Cases

530 F.3d 1239 (2008) Essa KABBA, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, United States Attorney General, Respondent. No. 07-9532. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. July 1, 2008. *1240 Submitted on the briefs:[*] Patrick C. Hyde, Patrick C. Hyde, P.C., Denver, CO, for the Petitioner. Jeffrey S. Buc

Appellate Case: 20-9593 Document: 010110613320 Date Filed: 12/02/2021 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit PUBLISH December 2, 2021 UNITED STATES COURT O

ROGERS, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. I join parts I, II.A, and II.B of the court's opinion, but I respectfully dissent with respect to Parts II.C and II.D. We have no business exercising jurisdiction to review the discretionary aspect of *727the BIA's denial of the

OPINION PER CURIAM: Mie Jing Oei petitions for review of the decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying her asylum and related relief and ordering her removed to Indonesia.1 For the reasons that follow, we will grant the petition and remand for further proceedings. Oei is an ethnic Chinese citizen of Indonesia. She came to the United States in 19

JON 0. NEWMAN, Circuit Judge. This petition to review a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) requires consideration of the standard of review for a court of appeals considering the BIA’s determination that an Immigration Judge’s (“U”) findings of fact are clearly erroneous. This issue arises on a petition by Wu Lin for review of the BIA’s decision of April 30, 2012, denying his application for asylum. We conclu

McHUGH, Circuit Judge; Petitioner Kyaw’Myat Htun is a citizen of Burma who has lived in the United States ftír several years and seeks asylum and other forms of relief that would allow him to remain in the country. The immigration judge (IJ) initially granted Mr. Htun’s asylum application but later reopened the removal proceedings and denied the application. Based on newly dis

12-2163 Lin v. Lynch BIA Brennan, IJ A 088 517 180 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2015 Heard: August 25, 2015

FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit November 25, 2016 PUBLISH Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court UNITED

OPINION OF THE COURT CHAGARES, Circuit Judge. Mei Qin Xie (“Xie”) petitions for review of an order denying her asylum, arguing that the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) improperly applied the clearly erroneous standard of review to the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ’s”) factual findings and that the BIA abused its discretion in denying her asylum. We will grant her petition for review and remand, e solely for t

OPINION OF THE COURT CHAGARES, Circuit Judge. Mei Qin Xie (“Xie”) petitions for review of an order denying her asylum, arguing that the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) improperly applied the clearly erroneous standard of review to the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ’s”) factual findings and that the BIA abused its discretion in denying her asylum. We will grant her petition for review and remand, e solely for t

HAMILTON, Circuit Judge. Petitioner Rufino Antonio Estrada-Martinez faces removal to Honduras, a country that he fled in 1994 after police there detained and tortured him. An immigration judge granted Estrada relief from removal, finding that he will more likely than not face torture if he is removed to Honduras. The Board of Immigration Appeals disagreed regarding the likelihoo

OPINION OF THE COURT KRAUSE, Circuit Judge. This disconcerting case, before our Court for the second time, has a lengthy procedural history marked by conflict between the Board of Immigrations Appeals (BIA) and the Immigration Judge (IJ) and fueled by troubling allegations that Petitioner, an Uzbek national, relished wa

HAYNES, Circuit Judge: Esperanza Alvarado de Rodriguez (“Alvarado”) appeals the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision, which over-: turned an Immigration Judge’s order granting her a good-faith hardship waiver of the joint filing requirement of section 216(c)(4)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”). Such a hardship waiver was required to remove the conditional nature of Alvarado’s status, and the BIA’s

Appellate Case: 23-9567 Document: 70-1 Date Filed: 10/15/2025 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit PUBLISH October 15, 2025

577 F.3d 1122 (2009) Marcelo HALMENSCHLAGER, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr.,[*] United States Attorney General, Respondent. No. 08-9514. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. July 31, 2009. *1124 Judith A. Marty, Fullerton, CA, for Petitioner. Lindsay Brooke Glauner, Karen Y. Stewart, United States

OPINION PAEZ, Circuit Judge: The Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA or Board) governing regulations limit its scope of review of an immigration judge’s (IJ) factual findings. Under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(d)(3)(i), (iv), the BIA may only review findings of fact for clear error, and is prohibited from making its own factual determinations. In this petition f

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ____________ No. 24-1849 ____________ MOHAMMAD M. QATANANI, Petitioner v. ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ____________ ON PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AN ORDER OF THE BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS (A

632 F.3d 117 (2011) Orlando CRESPIN-VALLADARES; Sandra Yanira Melgar-Melgar; S.E.C.M.; S.O.C.M., Petitioners, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent. No. 09-1423. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Argued: December 8, 2010. Decided: February 16, 2011. *119 ARGUED: Jennifer Loraine Swize

HARTZ, Circuit Judge. Timothy Therrien was stabbed when he tried to help apprehend a shoplifter at a Target store. He sued Target Corporation for negligently causing his injuries. After trial in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma, the jury awarded Mr. Therrien $500,000 in damages. Target appeals, contending that (1)

FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit August 9, 2010 PUBLISH Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court UNIT