⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Julia E. Henderson”

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005-06-22 · Published · cited 0× · 135 F. App'x 934
MEMORANDUM ** Glenn Henderson appeals pro se the district court’s order dismissing his action alleging that defendant committed malpractice and engaged in discrimination when examining Henderson in connection with his workers’ compensation action against his former employer. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Sommatino v. United States, 255 F.3d 704, 707 (9th Cir
Alaska Supreme Court · 2025-02-14 · Published · cited 0× · 563 P.3d 1155
Notice: This opinion is subject to correction before publication in the PACIFIC REPORTER. Readers are requested to bring errors to the attention of the Clerk of the Appellate Courts, 303 K Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99501, phone (907) 264-0608, fax (907) 264-0878, email corrections@akcourts.gov. THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA PETER CHAPMAN, ) ) Supreme Court N
Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024-10-28 · Published · cited 0×
STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A24-0198 State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Julia Gabrielle Monyak, Appellant. Filed October 28, 2024
State v. Hendersonpublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023-12-15 · Published · cited 6× · 2023 Ohio 4576
[Cite as State v. Henderson, 2023-Ohio-4576.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY State of Ohio Court of Appeals No. L-23-1098 Appellee Trial Court No. CR0202201999 v. Mark Henderson DECISION AND JUDGMENT Appellant
Flores v. Hendersonpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024-05-14 · Published · cited 24× · 101 F.4th 1185
Appellate Case: 23-1049 Document: 010111049241 Date Filed: 05/14/2024 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS May 14, 2024
People v. Hendersonpublic domain
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2019-06-28 · Published · cited 1× · 2019 IL App (4th) 170305
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and
State v. Hendersonpublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2015-10-23 · Published · cited 2× · 2015 Ohio 4408
[Cite as State v. Henderson, 2015-Ohio-4408.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY State of Ohio Court of Appeals No. L-14-1272 Appellee Trial Court No. CR0201402338 v. Samuel R. Henderson DECISION AND JUDGMENT Appellant
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2021-02-08 · Published · cited 0×
Affirm; Opinion Filed February 8, 2021 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-00372-CR CARROLL GENE HENDERSON, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 59th Judicial District Court
Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso) · 1992-09-16 · Published · cited 22× · 837 S.W.2d 778; 1992 WL 201247
837 S.W.2d 778 (1992) Sam F. HENDERSON, LTM Enterprises, Inc. and Waterland Enterprises, Inc., Appellants, v. TEXAS COMMERCE BANK-MIDLAND, N.A., f/k/a United Bank Midland, N.A., Appellee. No. 08-91-00232-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, El Paso. August 19, 1992. Rehearing Overruled September 16, 1992. *779 John E.
Ohio Supreme Court · 2024-01-31 · Published · cited 0× · 237 N.E.3d 119; 2024 Ohio 333; 174 Ohio St. 3d 409
[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 174 Ohio St.3d 409.] THE STATE EX REL . HENDERSON v. CLERMONT COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS. [Cite as State ex rel. Henderson v. Clermont Cty. Bd. of Elections, 2024-Ohio-333.] Mandamus—Relator failed to comply with personal-knowledge requirement of S.Ct.Prac.R. 12.02(B)(2) in affidavit filed with petition—Cause dismissed. (No. 2024-00
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020-07-31 · Published · cited 25× · 967 F.3d 1250
Case: 18-10991 Date Filed: 07/31/2020 Page: 1 of 25 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 18-10991 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 9:15-cr-80049-KAM-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Henderson v. Thomaspublic domain
District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2012-08-30 · Published · cited 0× · 289 F.R.D. 506; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123722; 2012 WL 3777146
OPINION AND ORDER MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge. The plaintiffs are eight HIV+ inmates who challenge the policy of the Alabama Department of Corrections of segregating HIV + inmates from the general prison population. The plaintiffs claim that the defendants (the ADOC Commissioner and four wardens) have discriminated against them on the basis of a disability (HIV-1- status) in violation of Title
Henderson v. Thomaspublic domain
District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2012-09-05 · Published · cited 2× · 891 F. Supp. 2d 1296; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 126001; 2012 WL 3846439
OPINION AND ORDER MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge. The eight named plaintiffs (Louis Henderson, Dana Harley, Darrell Robinson, Dwight Smith, Albert Knox, James Douglas, Alqadeer Hamlet, and Jeffery Beyer) bring this lawsuit on behalf of themselves and a class of all current and future HIV + prisoners incarcerated in Alabama Department of Corrections (ADOC) facilities. They challenge ADOC’s
Supreme Court of Iowa · 2018-03-09 · Published · cited 4× · 908 N.W.2d 868
MANSFIELD, Justice. *870 Can a getaway driver be convicted of first-degree robbery under the dangerous weapon alternative without knowing or intending that the robbery does involve a dangerous weapon? In our view, the answer to this question is no. Here the defendant agr
Henderson v. Thomaspublic domain
District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2012-12-21 · Published · cited 3× · 913 F. Supp. 2d 1267; 2012 WL 6681773; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 180690
OPINION MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge. The seven plaintiffs (Louis Henderson, Dana Harley, Dwight Smith, Albert Knox, James Douglas, Alqadeer Hamlet, and Jeffery Beyer) bring this lawsuit on behalf of themselves and a class of all current and future HIV-positive prisoners incarcerated in Alabama Department of Corrections (ADOC) facilities. They challenge the ADOC’s policy of categorically s
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2012-12-14 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs November 14, 2012 RALPH WADKINS & WIFE, JULIA WADKINS v. TANYA WADKINS Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court for Montgomery County No. MCCHCVDR111 Laurence M. McMillan, Jr., Chancellor No. M2012-00592-COA-R3-CV - Filed December 14, 2012 This is a grandparent visitation case,
North Carolina Industrial Commission · 2009-10-29 · Published · cited 0×
*********** The undersigned have reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Harris and the briefs and arguments of the parties. The appealing party has shown good grounds to reconsider the evidence. The Full Commission reverses the Opinion and Award of Deputy Commissioner Harris and enters the following Opinion and Award. ***********
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2014-02-11 · Published · cited 0×
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 11, 2014. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-12-01114-CV JULIA ALMANZA, Appellant V. JOHNNY SALAS, RICARDO HINOJOSA AND ISABELLE M. HINOJOSA, Appellees On Appeal from the 80th District Court Harris County, Texas
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011-04-05 · Published · cited 1× · 708 S.E.2d 315; 210 N.C. App. 716; 2011 N.C. App. LEXIS 640
708 S.E.2d 315 (2011) Lazona Gale SPEARS, Employee, Plaintiff, v. BETSY JOHNSON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, Employer, N.C. Guaranty Association, Successor to Reliance Insurance Company, Carrier, Defendants. No. COA10-580. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. April 5, 2011. *317 Lazona Gale Spears, Coats, pro se, plaintiff-appellant.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016-07-12 · Published · cited 23× · 424 U.S. App. D.C. 101; 828 F.3d 923; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 12759; 62 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 228; 129 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 584; 2016 WL 3726039
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued December 8, 2015 Decided July 12, 2016 No. 14-7190 SANDRA MARSHALL, APPELLANT v. HONEYWELL TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS INC, ET AL., APPELLEES Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 1:05-cv-0250