Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Kara B. Andersen”
Andersen,. v. Two Dot Ranch, Inc.public domain
[¶ 1] Three vehicles collided with a cow on a state highway in an area posted as open range resulting in two fatalities. The plaintiffs,1 representing the deceased and surviving passengers of the third vehicle, sued Two Dot Ranch, Inc. (Two Dot), the owner of the cow, and Maria Lopez Hernandez, the driver of the second vehicle. The district court granted summary judgment for all defendants. We affirm the summary judgment on the claims
Ferring B.V. v. Serenity Pharm., LLCpublic domain
ROBERT W. SWEET, U.S.D.J. Plaintiffs Ferring B.V., Ferring International Center S.A., and Ferring Pharmaceuticals Inc. ("Ferring," or the "Plaintiffs") and Defendants Serenity Pharmaceuticals, LLC ("Serenity"), Reprise Biopharmaceutics LLC ("Reprise"), Avadel Specialty Pharmaceuticals LLC ("Avadel") (together, "Defendants," or "Counterclaim Plaintiffs") move for claim construction with respect to two of Defendants' patents, U.S. Pat
Abbott Laboratories v. Sandoz, Inc.public domain
486 F.Supp.2d 767 (2007) ABBOTT LABORATORIES and Astellas Pharma, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. SANDOZ, INC., Sandoz GmbH, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd., Ranbaxy, Inc., Ranbaxy Laboratories, Ltd., Par Pharmaceutical Companies, Inc., and Par Pharmaceutical, Defendants. No. 07 C 1721. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. May
Collaboration Properties, Inc. v. Polycom, Inc.public domain
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF NONPRIVILEGED DOCUMENTS AND FURTHER RESPONSES TO INTERROGATORIES (Docket No. 320) CHEN, United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff Collaboration Properties, Inc. (“CPI”) has filed suit against Defendant Polycom, Inc., claiming that certain Polycom products infringe various CPI patents. Currently pending before the Court i
OPINION AND ORDER KENNETH M. KARAS, District Judge. Plaintiff Financial Freedom Senior Funding Corporation (“Plaintiff’) has filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on Counts IV and V of its Complaint only against individual defendant Robert Fonte (“Defendant”). Count IV alleges that Defendant committed attorney malpractice and breached his fiduciary duty to Plaintiff, while Count V alleges that De
Singer v. Xipto Inc.public domain
OPINION & ORDER KENNETH M. KARAS, District Judge: Plaintiffs Jeffrey and Andrew Singer (“Plaintiffs”) claim that they invested in *418Defendant Xipto Inc. (Defendant) pursuant to a contract, and that their monies have not been returned, in breach of that contract, or, in the alternative, as an act of unjust enrichment by Defendant. Defen
Beale v. Mount Vernon Police Departmentpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER KENNETH M. KARAS, District Judge. Vivian Beale (“Plaintiff”) brings this action against the Mount Vernon Police Department alleging sexual harassment under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and 42 U.S.C. § 1983.1 In addition, Plaintiff brings a state law claim for a hostile work environment
Universal Property & Casualty Insurance Corporation v. Irma Qureshi and George Guerreropublic domain
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT UNIVERSAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. IRMA QURESHI and GEORGE GUERRERO, Appellees. No. 4D2023–1338 [July 24, 2024] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Da
Barberan v. Nationpointpublic domain
706 F.Supp.2d 408 (2010) Jimmy BARBERAN and Tatsiana Barberan, Plaintiffs, v. NATIONPOINT, A Division of National City Bank, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., Atima, Home Loan Services, Inc. d.b.a. Nationpoint Loan Services, LaSalle Bank National Association as Trustee for First Franklin Loan Trust 2006-FF 18, Mortgage Loan Asset-Backed Certificates, *409 Series 2006-FF18, First Franklin Mortgage
United States v. Scottpublic domain
18-2836(L) United States v. Scott UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT _______________ August Term 2019 (Argued: November 22, 2019 Decided: November 5, 2020) Docket Nos. 18-2836, 18-2882 _______________ UNITED ST
Jeanette Carpenter v. Kenneth Thompson Builder, Inc.public domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2011-CT-01028-SCT JEANETTE CARPENTER v. KENNETH THOMPSON BUILDER, INC., COASTAL MASONRY, PRO MOW LAWN CARE, INC. AND CAPITAL SECURITY SERVICES, INC. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/27/2011 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. ROBERT P. KREBS COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: JACKSON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: A. NORRIS HOPKINS, JR. ATTORNEYS FOR APPELL
Abercrombie v. Andrew Collegepublic domain
438 F.Supp.2d 243 (2006) Nancy ABERCROMBIE, as Administratrix of goods, chattels, and credits of Liddie Mae Murphy, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW COLLEGE, Defendant. No. 04-CV-7717(KMK). United States District Court, S.D. New York. June 15, 2006. *244 *245 Matthew Dollinger, Dollinger, Gonski & Gro
Ajida Technologies, Inc. v. Roos Instruments, Inc.public domain
Opinion WUNDERLICH, J. This is an appeal from a judgment confirming an arbitration award. The appeal rests on a claim that the arbitrators exceeded their authority. At issue are two provisions of the award, both drawn from the parties’ terminated agreement and both governing future controversies. The challenged provisions compel further arbitration and permit an award of attorneys’ fees in the event of future
75 Cal.Rptr.3d 333 (2008) 43 Cal.4th 375 181 P.3d 142 CITY OF HOPE NATIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. GENENTECH, INC., Defendant and Appellant. No. S129463. Supreme Court of California. April 24, 2008. *336 Howard, Rice, Nemerovski, Canady, Falk & Rabkin, Jero
Villalpando v. Denver Health & Hospital Authoritypublic domain
181 P.3d 357 (2007) Esperanza VILLALPANDO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DENVER HEALTH AND HOSPITAL AUTHORITY; Simon Shakar, M.D.; Paul Suri, M.D.; Kathy Thigpen, M.D.; and Eugenia Carroll, M.D., Defendants-Appellees. No. 05CA2752. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. VI. November 15, 2007. Certiorari Denied April 7, 2008. *360
Rosemann v. Sigillitopublic domain
ORDER LINDA R. READE, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION.......................................................766 II. RELEVANT PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND..............................766 III. RELEVANT FACTUAL BACKGROUND ..................................766 A. Parties .
Pisani v. Westchester County Health Care Corp.public domain
424 F.Supp.2d 710 (2006) Joseph A. PISANI, Plaintiff, v. WESTCHESTER COUNTY HEALTH CARE CORPORATION, Richard Berman, individually, and Kara Bennorth individually, Defendants. No. 05 CIV. 7113(WCC). United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 31, 2006. *711 *712 Lovett & Gould, White
Ira Iglesia De La Biblia Abierta v. City of Chicagopublic domain
949 F.Supp. 637 (1996) Ira Iglesia de la Biblia ABIERTA, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, et al., Defendants. No. 96 C 3487. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. December 6, 1996. *638 *639 John W. Mauck, Paul B. O'Flaherty, Jr., Mauck, Bellande, Baker & O'Connell,
HP Enterprise Services, LLC v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER BUSH, Judge. HP Enterprise Services, LLC (HP) filed its post-award bid protest complaint on December 19, 2011. HP challenges the award *232of a contract to L-3 Services, Inc. (L-3). The contract is administered by the United States Air Forces in Europe (Air Force or Agency) and is for “healthcare information management and informa
In Re Critical Path, Inc. Securities Litigationpublic domain
156 F.Supp.2d 1102 (2001) In re CRITICAL PATH, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION. No. C-01-0551 WHO. United States District Court, N.D. California. June 28, 2001. *1103 Francis M. Gregorek, Francis A. Bottini, Jr., Betsy C. Manifold, Wolf, Haldenstein, Adler, Freeman & Herz, LLP, San Diego, CA, Nadeem Faruqi, Shane T. Rowley, Faruqi & F