Richard Doe; and their Respective Insurance Companies, Defendants. Civil No. 07-1942 (DRD). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. September 30, 2008. O

JUDGMENT. CARMEN CONSUELO CEREZO, District Judge. Having considered the analysis and conclusions set forth in the Magistrate-Judges Report and Recommendation filed on February 20, 2015 (D.E. 18), as well as the allegations raised in the pro se Complaint (D.E. 2) and the Amended Complaint filed on February 18, 2014 by the plaintiff before the Court of First Instance of the Commonwealth of Puerto Ric

OPINION AND ORDER Edward A. Godoy, U.S. Bankruptcy-Judge Plaintiff LM Waste Service Corp. (“LM Waste”) commenced the adversary proceeding of caption against the Municipality of Juana Diaz (the “Municipality”) for the turnover of property under section 542 of the Bankruptcy Code, collection of monies, and breach of contract and against Andres Reyes Burgos, Inc. (“ARB”) for the tor-tious interference with a se

ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL X LUIS ALBERTO PÉREZ APELACIÓN VILLANUEVA, procedente del Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Apelante, Sala Superior de KLAN202401136 Aguadilla. v.

Owens v. Perez NUMBER 13-01-00876-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

666 F.Supp.2d 894 (2009) Juana MONTANO-PEREZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DURRETT CHEESE SALES, INC., et al., Defendants. Case No. 3:08-1015. United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division. October 13, 2009. *896 Kristi L. Graunke, Southern Poverty Law Center, Montgomery, AL, Monica Ramirez, Southern Poverty Law Cent

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-14-00124-CV WESTFREIGHT SYSTEMS, INC., Appellant/Cross-Appellee v. John John Michael HEUSTON, Individually and as Dependent Administrator of t

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JAIME PEREZ-ENRIQUEZ,  Petitioner, No. 03-70244 v.  Agency No. A92-002-074 ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General, OPINION Respondent.  On Petition for Re