Cases

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER E. RICHARD WEBBER, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE. This matter comes before the Court on Defendant TG Investments, Inc,’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Count V of the Amended Complaint [ECF No. 38] and Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment on Defendant TG Investments, Inc.’s Counterclaim [ECF No. 44]. I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND This lawsuit origin

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER E. RICHARD WEBBER, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter comes before the Court after a non-jury trial to address the claims asserted by Plaintiffs Jerry Stockdall and Christina Stockdall in their Amended Complaint [ECF No. 13]. A one-day bench trial on these matters was held before this Court on January 11, 2016. The Court makes the following findings of fact and conclusions '

GARY W. LYNCH, P.J. Credit Investments, Inc. (“CII”), as an alleged contract assignee, filed a petition for breach of contract against Clinton W. Dieter under the provisions of chapter 517.1 On March 18, 2016, Dieter was personally served a summons with a copy of Oil’s petition attached and showing a return date and time of April 27, 2016, at 9:00 a.m.2 On that return

Bruns, J.: This is the third appeal in a dispute over access to real property. The Wichita Terminal Association, Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Company, and Union Pacific Railroad (collectively WTA) own and operate railroad tracks in Wichita. F.Y.G. Investments, Inc., andTreatco, Inc. (collectively FYG) own real property adjacent to the WTA’s tracks. In 2008, the WTA was ordered to provide access—by way of a

SCIRICA, Circuit Judge, concurring. I fully concur in the Court’s opinion. I write separately to address this case in the wider context of the evolving law on settlement classes. Ever since the Supreme Court’s landmark decisions in Amchem Products Inc. v. Windsor, 521 U.S. 591, 117 S.Ct. 2231, 138 L.Ed.2d 689 (1997) and Ortiz v. Fibreboard Corp., 527 U.S. 815, 119 S.C

OPINION OF THE COURT JORDAN, Circuit Judge. For more than one hundred years, De Beers S.A. and other entities within the De Beers family of companies (hereinafter collectively “De Beers”) have fixed prices in the wholesale market for gem-quality diamonds through a web of pricing and output-purchase agreements with competitors. In the late 1990s, however, De Beers’s market power began to wane as new supplier

385 B.R. 670 (2008) In re VANTAGE INVESTMENTS, INC. Debtor. Vantage Investments, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Loc Nguyen Corp. and WWW Asset Two Corp., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 04-046536-11-DRD. Adversary No. 07-04076-DRD. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri. March 14, 2008. *677 Carol M. Katzer, Robert D. Gaines, Erlene W

258 S.W.3d 839 (2008) S.D. INVESTMENTS, INC., Respondent, v. Verlin BOES d/b/a Motor Bank, Verlin J. Boes & Associates, Inc., and Motor Banc, L.L.C., Appellants. No. WD 68338. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. May 20, 2008. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 1, 2008. Application for Transfer Denied

McAnany, J.; In this appeal we are asked to apply a requirement in a “Protective Safeguards” endorsement to a fire insurance policy that “All Electric is on Functioning and Operational Circuit Breakers.” Mount Vernon Fire Insurance Company (Mount Vernon) issued the policy that contained this endorsement to Gold Mine Investments, Inc., doing business as Gold Realty (Gold) for fire coverage on a commercial bui

The opinion of the court was delivered by Larson, J.: This case involves a unique set of facts wherein Mohammed Aghakani, the present owner of the underlying property, *126appeals the trial court’s determination that SAD, L.C., the owner of a retained right-of-way for utility purposes, is entitled to the entire proceeds of a condemnation award for the

328 B.R. 137 (2005) In re VANTAGE INVESTMENTS, INC., Debtor. No. 04-046536-11-DRD. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri. August 5, 2005. *138 *139 Erlene W. Krigel, Krigel and Krigel, P.C., Kansas City, MO, for Debtor. MEMORANDUM OPINION DENNIS R. DOW, Bankruptc

246 P.3d 696 (2011) WICHITA TERMINAL ASS'N v. F.Y.G. INVESTMENTS, INC. No. 103015. Court of Appeals of Kansas. February 11, 2011. Decision Without Published Opinion Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with directions.

Green, J.: Premier Realty, LLC, d/b/a ReMax Premier (Premier), and Thomas C. Lassley (collectively referred to as Plaintiffs), real estate broker and a real estate agent, respectively, appeal from a summary judgment entered in favor of I.T.J. Investments, Inc. (ITJ), which denied them commissions under an exclusive right to sell agreement with ITJ. On appeal, the Plaintiffs contend that they alleged facts sufficient to permit a r

188 S.W.3d 1 (2006) STATE of Missouri ex rel., David L. BROWN, Appellant, v. III INVESTMENTS, INC., A Missouri Corporation, Respondent. No. WD 65043. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. January 3, 2006. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer Denied February 28, 2006. Application for Transfer Denied April 11, 2006. As Mod

JAME EDWARD WELSH, Chief Judge. Curry Investment Company, MLB Holdings, LLC, and Outdoor, Inc., (Curry1 ) appeal the Board of Zoning Adjustment’s (BZA) decision that conditioned approval of a special use permit on the removal of two nonconforming outdoor advertising signs.2 Curry asserts two points on appeal. First, Curry contends that the BZA erred when it conditione

265 Kan. 431 (1998) 961 P.2d 32 ARTHUR J. GEORGE and JANET GEORGE, Appellees/Cross-appellants, v. CAPITAL SOUTH MORTGAGE INVESTMENTS, INC., et al., Appellants/Cross-appellees. No. 78,313. Supreme Court of Kansas. Opinion filed June 19, 1998. *432 Jeffrey M. Friedman, of Friedman & Weddington, At

157 S.W.3d 782 (2005) SD INVESTMENTS, INC., Respondent, v. MICHAEL-PAUL, L.L.C., Appellant. No. WD 63228. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. March 22, 2005. *783 William M. Quitmeier, Kansas City, Mo, for appellant. Patrick J. Doran, Kansas City, Mo, for respondent. Before ROBERT G. ULRICH, Presiding Judge

205 P.3d 1245 (2009) UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 232, JOHNSON COUNTY, State of Kansas, Appellee, v. CWD INVESTMENTS, LLC., and Duggan Homes, Inc., Appellants. No. 97,581. Supreme Court of Kansas. April 17, 2009. *1247 Lynn Hursh, of Armstrong Teasdale, LLP, argued the cause, Daren K. Sharp, of the same firm, and Deron A. Anliker,

80 S.W.3d 855 (2002) STATE of Missouri, ex rel., David L. BROWN, Appellant-Respondent, v. III INVESTMENTS, INC, Respondent-Appellant. Nos. WD 59215, WD 59231. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. July 30, 2002. *857 Arthur A. Benson, II, Kansas City, MO, for appellant. Michael W. Lerner, Overland Park, KS, for resp

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 24-1605 ___________________________ Conmac Investments, Inc. Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue