Cases

OPINION OF THE COURT JORDAN, Circuit Judge. Until late 2008, Sprint Nextel Corporation (collectively with its operating subsidiaries, including Sprint Spectrum L.P., “Sprint”) included a flat-rate early termination fee (“ETF”) provision in its cellular telephone contracts, which allowed it to charge a set fee to customers who terminated their contracts b

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-18-00357-CR SHERMAN LAMONT DANIELS, APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE On Appeal from the 30th District Court

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-19-00023-CR BRAD SHERMAN BAPTISTE, APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 12

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE DEAN SHERMAN, : : : Plaintiff, : : C.A. No. K18C-06-009 JJC : In and for Kent County v. : : STEPHEN P. ELLIS, ESQUIRE, :

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-14-00819-CV Judy Weirich, Appellant v. IESI Corporation and Southside Wrecker, Inc., Appellees FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BLANCO COUNTY, 33RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. CV07387, HONORABLE J. ALLAN GARRETT, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION

Judgment rendered July 15, 2026. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 56,933-WCA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA ***** JUDY NEGRETE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO . 10-0451 444444444444 NATURAL GAS PIPELINE COMPANY OF AMERICA, PETITIONER, v. WILLIAM JUSTISS, DARLENE JUSTISS, JOSEPH JUSTISS, TOMMY ALSPAUGH, JUDY ALSPAUGH, JOE DENTON MASHBURN, CHRISTINE MASHBURN, JOE DONALD MASHBURN, AND JUDY MASHBUR

KLOPPENBURG, J. ¶ 1. In July 2009, Minnesota's Attorney General filed a complaint against the National Arbitration Forum ("NAF"), a third-party arbitration service, alleging fraud and challenging NAF's suspect ties to the consumer loan and debt collection industries. Shortly after the lawsuit was filed, NAF entered into a consent judgment in which it agreed not to administer, process, or in any manner participate in any new consu

450 B.R. 181 (2011) In re Steven J. STANWYCK, Debtor. Steven J. Stanwyck, Plaintiff, v. Judy L. Bogen, et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 2:07-bk-19183-PC. Adversary No. 2:10-ap-02982-PC. United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California, Los Angeles Division. May 20, 2011. *185 Steven J. Stanwyck, Santa Monica, CA, pro se.

MEMORANDUM OPINION Patrick M. Flatley, United States Bankruptcy Judge On December 8, 2016, Clifford A. Zucker, in his capacity as Liquidating Trustee and Estate Representative (the “Liquidating Trustee”), objected to the amended employment discharge proof of claim filed by Robert Marquardt (“Marquardt”), former President and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) of the Debtor, based upon, among other things, th

202 S.W.3d 638 (2006) ROBERT C. VERSAW AND MYRTLE I. VERSAW, Respondents, v. JUDY EARLINE VERSAW, Respondent, and AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant. No. 27158 Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District. August 3, 2006 Gary R. Cunningham, Tamara F. de Wild, and Paul F. Sherman, Attorney for Appellant. James A. Miller, Attorney for Respo

OPINION Opinion by Chief Justice MORRISS. This five-year-old antitrust action by Josh Bray d/b/a Sanitation Solutions against Waste Management of Texas, Inc., claims antitrust violations 1 by Waste Management in Lamar County and remains in the discovery phase. In late 2009 —

SHERMAN, J. ¶ 1. Heritage Farms, Inc. appeals a judgment and an order of the circuit court denying its request for double damages under Wis. Stat. § 26.21(1) (2007-08),1 and his request for interest on any award of double damages and on the legal fees and costs incurred to obtain such damages. Heritage Farms argues § 26.21 mandates that double damages be awarded in situations where a private owner's p

905 P.2d 355 (1995) 128 Wash.2d 164 Scott SHERMAN, M.D., Ph.D., and Judy Sherman, his wife and their marital community, Respondents, v. The STATE of Washington; University of Washington (School of Medicine); Thomas Hornbein, M.D.; Bruce C. Gilliland, M.D.; and President William Gerberding; John Does 1-3; Jane Does 1-3, Appellants. No. 61645-1. Supreme Court of Washington, En Ban

OPINION AND ORDER RAKOFF, District Judge.1 Jury deliberation is currently underway in the above-captioned case, in which plaintiff Evonne Davis sues defendants Philip Morris USA, Inc. and R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company for injuries that allegedly resulted from defendants’ tortious conduct. The Court presumes familiarity with the expansive record and procedural histor

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING JUDY UNKEPER’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RE: CLAIM OF $50,000 HOMESTEAD EXEMPTION ROGER G. MOOREMAN, Bankruptcy Judge. Sherman Unkefer, III and Judy Unkefer, husband and wife, were named as debtors in an involuntary Chapter 7 petition that was filed on February 7, 1983. These debtors subsequently dissolved their marriage, and now each has claimed a $50,000 homestead

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-24-00257-CR KATHERINE ROSE BRANT, APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE On Appeal from the 69th District Court Sherman County, Texas

ORDER DONALD E. O’BRIEN, Chief Judge. This matter is before the court pursuant to the garnishees’ resisted motion for removal to the United States District Court, and pursuant to the garnishees’ resisted motion to dismiss. The essence of the case before this court is that the Iowa Child Support and Recovery Unit in Spencer, Iowa has sought to garnish checks delivered to workers pursuant to a settlement

Justice KOURLIS delivered the Opinion of the Court. I. Introduction In 1984, the Colorado General Assembly enacted a provision requiring every school district to adopt a discipline code to “deal with disorderly students in a manner which allows other students to learn in an atmosphere which is safe, conducive to the learning process, and free from unnecessary inter

Interim Decision #3401 In re R-S-J-, Respondent Decided June 10, 1999 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals For purposes of section 101(f)(6) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1101(f)(6) (1994), false oral s