Cases

ORDER JAMES C. FOX, Chief Judge. This matter is before the court on motions by the defendants to dismiss. Plaintiff has responded to the motions and the matter is ripe for disposition. On March 31, 1993, plaintiff filed with the North Carolina Office of Administrative Hearings (“OAH”) a Charge of racial discrimination by virtue of being subjected to a hostile work environmen

203 F.Supp.2d 1053 (2002) Marvin ROYCROFT, as the Administrator of the Estate of Patricia Lange, Plaintiff, v. John Q. HAMMONS and Juanita Hammons, Individually; JQH Hotels, Inc., John Q. Hammons Hotels, L.P., and John Q. Hammons Hotel Two, L.P., d/b/a University Park Holiday Inn, Defendants. No. 4:01-CV-40498. United States District Court, S.D. Iowa, Central Division. May 17,

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before FILED any court except for the purpose of Sep 13 2018, 10:37 am establishing the defense of res judicata, CLERK collateral estoppel, or the law of the Indiana Supreme Court

235 F.Supp.2d 966 (2002) Edwin C. WEST, Dennis Thiel, Matthew Bennett, Robert Addington and Perry Bernal, Plaintiffs, v. Phil MACHT, Byran Bartow, Colleen Collier, Mario Canziani, Kurt Schwebke, Juanita Echeverria, Virginia Wojdac, Scott Trippe, Mark Christian and Mary Enders-Muraski, Defendants. No. 99-C-0147. United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. December 3, 2002.

899 F.Supp. 1457 (1995) Marian P. BOOTH, Plaintiff, v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH & NATURAL RESOURCES; Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary of N.C. Dept. of Environment, Health & Natural Resources; Brenda Buck Griffin; Sharon Eason; Pat Cumbo and Juanita Tripp, Defendants. No. 4:95-CV-52-F3. United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Eastern Division.

Ruffin, Judge. Mary J. Pierce sued Golden Corral Corporation for injuries she sustained when she slipped and fell on a foreign substance in Golden Corral’s parking lot. The trial court granted Golden Corral’s motion for summary judgment, and Pierce appeals. Because issues of fact remain as to Golden Corral’s liability, we reverse. It is well established that on appeal of a grant of summary judgment,

MEMORANDUM ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge. Plaintiffs Carole MacDonald, Marilyn Salisbury, John Golisz, Richard Takac, Juanita Cluffer-Washington, and Hexin McPhee bring this action against Defendant Unisys Corporation (“Unisys”) for violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. Plaintiffs bring this action individually and as a collective action

Judge Walker concurring. I am unable to conclude that the applicant Parrott has complied with Section 155-31(C) (2) of the Ordinance; i.e., no site plan is included in the record. However, I do not construe the Ordinance to require the applicant to submit detailed architectural and engineering drawings. Instead, the plans and required conditions must be sufficiently complete to allow for thorough review and

KANNE, Circuit Judge. What began as a normal day for nineteen-year-old Richard Pack ended with his death shortly after an altercation outside his apartment with Chicago Police Officers M.L. Moore and Garland D. Price. Pack’s mother, Ina Carter, individually and as administratrix of his estate, filed suit against Moore, Price, and the City of Chicago alleging that the officers used excessive force during their encounter wit

165 F.3d 1071 Ina CARTER, individually and as administratrix of the Estateof Richard Pack, deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.CHICAGO POLICE OFFICERS M.L. Moore and G. Price and the Cityof Chicago, Defendants-Appellees. No. 96-3209. United States Court of Appeals,Seventh Circuit. Argued Sept. 18, 1998.Decided Dec. 31, 1998.

348 S.C. 340 (2001) 559 S.E.2d 327 Wannelle HEDGEPATH, Andrew Hedgepath, and Kristin Hedgepath, Appellants/Respondents, v. AMERICAN TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, a corporation, AT & T Nassau Metals Corporation, Respondents/Appellants, and Gaston Copper Recycling Corporation, and Southwire Company, Respondents. Karen Mack as Personal Representative of the Estate of Toby L. Sharpe, Sr., Appellant/Respondent,

DURHAM, Justice: This is an appeal from a summary judgment in favor of appellees in which the trial court deferred to fence lines as property boundary lines over those established by a record title survey. In granting summary judgment, the trial court relied on the doctrine of boundary by acquiescence. Appellants contend that the trial court misapplied the doctrine and that summary judgment in their favor was warranted. We a

LUMBARD, Circuit Judge: Phillip J. Gentile and Hunter B. Bra-shier appeal from their convictions, after a jury trial in the Southern District, for participation in a conspiracy to sell, pledge, and distribute unauthorized and fraudulently issued securities in violation of 15 U.S.C. §§ 77q(a), 77x and 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341, 2314. Gentil

ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV

ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV

EBEL, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs, a group of former employees of Defendant Lucent Technologies, Inc. (“Defendant”), sued Defendant in state court for fraud arising out of alleged misrepresentations made in encouraging Plaintiffs to take an early retirement benefits package. Defendant removed the case to federal court on the basis of complete preemption under the Employee Retire

OPINION David Puryear, Justice In three separate lawsuits, several hundred individuals sued Asplundh Tree Expert Co. (“Asplundh”) seeking damages stemming from the devastating 2011 Bas-trop County Complex Fire. In response, Asplundh filed a motion for summary judgment asserting that the suits were untimely because they were filed past the two-year statute of limitations. After convening a hearing on the moti