Cases

ORDER ORINDA D. EVANS, District Judge. This action to recover on a note is before the Court on Motions to Dismiss and a Motion to Strike Affirmative Defenses. This case involves a dispute among former business partners in various real estate investments. For the following reasons, Bank of the Ozarks’ Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims and Strike Affirmative Defenses [Doc. 38] is GRANTED in part

(2007) UNITED STATES of America, v. Shaheed KHAN, Defendant. No. 06-cr-255 (DLI). United States District Court, E.D. New York. October 30, 2007. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DORA L. IRIZARRY, District Judge. Before the court is a motion by Defendant Shaheed Khan ("Defendant" or "Khan") requesting, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 455(a), to disqualify

67 F.Supp.2d 103 (1999) Eyal KATZMAN, Plaintiff, v. Dr. KHAN, Individually, and in his capacity as an employer/agent of the Queens Hospital Center; Dr. Martin, Individually, and in his capacity as an employer/agent of the Queens Hospital Center; Dr. Locuratolo, Individually, and in his capacity as an employer/agent of the Creedmoor Psychiatric Center; Dr. Sanker, Individually, and in his capacity as an employer/agent of the Creedmoor Psychiatric

145 F.Supp.2d 280 (2001) Mohammad KHAN Plaintiffs, v. Patrick P. RYAN, John Doe, Richard Roe and the City of New York Defendants. No. 99 CV 2142. United States District Court, E.D. New York. April 10, 2001. *281 *282 Alan D. Levine, Kew Gardens, NY, for Mahammad Khan, plaintiff. John P.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FRAZ KHAN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 22-2480 (TJK) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SE- CURITY, et al., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Fraz Khan and his brother Adam Malik were questioned by federal agents while re-entering the United St

755 F.Supp.2d 767 (2010) UVIADO, LLC, by and through Shahid R. KHAN a partner other than the Tax Matters Partner, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, by and through the INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Defendant. Leman, LLC, by and through Jonction LLC a partner other than the Tax Matters Partner, Plaintiff, v. United States of America, by and through the Internal Revenue Service, Defendant. Civil Action Nos. H-09-0

MEMORANDUM AND OPINION LEE H. ROSENTHAL, District Judge. In January 2009, two investment partnerships, Uviado, LLC and Leman, LLC, filed these lawsuits against the United States, seeking readjustment of partnership items proposed in two notices of Final Partnership Administrative Adjustment (“FPAA”) issued in August 2008 by the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service. The issue addressed in this opinio

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for reargument under V.R.A.P. 40 as well as formal revision before publication in the Vermont Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions by email at: JUD.Reporter@vermont.gov or by mail at: Vermont Supreme Court, 109 State Street, Montpelier, Vermont 05609-0801, of any errors in order that corrections may be made before this opinion goes to press. 2020 VT 90

605 So.2d 126 (1992) FIRST CONTINENTAL CORPORATION, Appellant, v. Bashir H. KHAN, Appellee. No. 91-2641. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. August 21, 1992. Rehearing Denied September 28, 1992. *127 Ronald M. Hand of Hoequist and Hand, Kissimmee, and T. Kevin Knight of Drage, Debeaubien, Knight

44 Cal.App.2d 887 (1941) THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. HARRY KNIGHT, Appellant. Crim. No. 3429. California Court of Appeals. Second Dist., Div. Two. May 19, 1941. A. Brigham Rose for Appellant. Earl Warren, Attorney-General, Gilbert F. Nelson, Deputy Attorney-General, John F. Dockweiler, District Attorney, and Geo. H. Johnson, Deputy District Attorney, for

669 F.Supp.2d 637 (2009) Rev. Dr. Thomas A. SUMMERS, Rev. Dr. Robert M. Knight, Rabbi Sanford T. Marcus, Rev. Dr. Neal Jones, Hindu American Foundation, and American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee, Plaintiffs, v. Marcia S. ADAMS, in her individual capacity and in her official capacity as the Director of the South Carolina Department of Motor Vehicles; and Jon Ozmint, in his official capacity as the Director of the Department of Corrections of

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT STEARNS, District Judge. In this antitrust case, plaintiff Evergreen Partnering Group, Inc., seeks to prove that its business failed because of a conspiracy orchestrated by the defendant polystyrene converters and their trade association, the American Chemistry Council. This court granted a motion to dismiss Evergreen’s Complaint on June 7, 201

971 S.W.2d 611 (1998) Joan Lindsey COLEMAN, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Bradley Vale Lindsey, et al., Appellants, v. EQUITABLE REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, INC., et al., Appellees. No. 05-96-00667-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas. March 31, 1998. *613 R. Windle Turley, Tahira Khan Merri

Jones v Workmen's Circle Multicare Ctr. (2025 NY Slip Op 01290) Jones v Workmen's Circle Multicare Ctr. 2025 NY Slip Op 01290 Decided on March 06, 2025 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pu

Mulombo v City of New York (2025 NY Slip Op 03335) Mulombo v City of New York 2025 NY Slip Op 03335 Decided on June 4, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 4

611 F.3d 248 (2010) A.A., by and through his parents and legal guardians, Michelle BETENBAUGH and Kenney Arocha; Michelle Betenbaugh, individually; Kenney Arocha, individually, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. NEEDVILLE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant-Appellant. No. 09-20091. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. July 9, 2010. *

671 F.3d 1052 (2012) Kristin M. PERRY; Sandra B. Stier; Paul T. Katami; Jeffrey J. Zarrillo, Plaintiffs-Appellees, City and County of San Francisco, Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edmund G. BROWN, Jr., in his official capacity as Governor of California; Kamala D. Harris, in her official capacity as Attorney General of California; Mark B. Horton, in his official capacity as Director of the California Department of Public Health & State

DEBRA ANN LIVINGSTON, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs-Appellants (“Plaintiffs”), black-car drivers in the greater New York City area, brought this action in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, asserting claims against Defendants-Appellees (“Defendants”), owners of black-car “base licenses” and affiliat

ORDER Richard Mark Gergel, United States District Court Judge This matter is before the Court on Defendant Nationstar Mortgage, LLC’s, Motion to Seal Document (Dkt. No. 99). For the reasons discussed below, the Court DENIES the motion. Background In March 2007, Plaintiff purchased a residence at 339 Cabell- Street in Charleston, South Carolina. (Dkt. No. 91-3 at 5-6). P

Samer v Desai (2020 NY Slip Op 00318) Samer v Desai 2020 NY Slip Op 00318 Decided on January 15, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 43