⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

8 opinions for “Julius Donald Hodges and Donna Sue Hodges”

State of Texas, Acting by and Through the Texas Facilities Commission, for and on Behalf of the Texas Health and Human Services Commission; The Texas Facilities Commission; Mike Novak, in His Official Capacity as Executive Director of the Texas Facilities Commission; The Texas Health and Human Services Commission; And Rolland Niles in His Official Capacity as Deputy Executive Commissioner for the System Support Services Division of the Texas Health and Human Services Commission v. 8317 Cross Park, LLCpublic domain
Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District · 2025-08-08 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV
read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · find the judge →
State of Texas, the Texas Facilities Commission, the Texas Health and Human Services Commission, Mike Novak, in His Official Capacity as Executive Director of the TFC, and Rolland Niles, in His Official Capacity as Deputy Executive Commissioner for the System Support Services Division of the Texas Health and Human Services Commission v. Broadmoor Austin Associates, a Texas Joint Venturepublic domain
Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District · 2025-08-08 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV
read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · find the judge →
Michael J. DeLitta And DeLCom Properties, LLC v. Nancy Schaeferpublic domain
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-05-06 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-15-00085-CV 5176028 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · find the judge →
United States v. Warnagirispublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2025-01-30 · Published · cited 0×
Appendix A Department of Justice Chart Documenting Sentences in Capitol Breach Cases Monday, January 6, 2025 SENTENCES IMPOSED IN CASES ARISING OUT OF THE EVENTS OF JANUARY 6, 2021 Disclaimer: Those relying on information contained in this document should verify all information for accuracy Table 1: Cases in which the government recommended a probation sentence without home detention 1 0F Defendant Ca
read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · find the judge →
07/01/2002 Case Announcementspublic domain
Ohio Supreme Court · 2002-07-01 · Published · cited 1× · 2002 Ohio 3343
[Cite as 07/01/2002 Case Announcements, 2002-Ohio-3343.] The Supreme Court of Ohio CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS July 1, 2002 DISCIPLINARY CASES 2001-0412. Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Cleary. Patricia A. Cleary is reinstated to the practice of law. MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS 2002-0902. Butcher v. Lewis. Stark App. No. 2001CA00219, 2002-Ohi
read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · find the judge →
In Re Fosamax (Alendronate Sodium) Products Liability Litigationpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017-03-22 · Published · cited 8× · 852 F.3d 268; 2017 WL 1075047; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 5075
OPINION OF THE COURT FUENTES, Circuit Judge. Beginning in 2010, hundreds of plaintiffs filed personal-injury suits against the drug manufacturer Merck Sharp & Dohme, alleging that the osteoporosis drug Fosamax caused them to suffer serious thigh bone fractures. Each Plaintiff brought a state-law tort claim alleging that Merck failed to add an adequate w
read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · find the judge →
Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a.public domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019-05-16 · Published · cited 2× · 2019 NY Slip Op 3883
Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. (2019 NY Slip Op 03883) Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. 2019 NY Slip Op 03883 Decided on May 16, 2019 Appellate Division, Third Department
read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · find the judge →
United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.public domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2006-08-17 · Published · cited 66× · 449 F. Supp. 2d 1; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57759; 2006 WL 2380622
449 F.Supp.2d 1 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, and Tobacco-Free Kids Action Fund, American Cancer Society, American Heart Association, American Lung Association, Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights, and National African American Tobacco Prevention Network, Intervenors, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., (f/k/a Philip Morris, Inc.), et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 99-2496(GK). United States Distri
read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · find the judge →