Cases

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Ndow v. State, 864 So.2d 1248 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004). PLEUS, PALMER and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

The Supreme Court of the State of Colorado 2 East 14th Avenue • Denver, Colorado 80203 2023 CO 11 Supreme Court Case No. 21SC885 Certiorari to the Colorado Court of Appeals Court of Appeals Case No. 20CA641 Petitioners: Colorado State Board of Education and Douglas County School District RE-1,

JUSTICE BOATRIGHT delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶1 Gallegos Family Properties, LLC (“Gallegos”), returns to this court for a second time in its effort to de-designate a portion of the Upper Crow Creek Designated Ground Water Basin (“the Basin”) and redraw the Basin boundaries to exclude twenty-five wells so that the State Engineer can curtail the

525 P.3d 290COLORADO STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION and

FIFTH DIVISION MCFADDEN, C. J., MCMILLIAN, P. J., and SENIOR APPELLATE JUDGE PHIPPS NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. http://www.gaappeals.us/rules March 6, 2020

61 So.2d 212 (1952) RAINWATER v. BOATRIGHT et al. No. 7892. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. October 31, 1952. Simon & Carroll, Shreveport, for appellant. J. Bennett Johnston, Shreveport, for appellees. GLADNEY, Judge. Robert W. Rainwater instituted this suit to recover damages for personal injuries to his minor child, Judy Rain

CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS COLORADO SUPREME COURT MONDAY, OCTOBER 16, 2017 "Slip opinions" are the opinions delivered by the Supreme Court Justices and are subject to modification, rehearing, withdrawal, or clerical corrections. Modifications to previously posted opinions will be linked to the case number in the petition for rehearing section the day the changes are announced. Click on the case number to

¶ 1 A party must provide sufficient competent evidence to establish the essential elements of the action or, at the very least, a genuine issue of material facts as to those elements. Here, an inattentive drunk driver struck the plaintiff and several pedestrians in an unmarked crosswalk. The plaintiff’s assertion that had the city of Seattle (City) installed a pedestrian island, she would have stopped and waited for all oncoming traffic to proceed before c

JUSTICE COATS delivered the Opinion of the Court. T1 Marquez sought review of the court of appeals' judgment in People v. Marquez, No. 08CA2326, 2010 WL 5490008 (Colo.App. Dec. 23, 2010) (not published pursuant to C.A.R. 35(f)), which affirmed the district court's imposition of consecutive sentences for two crime-of-violence convictions. Finding that both crimes of violence arose out of the same incident, the distri

21 S.W.3d 184 (2000) Judy K. PERKINS, Respondent, v. Stuardean PERKINS, Appellant. No. 23248. Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division Two. July 7, 2000. *185 Michael Baker, Springfield, for appellant. No appearance for respondent. KERRY L. MONTGOMERY, Presiding Judge. This is an appeal from a d

Opinion issued March 4, 2021 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-20-00674-CV ——————————— IN RE EDUARDO DEL PINO, SPRING DEL PINO, ROBERT RUGGLES, GLORIA RUGGLES, ROBERT DAWKINS, DEMETRIA DAWKINS, EDDIE DELANEY, JENNIFER DELANEY, LEROY DELK, CAROLE DELK, MARTI

*1000ORDER AND JUDGMENT* JEROME A. HOLMES, Circuit Judge. Appellant Redie Bell Lewis, proceeding pro se, appeals the judgment of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (BAP) affirming the bankruptcy court’s dismissal of her adversary proceeding based on claims of negligence and fraud, as well as violations of the Racketeer Influe

OPINION HANSEN, Vice Chief Judge: Appellants seek review of the trial court’s order imposing sanctions for failure to comply with the court’s discovery order. The sanctions included, among other things, dismissal of Appellant Alfred Goldman’s counterclaims. We reverse and remand. *183This action arises from a dispute b

223 F.Supp.2d 1203 (2002) Shirley J. BONES, Plaintiff, v. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., f/k/a Alliedsignal, Inc., Defendant. No. 00-4129-SAC. United States District Court, D. Kansas. September 20, 2002. *1204 *1205 *1206 *1207

863 N.E.2d 386 (2007) Mark J. HAND, Appellant-Defendant, v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee-Plaintiff. No. 14A05-0605-CR-241. Court of Appeals of Indiana. March 28, 2007. *389 Darren Bedwell, Indianapolis, IN, Attorney for Appellant. Steve Carter, Attorney General of Indiana, Jodi Kathryn Stein, Deputy Attorney General Indianap

SETH, Circuit Judge. This is an appeal from the trial court’s order fixing ownership interests in mining claims on federal land. Appellants, defendants below, raise two questions of federal statutory interpretation. They urge that *1179provisions of 43 U.S.C. § 1744 (The 1976 Land Act) operate to void the interests of all appellees. Appellants also contend that man

763 F.2d 1176 Ruth JACKSON (Shelp), Imogene L. McBride, George C. Melineand Ethelmae Meline, husband and wife, Earl B. Milton andVirginia L. Milton, husband and wife, Carroll L. Niblack,Marion Niblack, Bill J. Osborn, Clarence E. Patterson andMary E. Patterson, husband and wife, Clarence E. Pattersonand Helen A. Patterson, Olive Poage, Homer S. Potter andInez M. Potter, husband and wife, Donald J. Reed and IreneS. Reed,

314 N.W.2d 416 (1982) In re the MARRIAGE OF Judith Ann DAY and Charles Lawrence Day. Upon the Petition of Judith Ann Day, Appellant, And Concerning Charles Lawrence Day, Appellee. No. 65803. Supreme Court of Iowa. January 20, 1982. Rehearing Denied February 11, 1982. Harlan M. Hockett and Joseph G. Bertogli of Flagg, Hockett, Benhart & Golden, D

RIVES, Circuit Judge. Two questions are presented by this appeal from a judgment for plaintiffs entered upon a jury verdict: first, whether there was sufficient evidence to support the verdict; and, second, whether the district court erred in charging the jury with respect to the claimed contributory negligence of a 12% year old girl. Since we have concluded with the appellant o

578 F.Supp.2d 888 (2008) AMERISURE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. CAREY TRANSPORTATION, INC., a Florida corporation, and Great West Casualty Co., as subrogee of February Fourteen, Inc., Defendants. Carey Transportation, Inc., Counterclaim-Plaintiff, v. Amerisure Mutual Insurance Company, Counterclaim-Defendant. Carey Transportation, Inc., Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Adriatic Insurance Company, Third-Party Defendant.