Cases

RIPPLE, Circuit Judge. Juana I. Gonzalez-Koeneke brought this action pro se, alleging that her government employer discriminated against her, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 1981, and 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Approximately ten weeks later, she filed an amended complaint. After she had retained counsel and after the defendants had filed a motion to d

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 02-3424 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. FREDERICK R. JAMES, Defendant-Appellant. ____________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois.

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL III JAILENNE LÓPEZ VEGA REVISIÓN JUDICIAL procedente de la Recurrente Junta Adjudicativa, Departamento de la v. TA2025RA00306 Familia, Región

534 F.3d 1320 (2008) Adelina GARCIA; Antonio Garcia; Jeronimo Vargas-Vera; Efrain Aguilar; Paulina Aguilar; Adelaida Aguirre; Jose R. Aguirre; Salvador Almanza; Miguel Amaya; Rogelio Andrade; Jesus Anguiano; Efigenia Arana; Jose R. Arana; Ramon Arana; Alma Armendariz; Jorge L. Banda Valadez; Delfino Barragan; Lucia Barragan; Ramon P. Barragan; Holga Benitez; Baltazar Bonilla; Maria Guadalupe Bonilla; Catalina Bustillos; Bernardo Calderon; Etelvina Calder

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS Re: Dkt. No. 27 HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR., United States District Judge Before the Court is Petitioner Rolando Fernandez’s (“Petitioner”) second-amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus, filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging the validity of a conviction obtained against him in state court. Dkt. No. 27 (“Pet.”). Respondent W.L.

OPINION PIERSOL, Senior District Judge: A jury found defendants Fernando Ca-zares, Gilbert Saldana, Alejandro Martinez, and Porfirio Avila guilty of violating 18 U.S.C. § 241 by conspiring to intimidate African-American citizens in the Highland Park neighborhood of Los Ange-les and to deprive them of their constitutional right to “purchase, lease and h

John Catalano and Ruth Catalano, et al., 1 Petitioners v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, RespondentCatalano v. CommissionerDocket Nos. 2506-80, 2878-80, 4885-80, 4886-80, 4976-80, 4977-80, 4978-80, 4979-80, 4981-80, 4982-

Volume 1 of 2 FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ROBERT CHARLES COMER,  Petitioner-Appellant, No. 98-99003 v. DORA B. SCHRIRO, Director, of  D.C. No. CV-94-01469-ROS Arizona Department of OPINION Corrections,

BACHARACH, Circuit Judge. A group of employees filed class and collective actions against Tyson Foods, Inc., seeking unpaid wages for time spent on pre- and post-shift activities. After the employees obtained a sizeable verdict and fee award, 1 Tyson unsuccessfully moved for judgment as a matter of law. On appeal, Tys

MURPHY, Circuit Judge. Defendants-appellants Tyson Foods, Inc. and Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc. (collectively, “Tyson”) appeal from the district court’s interlocutory order denying their motion for partial summary judgment. We ordered the parties to submit briefs addressing whether this appeal should be dismissed on the ground that the order appealed from was not final. Tyson argues that we have jurisdiction over the appeal under