Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “KELLY J HILL”
In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District WRIT DIVISION ONE KRISTINE HILL AND DENNIS HILL, ) ED110232 ) Relators, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court of ) St. Louis County v. ) 19SL-CC0
Kelly v. McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER 1 MILTON I. SHADUR, Senior District Judge. This memorandum opinion and order is occasioned by a motion that is highly unusual in nature, perhaps even unique in this Court’s long tenure on the bench: Counsel for plaintiff Shawn Kelly (“Kelly”) has filed a motion asking leave to serve requests to admit, and counsel for defendant M
Kelly v. McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MILTON I. SHADUR, Senior District Judge. Shawn Kelly (“Kelly”) has sued McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. (“McGraw”), to which Kelly served as an independent sales representative. Kelly asserted a host of theories of recovery, most of which were previously dismissed by this Court or withdrawn by Kelly. Still remaining at issue are MeGrav/s alleged breach of Kelly’s most r
Kelly v. McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MILTON I. SHADUR, Senior District Judge. Shawn Kelly (“Kelly”) has sued McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. (“McGraw”), where Kelly worked as an independent sales representative, asserting a host of theories of recovery: breach of, and interference with, the most recent two-year Sales Representative Agreement between them (the “2008 Sales Agreement”) (Count I); failure to p
707 Blue Hills, LLC v. Kellypublic domain
************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin- ion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi- cially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical cor
Punt v. Kelly Servicespublic domain
McKAY, Circuit Judge. This case involves claims brought under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000ff et seq., by a temporary employee whose assignment by a staffing agency to work as the receptionist for another business was terminated after sh
Kelly v. Polk Cnty.public domain
ZACHARY, Judge. Plaintiff Ricky D. Kelly, as Administrator of the Estate of Patrick Craig Kelly, appeals from the trial court's order granting defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiff's wrongful death and negligence actions for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. We affirm. Factual and Procedural Background On 10 February 2017, the Estate of Patrick Craig Kelly
Kelly v. Siumapublic domain
OPINION BY STEVENS, P.J.: This is an appeal from the December 9, 2010 order entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County denying Appellant BBK, Ine.’s, d/b/a the Princeton Tavern (hereinafter BBK, Inc.), petition to open the default judgment entered in favor of Appellees Ronald and Patricia Kelly (hereinafter collectively the Kellys). We affirm. The relevant facts and procedur
STEPHON LOFTON v. KELLY HILLpublic domain
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT STEPHON LOFTON, Appellant, v. KELLY HILL; GLOBAL RENTAL COMPANY, INC.; and AMERICAN LIGHTING SIGNALIZATION, LLC, Appellees. No. 2D23-1780 February 28, 2024 Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130
United States v. Eric Kellypublic domain
FLAUM, Circuit Judge. Based on evidence recovered during.a police search of his apartment, defendant Eric Kelly was charged with possession of crack cocaine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1); possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A); and possession of a firearm by a felon, in viola
Sowell v. Kelly Services, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM . JOYNER, District Judge. Before the Court are Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 29), Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition thereto (Doc. No. .31), and Defendant’s Reply in Further Support thereof (Doc. No. 35). For the reasons given below, the Motion is Granted - in part and Denied in part. An Order follows. , I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Tanika
Kelly v. McNeelpublic domain
250 P.3d 1105 (2011) 2011 WY 79 Eva D. KELLY and Lee J. Kelly, in their individual capacities, Appellants (Plaintiffs), v. Roby L. McNEEL, Successor Trustee, Appellee (Defendant). In the Matter of the Guardianship and Conservatorship of Robert Lee McNeel, Eva D. Kelly, an individual, Appellant (Guardian), v. Roby Lee McNeel, Guardian and Conservator and Trustee of the Robert L. McNeel Living Trust, Appellee (In
Kelly v. Georgia-Pacific, LLCpublic domain
Levine, J. The question presented for our review is whether the Florida Wrongful Death Act supersedes the common law requirement that a spouse must be married to the decedent before the date of the decedent’s injury to recover damages for loss of consortium. Stated another way, did the legislative enactment, giving the estate’s representatives and survivors a remedy not found in the common law, “explicitly,” “clearly,” and “un
People v. Hillpublic domain
761 N.W.2d 101 (2009) PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Nayvon HILL, Defendant-Appellant. Docket No. 137018. COA No. 284188. Supreme Court of Michigan. March 6, 2009. Order On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 9, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), i
City of Richmond Hill v. Maiapublic domain
SEELIGER, Judge, dissenting. Recognizing that it has long been the rule in Georgia that, generally speaking, “ ‘suicide is an unforeseeable intervening cause of death which absolves the tortfeasor of liability,’ ”8 the specific facts here demand a jury should decide whether Sahlberg is absolved. While “ ‘a wrongdoer is not responsible for a consequence which is merely possible, . .
Hill v. OSJ of Bloomfield, LLCpublic domain
*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr
Isotalo v. Kelly Services, Inc.public domain
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [15] NANCY G. EDMUNDS, District Judge. Before the Court is Defendant Kelly Services, Inc.’s motion for partial summary judgment on Plaintiff John Isotalo’s federal and state age discrimination claims.1 (Dkt. 15.) Defendant moves for summary judgment on Plaintiffs claim arguing that Plaintiffs repre
HILL v. JACKSON Et Al.public domain
MERCIER, Judge. This appeal is from the grant of summary judgment to several defendants in a wrongful death suit filed on behalf of plaintiff/appellant Gabrielle Hill (“Appellant”), the minor child of Richard Willie Hill, Jr. (“Hill”), against Fulton County Sheriff Theodore Jackson, Nitosha Riley, Latessa Robertson, Milton Weaver, Charles Martin, Andrea Thomas (collectively, the “
MDQ, LLC v. Gilbert, Kelly, Crowley & Jennett LLPpublic domain
GRIMES, J. *704SUMMARY The question in this interpleader action is which adverse claimant was entitled to the interpleaded funds: a judgment creditor with a properly recorded judgment lien, or an assignee who did not file a financing statement with respect to distributions irrevocably assigned to it by the judg
Kelly v. BOROUGH OF CARLISLEpublic domain
815 F.Supp.2d 810 (2011) Brian D. KELLY, Plaintiff v. The BOROUGH OF CARLISLE and David J. Rogers, individually and as a police officer for the Carlisle Borough Police Department, Defendants. Civil Action No. 1:07-cv-1573. United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. September 7, 2011. *812 Dennis E. Boyle, Joshua M. Autry, B