Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “K.C. v. THE INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF THE MEDICAL LICENSING BOARD OF INDIANA”
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-2366 K.C., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF THE MEDICAL LICENSING BOARD OF INDIANA, et al., Defendants-Appellants. ____________________ Appeal from the United States
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-2366 K.C., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF THE MEDICAL LICENSING BOARD OF INDIANA, et al., Defendants-Appellants. ____________________ Appeal from the United States
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-2366 K.C., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF THE MEDICAL LICENSING BOARD OF INDIANA, et al., Defendants-Appellants. ____________________ Appeal from the United States
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-2366 K.C., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF THE MEDICAL LICENSING BOARD OF INDIANA, et al., Defendants-Appellants. ____________________ Appeal from the United States
SARAH EVANS BARKER, JUDGE *939In recent years, several states have adopted statutes prohibiting an abortion procedure known to medicine as "dilation and evacuation" ("D & E") and referred to by its political opponents as "dismemberment abortion." Among these statutes is Indiana's House Enrolled Act 1211 ("HEA 1211"), enacted on April 24, 2
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 17-3163 PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF INDIANA AND KENTUCKY, INC., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. COMMISSIONER OF THE INDIANA STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, et al., Defendants-Appellants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
in the Interest of K.I.B.C., a Childpublic domain
ACCEPTED 14-15-00882-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 12/28/2015 8:14:08 PM CHRISTOPHER
Timothy C. Platt v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Workforce Development (mem. dec.)public domain
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), FILED this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any May 26 2017, 6:19 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK Indiana Supreme Court the defense of res judicata, collateral Co
Brian Philip Manookian v. Board of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court of Tennesseepublic domain
02/16/2024 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs October 21, 2022 BRIAN PHILIP MANOOKIAN v. BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court for Davidson County No. 20-0833-I William B. Acree, Senior Judg
FILED 15-0092 8/4/2015 3:59:31 PM tex-6352761 SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
Planned Parenthood of Indiana, Inc. v. Commissioner of the Indiana State Department of Healthpublic domain
*897 ENTRY ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION TANYA WALTON PRATT, District Judge. Following a vigorous and often contentious legislative debate, Governor Mitch Daniels signed House Enrolled Act 1210 (“HEA 1210”) into law on May 10, 2011. The new law accomplishes two objectives. First, HEA 1210 prohibits certain entities that perform abort
In the Matter of Antavis Chavispublic domain
In the Matter of Antavis Chavis, Misc. No. 65, September Term, 2022 AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT – UNIFORM BAR EXAMINATION – TEST ACCOMMODATION REQUEST – Supreme Court of Maryland held that bar applicant met burden to prove both that he has “disability” under Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 to 12213, and that test accommodation he requested—i.e., 50% additional time to take Uniform Bar Examination (“UBE”)—was warranted. Supreme Court adopted two-step test
BRADFORD, Judge. Case Summary 2 [1] Beginning in 2012, patients around the country began suffering meningitis after being injected with preservative-free methylprednisolone acetate (“MPA”), a steroid purchased from New England Compounding Pharmacy, Inc., a/k/a the New England Compounding Center (“NECC
Planned Parenthood of the Heartland v. Hilgerspublic domain
Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 08/02/2024 12:05 AM CDT - 217 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 317 Nebraska Reports PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE HEARTLAND V. HILGERS Cite as 317 Neb. 217 Planned Parenthood of the Heartland, Inc.,
Planned Parenthood of the Heartland v. Hilgerspublic domain
Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 07/26/2024 09:06 AM CDT - 217 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 317 Nebraska Reports PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE HEARTLAND V. HILGERS Cite as 317 Neb. 217 Planned Parenthood of the Heartland, Inc.,
ACCEPTED 15-24-00113-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 2/5/2025 2:30 PM No. 15-24-00113-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
FILED Dec 19 2024, 2:05 pm CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals
USCA11 Case: 22-11707 Document: 152-3 Date Filed: 08/28/2024 Page: 1 of 173 In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-11707 ____________________ PAUL A. EKNES-TUCKER, Rev., BRIANNA BOE, individually and on behalf of her
FOR PUBLICATION ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE: PETER J. RUSTHOVEN JAY P. LEFKOWITZ JOHN R. MALEY STEVEN J. MENASHI Barnes & Thornburg, LLP Kirkland & Ellis, LLP Indianapolis, Indiana New York, New York STEVEN D. McCORMICK
Whittney Ford v. the University of Texas at Austinpublic domain
ACCEPTED 15-25-00123-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/25/2025 5:17 PM NO. 15-25-00123-CV CHRISTOPHER A. P