Cases

WORTHINGTON, J., Plaintiff, Nellie L. Stauffer (Wife), and defendant, Leonard J. Stauffer (Husband), were married on May 21,1982. Master’s report at 2. On July 24, 2001, Wife filed a complaint seeking a divorce pursuant to sections 3301(c), 3301(d), and 3301 (a)(6) of the Pennsylvania Divorce Code, equitable distribution, alimony, alimony pendente lite, counsel fees, costs and expenses. The parties filed affidavits of c

Opinion filed August 7, 2025 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-25-00174-CV __________ WILLIAM LEE JACKSON, JR., Appellant V. CLAYTON BRYAN STAUFFER AND BLACK LABEL SERVICES, INCORPORATED, Appellees On Appeal from the 161st Distr

Nebraska Advance Sheets STAUFFER v. BENSON 683 Cite as 288 Neb. 683 affirmatively showed that Hessler had met the legal standard of competency.40 [16] As to his claims of errors or misconduct at trial and ineffective assistance of counsel, such claims were inappropri- ate for coram nobis relief. The writ of error coram nobis is not available to correct errors of law.41 We find no error in the district cou

165 P.3d 713 (2006) Dr. Christine F. STAUFFER; A Woman's Place Healing Center, P.L.L.P.; A Woman's Center, P.C.; and John Stauffer, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Cara J. STEGEMANN, Peter Dusbabek, and Pamela Roys, Defendants-Appellees. No. 05CA0965. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. III. August 24, 2006. As Modified on Denial of Rehearing November 2, 2006. <

DECISION AND ENTRY AFFIRMING DECISION OF UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT; MATTER REMANDED TO SAID COURT FOR PURPOSE OF CALCULATING THE INTEREST UPON THE PREVIOUSLY ALLOWED AMOUNT OF IRS CLAIM; TERMINATION ENTRY RICE, Chief Judge. This case arises from circumstances surrounding appellant-debtor Robert Stauffer’s (“Stauffer” or “debtor”) misstatements and half-truths on his federal tax returns. On August 2,

141 B.R. 612 (1992) In re Shirley Ann STAUFFER. Bankruptcy No. 92-60322. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio. May 26, 1992. Jonathon L. McGee, Day, Ketterer, Raley, Wright & Rybolt, Canton, Ohio, for General Motors Acceptance Corp. Donald R. Little, Canton, Ohio, for debtor. MEMORANDUM OF DECISION JAMES H. WILLIAMS, Chief Judge.

956 P.2d 967 (1998) 327 Or. 44 In re Complaint as to the CONDUCT OF David W. STAUFFER, Accused. OSB 93-63; SC S43698. Supreme Court of Oregon. Argued and Submitted April 30, 1997. Decided April 9, 1998. Reconsideration Denied May 19, 1998. *969 David W. Stauffer, Portland, argued

OPINION OF THE COURT A. LEON HIGGINBOTHAM, Jr., Chief Judge. This is an appeal by plaintiff, International Raw Materials, Ltd. (“IRM”), from a summary dismissal of a suit alleging that the defendants, who include the major producers of soda ash in the United States, conspired to fix the rates of domestic termi-nalling services for soda ash in violation of § 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1-7 (1988). T

829 F.Supp. 742 (1993) Robert STAUFFER, A Minor, by his Natural Guardian, Margo E. DeMARCO v. WILLIAM PENN SCHOOL DISTRICT, David Gobel, Toby Greco, and Robert Wetzel. Civ. A. No. 92-1251. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. May 21, 1993. John C. Fekety, Havertown, PA, for plaintiffs. Michael I. Levin, Cleckner and Fearen, David W. Brown, Cleckne

A divorce petition was filed by Betty J. Stauffer, plaintiff, against her husband, James, defendant, November 6, 1963. On June 9, 1964, a separation agreement was entered into by these parties. On July 16, 1964, a divorce was granted plaintiff. As part of the divorce decree the custody of Rodney Lee Stauffer, aged 17 years, and Debbie Ann Stauffer, aged 14 *Page 340 years, was confided to plaintiff. The terms of the separation agreement and property settl

767 F.Supp. 687 (1991) INTERNATIONAL RAW MATERIALS, INC. v. STAUFFER CHEMICAL COMPANY, TG Soda Ash, Inc., General Chemical Partners, Tenneco Minerals Company, FMC Wyoming Corp., Kerr-McGee Chemical Corp., American Natural Soda Ash Corp. Civ. A. No. 87-7541. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. June 13, 1991. David Berger (argued), H. Laddie Montague, How

898 F.2d 946 1990-1 Trade Cases 68,963 INTERNATIONAL RAW MATERIALS, LTD., Appellant,v.STAUFFER CHEMICAL COMPANY, TG Soda Ash, Inc., GeneralChemical Partners, Tenneco Minerals Company, FMCWyoming Corp., Kerr-McGee ChemicalCorp., American Natural SodaAsh Corporation. No. 89-1546. United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit.

684 F.2d 1174 17 ERC 1753, 12 Envtl. L. Rep. 20,810 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.STAUFFER CHEMICAL COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 81-5311. United States Court of Appeals,Sixth Circuit. Argued Dec. 17, 1981.Decided July 7, 1982. Charles F. Lettow, Eric C. Je

44 Md. App. 240 (1979) 407 A.2d 1191 STAUFFER CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. ET AL. v. TATE ENGINEERING, INC. ET AL. No. 257, September Term, 1979. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. Decided November 14, 1979. *241 The cause was argued before THOMPSON, MOYLAN and MOORE, JJ. Submitted on brief by Franc

313 S.W.2d 597 (1958) Claire H. STAUFFER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Charles E. STAUFFER, Defendant-Respondent. No. 7687. Springfield Court of Appeals, Missouri. May 9, 1958. *598 Roderic R. Ashby, Charleston, for plaintiff-appellant. T. J. Brown, Jr., Charleston, for defendant-respondent. RUARK, Judge. This is

612 P.2d 463 (1980) AMOCO PRODUCTION COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation, Appellant (Plaintiff), v. STAUFFER CHEMICAL COMPANY OF WYOMING, a Delaware Corporation, Appellee (Defendant). No. 5257. Supreme Court of Wyoming. June 9, 1980. Rehearing Denied July 7, 1980. *464 William T. Schwartz, Cameron S. Walker of Schwar

Atkins, J., This matter is before the court on a motion by defendant for judgment on the pleadings. From the pleadings we ascertain the following facts: On September 29, 1944, Mrs. Anne Elliot executed a document in writing, reading as follows: “This is to certify that I am obligated to pay to Mrs. Monserrat Brown the sum of Six Thousand ($6000.00) Dollars U. S. Currency, which sh

OPINION STEVEN L. HUGHES, Justice Plaintiffs Waterblasting Technologies, Inc. and Thomas G. Wicker, Jr. sued the City of El Paso, the,Mayor,'.and the City Council (collectively, the “City”), seeking a declaration that a bid contract the City awarded was void,, as well as an injunction preventing performance of the contract. The City filed a

198 P.3d 402 (2008) 2008 OK CIV APP 97 Stephen T. LESTER and Dana L. Lester, Co-Trustees of the Lester Family Revocable Trust, Plaintiff/Appellants, v. Daniel A. SMITH and Patricia J. Smith, Husband and Wife, Defendant/Appellees. No. 104,854. Released for Publication by Order of the Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 1. Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division

42 F.3d 787 74 A.F.T.R.2d 94-7399, 94-2 USTC P 50,622,25 UCC Rep.Serv.2d 27 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICEv.Donald GASTER and Mary Ann Gasterv.NINTH WARD SAVINGS BANK, FSB*, Third-partyDefendant,Mary Ann Gaster**, Appellant in Nos.94-7195 and 94-7196.Nos. 94-7195, 94-7196.