Cases

11th Court of Appeals Eastland, Texas Memorandum Opinion Rebecca Gruben Appellant Vs. No. 11-05-00066-CV -- Appeal from Ector County Karen Wheat and Wayne Wheat Appellees Rebecca Gruben has filed in this court an amended motion to dismiss. In her motion, Gruben states that she n

GENOVESE, Judge. | ,Defendant, BP America Production Company (BP), appeals the trial court’s grant of a motion to enforce a settlement agreement filed on behalf of Plaintiffs, Karen Wheat, individually and in her capacity as executrix for the Succession of Betty Hebert Geer, the Hebert-Geer Company, LLC, Nancy M. Toerner, Dorothy Hebert Tolbert, and Intervenors, Marck Smythe1 and Glenn W. Alexand

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 24a0202p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ NICHOLAS PAUL SOMBERG, │ Plaintiff-

In re BP America Production Company; — Defendant; Applying For Writ of *1071Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Cameron, 38th Judicial District Court Div. 0, No. 10-18439; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 14-450. Denied.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 18–2173 Filed June 30, 2020 KAREN COHEN, Appellant, vs. DAVID CLARK and 2800-1 LLC, Appellees. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Johnson County, Chad Kepros, Judge. A tenant appeals a district court ruling dismissing her claims against her landlord and a neighboring tenant stemming from the landlord’s waiver of its no-pets provision in the lease to

24 Kan. App.2d 934 (1998) 955 P.2d 1339 In the Matter of the Estate of JOHN EDWARD WHEAT. No. 76,968. Court of Appeals of Kansas. Opinion filed March 13, 1998. Darrell Smith, of Overland Park, for appellant. No appearance by appellees. Before GERNON, P.J., GREEN, J., and TIMOTHY E. BRAZIL, District Judge, assigned. GERNON, J.:

JUSTICE WHEAT delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶1 Carl Kananen (Kananen) appeals from the judgment of the Tenth Judicial District Court, Fergus County, granting a motion to dismiss filed by Karen South, Alta Mae Pallett, and Western Surety (collectively “Defendants”). We affirm in part and reverse in part, and

Opinion by JUDGE FURMAN 11 Karen Hunt (wife) appeals from the district court's order denying her relief from the provision of the parties' memorandum of understanding (MOU) dividing the marital value of a business, Big R Construction Company (Big R), owned and operated by Shane Hunt (husband). Wife contends that husband violated C.R.C.P. 16.2(e) by not disclosing mandatory financial information regarding Big R

JUSTICE RICE delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶1 Russell Rintoul (Russell) appeals from the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order entered by the Thirteenth Judicial District Court, Yellowstone County, dividing marital assets in his dissolution. The bulk of the parties’ property was found to be eithe

322 F.Supp.2d 224 (2004) KAREN MARITIME LIMITED, Petitioner, v. OMAR INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED, Respondent. No. CV-03-6120. United States District Court, E.D. New York. April 23, 2004. Daniel J. McInerney, Jr., Hill Rivkins & Hayden LLP., New York City, for Petitioner. Michael A. Haskel, Garden City, NY, for Respondent. MEMORANDUM AND ORD

*291 OPINION AND ORDER ¶1 On March 20,2012, Emily Blodgett filed with this Court a Petition for a Writ of Supervisory Control wherein she alleged that the Missoula County Justice Court violated §§ 3-10-231 through -234, MCA; Article VII, Sections 1 and 5 of the Montana

JUSTICE WHEAT delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶1 Chad W. Anderson (Chad) appeals from the findings of fact, *527 conclusions of law, decree of dissolution, and parenting plan of the Montana First Judicial District Court, Lewis a

March 22 2016 DA 15-0356 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2016 MT 68 IN THE MATTER OF: J.B., Jr., A Youth in Need of Care. APPEAL FROM: District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, In and For the County of Missoula, Cause No. DN 13-120

JUSTICE WHEAT delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶1 Tracy Marie Cumber and Randy Cumber (the Cumbers) appeal from the order of the Montana Seventeenth Judicial District Court, Valley County, granting Karen Higgins (Karen) visitation with the Cumbers’ child, C.T.C. We reverse the order and remand for proceedings c

December 21 2012 DA 11-0645 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2012 MT 303 STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. STUART LAURENCE LOZON, JR., Defendant and Appellant. APPEAL FROM: District Court of the Twenty-First Judicial District,

ATTORNEY GENERAL LOVING HAS ASKED ME TO RESPOND TO YOUR REQUEST FOR AN INFORMAL OPINION ADDRESSING, IN EFFECT, THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: 1. DOES THE WHEAT COMMISSION HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO REFUSE TO REISSUE REFUND WARRANTS THAT HAVE BEEN CANCELED 90 DAYS FROM DATE OF ISSUANCE BY OPERATION OF STATUTE? 2. IF THE COMMISSION DOES NOT HAVE THIS AUTHORITY, IS THERE A STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS CONTROLLING REISSUANCE OF CANCELED WARRANTS? BECAUSE THESE

MEMORANDUM ORDER JOSEPH N. LAPLANTE, District Judge. This case, based on fraud in the inducement, implicates the contours of the crime-fraud exception to the attorney client privilege. Plaintiff Rockwood Select Asset Fund XI, (6) — 1, LLC 'has suéd Karen McGinley, an attorney, and her law. firm, *474Devine, Millimet & Branch

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE May 9, 2001 Session KAREN GARRETT HUMPHRIES v. DAVID ALISON HUMPHRIES Appeal from the Chancery Court for Washington County No. 32330 Jean A. Stanley, Judge FILED JULY 23, 2001 No. E2000-02912-COA-R3-CV In this divorce case, the tria

OPINION ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice Karen Spease and Craig Spease, Appellants, filed suit against several defendants, including the Honorable Kathleen Oli-vares, Judge of the 205th District Court of El Paso County, Texas. This civil suit arises out of Appellants’ detention at the Sierra Blanca checkpoint by federal agents, their late

ATTORNEY GENERAL LOVING HAS ASKED ME TO RESPOND TO YOUR REQUEST FOR AN INFORMAL OPINION ADDRESSING, IN EFFECT, THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: 1. DOES THE WHEAT COMMISSION HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO REFUSE TO REISSUE REFUND WARRANTS THAT HAVE BEEN CANCELED 90 DAYS FROM DATE OF ISSUANCE BY OPERATION OF STATUTE? 2. IF THE COMMISSION DOES NOT HAVE THIS AUTHORITY, IS THERE A STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS CONTROLLING REISSUANCE OF CANCELED WARRANTS? BECAUSE THESE