Cases

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 19-2899 ___________________________ In re: Bair Hugger Forced Air Warming Devices Products Liability Litigation ------------------------------ George Amador Plaintiff - Appellant

JACK ZOUHARY, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE INTRODUCTION In April 2019, Defendant Navistar, Inc., removed this case from Ohio state court, following dismissal of the only non-diverse defendant (Doc. 1). Plaintiffs Keller Logistics Group, Inc., Thomas Keller Leasing Company, Inc., and Thomas Keller Trucking, Inc., move to remand (Doc. 4), citing the one-year limit for removal under

NOTICE: SLIP OPINION (not the court’s final written decision) The opinion that begins on the next page is a slip opinion. Slip opinions are the written opinions that are originally filed by the court. A slip opinion is not necessarily the court’s final written decision. Slip opinions can be changed by subsequent court orders. For example, a court may issue an order making substantive changes to a slip opinion or publishing for precedential pur

422 F.Supp. 1005 (1976) Richard F. KELLER, Plaintiff, v. GRAPHIC SYSTEMS OF AKRON, INC., EMPLOYEES PROFITSHARING PLAN, Defendant. Civ. A. No. C 76-72 A. United States District Court, N. D. Ohio, E. D. November 10, 1976. *1006 Charles J. Tyburski, Black, McCuskey, Souers & Arbaugh, Canton, Ohio, for plaintiff. William B

155 T.C. No. 10 UNITED STATES TAX COURT THE COCA-COLA COMPANY & SUBSIDIARIES, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 31183-15. Filed November 18, 2020. P, a U.S. corporation, was the legal owner of the intellectual property (IP) necessary to manufacture, distribute, and sell some of the best-known beverage brands in the world. This IP included trade- marks, product names, lo

ACCEPTED 15-25-00067-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 9/19/2025 11:09 AM No. 15-25-00067-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE _______________________________________

ACCEPTED 13-15-00506-CV THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 5/12/2016 3

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas OPINION No. 04-22-00524-CV ROCKSPRINGS VAL VERDE WIND, LLC, Appellant v. Jackie CASANOVA, RPA, CCA, in her capacity as the Chief Appraiser of the Val Verde

M. Hannah Lauck, United States District Judge This matter comes before the Court on the Joint Motion to Dismiss (the "Motion to Dismiss") filed by Respondents Powhatan Energy Fund, LLC ("Powhatan"), Houlian "Alan" Chen ("Chen"), HEEP Fund, Inc. ("HEEP Fund"), and CU Fund, Inc. ("CU Fund") (collectively, "Respondents"). (ECF No. 95.) Respondents contend that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC" or the "Commission") brough

169 S.W.3d 831 (2005) Cynthia PEDIGO, Appellant, v. Michael BREEN, Appellee. No. 2003-SC-0028-DG. Supreme Court of Kentucky. October 21, 2004. As Modified on Denial of Rehearing February 17, 2005. Michael A. Schafer, Louisville, Counsel for Appellant. Barton D. Darrell, Elizabeth W. Burt, Bell, Orr, Ayers & Moore, P.S.C., Bowling Green, C

*1369Opinion BRUINIERS, J. Donald W. Dye and his wife, Valerie (hereafter the Dyes), allege that Donald suffered from silicosis and other pulmonary diseases as a result of exposure to silica in his use of defendants’ defective products.1 In a prior unpublished opinion on consolidated appeals (Dye v. Caterpilla

REYNA, Circuit Judge. This case returns to us on remand from the Supreme Court of the United States and was returned to the panel for reconsideration in light of Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc., 574 U.S. —, 135 S.Ct. 831, — L.Ed.2d — *1334 (2015). Appellant Univ

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-08-00734-CV Michael Scott Giesler, Appellant v.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-08-00734-CV Michael Scott Giesler, Appellant v. Kelly Ann Giesler, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 126TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-FM-06-004964, HONORABLE SUZANNE COVINGTON, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION

AMENDED MEMORANDUM JONES, II, District Judge. In Civil Action No. 10-4374, Relators Stephen A. Krahling and Joan A. Wlo-chowski (“Plaintiffs”) bring this qui tam action in accordance with the False Claims Act (“FCA”), pursuant to -31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-33. Relators allege that their former employer, Defendant Merck & Co., Inc. (“Merck”) fraudulently misled the government and omitted, c

[Cite as Buffalo Wings & Rings, L.L.C. v. M3 Restaurant Group, L.L.C., 2015-Ohio-3843.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Buffalo Wings & Rings, LLC, : c/o Slovin & Associates Co. LPA, : Plaintiff-Appellant, No. 14AP-980 :

Affirmed and Majority Memorandum Opinion filed October 31, 2024. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-22-00756-CV STANLEY COLE, Appellant V. EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION, Appellee On Appeal from the 333rd District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No.

Ronald B. Leighton, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendants Playtika, Ltd., Playtika Holding Corp., and Ceasars Interactive Entertainment, LLC.'s (collectively "Playtika") Motion to Dismiss and Strike. Dkt. # 40. The underlying dispute is a class action to recover money lost playing electronic gambling games available through different platforms, incl

*807ORDER JOAN N. ERICKSEN, District Judge. Plaintiff Aviva Sports, Inc. (Aviva) brought this action against Defendants Fingerhut Direct Marketing, Inc. (Finger-hut), Menard, Inc. (Menard), Kmart Corporation (Kmart), WalMart Stores, Inc. (Wal-Mart), and Manley Toys, Ltd. (Manley), alleging patent infringement and false advertising in violation of the

BACHARACH, Circuit Judge. Lenox MacLaren Surgical Corporation manufactures bone mills, which are medical devices used in spinal-fusion surgery. In 2000, Lenox began to sell some of its bone mills through a Medtronic entity, Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA. The arrangement ended badly: Medtronic Sofa-mor Danek USA initiated a recall of Le-nox’s bone mills, and another Medtronic ent