Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “KENNEDY v. FIKE”
Kennedy v. Statepublic domain
Appellant, Mary Parker Kennedy, was found guilty of the offense of the fraudulent use of a credit card, pursuant to Title 13A-9-14, Code of Alabama 1975. The court, in accordance with the jury's verdict, entered a judgment of guilty and sentenced the appellant under the Alabama Habitual Offender Act to a term of 15 years. There is only one issue on appeal. I Appellant contends that the court erred in sustaining the State's ob
United States v. Fikepublic domain
82 F.3d 1315 44 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 479 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Mary Jane FIKE, Eddie Franklin Douglas, Edd C. Douglas,Altonio O'Shea Douglas, Elbert Douglas, Jr., James WeldonCampbell, Burvon King, Orpheus Hill, Arthur Jackson Douglas,Chauncey Mosley, Cynthia Tamplin, Wesley James Wilson,Defendants-Appellants. No. 93-1797.
Kennedy v. BNSF Railway Corp.public domain
227 P.3d 1120 (2009) 2009 OK CIV APP 98 Phillip KENNEDY, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. BNSF RAILWAY CORPORATION f/k/a Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company, Defendant/Appellee. No. 107,412. Released for Publication by Order of the Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 2. Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 2. October 30, 2009.
Fike v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.public domain
This cause is before this court on appeal on questions of law. Reference will be made to the parties by the titles which they bore in the trial court. For some time prior to January 8, 1935, plaintiff, Benjamin F. Fike, had been continuously employed by the defendant, The Goodyear Tire Rubber Company, and for a very short time before his injury on January 8, 1935, he had occupied the position of lobby attendant in the main lobby of defendant's main office building. His duties as such
Fike v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.public domain
It is ordered and adjudged that said appeal as of right be, and the same is hereby, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause. Appeal dismissed. WEYGANDT, C.J., MATTHIAS, ZIMMERMAN, WILLIAMS and MYERS, JJ., concur. JONES and DAY, JJ., not participating. *Page 372
In re Fike's Estatepublic domain
This is an appeal from a probate proceeding which originated in the county court of Muskogee county. An appeal was prosecuted to the district court from the order of the county court which admitted to probate the will and codicil, and also from the decree and order of approval of administratrix's final account and the determination of heirship and order of distribution. By agreement the two causes were consolidated in the district court. Testatrix, Mrs. Lee Fike, executed and p
Fike v. Peterspublic domain
This is an appeal from a judgment rendered in the district court of Creek county for the wrongful death, and pain and suffering endured by Frankie Peters, who was drowned at Sapulpa, Okla. While swimming with companions in a municipal swimming pool, she was drawn by force of suction into the mouth of a large siphon, installed by defendants for the purpose of lowering the surface of the water impounded by the dam in order to more conveniently construct a railroad trestle one-half mile up strea
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge: In these consolidated cases, defendants Terry Cray Stenberg, Loren Jay Ellison and Earl K. Fike, Jr. appeal their convictions for violations of the Lacey Act, 16 U.S.C. §§ 3372(a), 3373(d) (1985). Ellison and Fike also appeal their convictions for violations of the Eagle Protection Act, 16 U.S.C. § 668 et s
Summers v. Fikespublic domain
KENNEDY, Judge. Plaintiff sought and recovered judgment on an account for keeping and boarding defendant’s mare, Miami Tu, and Miami Tu’s colt, in the sum of (using the termino!-, ogy of the verdict) “$12,000 plus 18 percent.” The suit was based upon the stableman’s lien statute, Section 430.150, RSMo 1986. The trial court calculated the interest to amount to $5,527.23 and entered judgment for plaintiff aga
Hill Manufacturing Co. v. Webbpublic domain
MADDOX, Justice. AFFIRMED. NO OPINION. See Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(F), Ala. R.App.P. ALMON, SHORES, HOUSTON, KENNEDY, COOK, SEE, and LYONS, JJ., concur. HOOPER, C.J., concurs in part and dissents in part.
Susan Davis Van Dyke v. H & S Farms, Inc.public domain
11TH COURT OF APPEALS EASTLAND, TEXAS JUDGMENT Susan Davis Van Dyke et al., * From the 118th District Court of Martin County, Trial Court No. 6848. Vs. No. 11-19-00195-CV * September 14, 2023 H & S Farms, Inc. et al., * Memorandum Opinion
Smith v. Durdenpublic domain
KENNEDY, Judge (dissenting). {21} I do not concur with the majority’s opinion in this case because I conclude that in every case the tort of defamation requires proof of actual injury to the plaintiffs reputation. That the existence of other damages that might accrue as a result of an injury are a different thing than what might establish the injury itself. Damages are not
In re Estate of Pursell v. Pursellpublic domain
[Cite as In re Estate of Pursell v. Pursell, 2023-Ohio-2531.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT ALLEN COUNTY IN RE: THE ESTATE OF: PAUL R. PURSELL, SR., ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES, CASE NO. 1-23-04 -and- CHRISTY T. PURSELL, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. OPINI
Ex Parte Drummond Co., Inc.public domain
After carefully reviewing the petition, the record, and the briefs, we conclude that the writ of certiorari is due to be quashed as having been improvidently granted. In quashing the writ, however, we do not wish to be understood as agreeing with the reasoning of the Court of Civil Appeals concerning the applicability of Ex parte St. Regis Corp., 535 So.2d 160 (Ala. 1988). *Page 1323 WRIT QUASHED
State ex rel. Allison v. Farrispublic domain
MOORE, Chief Justice. The State of Alabama, on behalf of Rick Allison, Probate Judge of Walker County, appeals from a judgment of the Walker Circuit Court in favor of Jill Farris, the county administrator for Walker County. By statute, Judge Allison, as the chief elections officer for Walker County, see § 17 — 1—3(b), Ala. Code 1975, must publish certain voter lists and election notices (the lists and the notices are hereinaft
Strauss v. Hortonpublic domain
46 Cal.4th 364 (2009) ___ Cal.Rptr.3d ___ ___ P.3d ___ KAREN L. STRAUSS et al., Petitioners, v. MARK B. HORTON, as State Registrar of Vital Statistics, etc., et al., Respondents; DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH et al., Interveners. ROBIN TYLER et al., Petitioners, v. THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al., Respondents; DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH et al., Interveners. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO e
Cook v. Wilkiepublic domain
150 N.W.2d 124 (1967) 181 Neb. 596 Dorothy L. COOK and Charles H. Cook, Wife and Husband, Appellees, v. W. Irving WILKIE, Appellant. No. 36347. Supreme Court of Nebraska. April 14, 1967. *125 Kartman & Fike, Omaha, for appellant. Kennedy, Holland, DeLacy & Svoboda, Thomas R. Burke, Omaha, fo
Limacher v. Spiveypublic domain
198 P.3d 370 (2008) 2008-NMCA-163 Walter Patrick LIMACHER, George Luevano, Wilhelmina H. Luevano, and Joe Sanchez, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Jalayne SPIVEY and State of New Mexico, Defendants-Appellees. No. 26,770. Court of Appeals of New Mexico. September 12, 2008. Certiorari Denied, No. 31,353, November 4, 2008. Peter B. Sh
Hutchison v. Kaforeypublic domain
[Cite as Hutchison v. Kaforey, 2016-Ohio-3541.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) MARK A. HUTCHISON, et al. C.A. No. 27761 Appellant v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE ELLEN C. KAFOREY, et
Susan Davis Van Dyke v. the Navigator Grouppublic domain
Opinion filed December 31, 2020 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-18-00050-CV __________ SUSAN DAVIS VAN DYKE ET AL., Appellants V. THE NAVIGATOR GROUP ET AL., Appellees On Appeal from the 118th District Court Martin