⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

17 opinions for “Karl James Hauck”

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965-02-18 · Published · cited 14× · 341 F.2d 131; 52 C.C.P.A. 987
RICH, Judge. This appeal is from the decision of the Board of Patent Interferences, adhered to on reconsideration, awarding priorit> to Hauck. Hauck is involved on the basis of his application, serial No. 554,133, filed December 20, 1955. On a motion to shift the burden of proof he was given the benefit o
Hawaii Supreme Court · 2010-07-20 · Published · cited 22× · 235 P.3d 310; 123 Haw. 314; 2010 Haw. LEXIS 150
235 P.3d 310 (2010) BLUEEARTH BIOFUELS, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. HAWAIIAN ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC.; Maui Electric Company, Ltd.; Aloha Petroleum, Ltd.; and Karl E. Stahlkopf, Individually, Defendants-Appellants. No. 30144. Supreme Court of Hawai`i. July 20, 2010. *311 Paul Alston and Clyde J. Wadsworth (of Alston Hunt Floyd &
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2005-11-08 · Published · cited 12× · 836 N.E.2d 1001; 2005 Ind. App. LEXIS 2089; 2005 WL 2979630
836 N.E.2d 1001 (2005) Stephen C. HILBERT; the Thomas C. Hilbert Irrevocable Trust; the Thomas C. Hilbert Irrevocable Trust II; the Stephen C. Hilbert and Stephen C. Hilbert August 1998 Trust; the Todd S. Hilbert Irrevocable Trust; the Christopher L. Myers Irrevocable Trust; and the Heather Dawn Hilbert Irrevocable Trust, Appellants-Defendants, v. CONSECO SERVICES, L.L.C., Appellee-Plaintiff. No. 29A02-0410-CV-895.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963-07-18 · Published · cited 31× · 320 F.2d 157
320 F.2d 157 TIDEWATER OIL COMPANY, Appellant,v.George E. JACKSON and Karl B. Jackson, doing business in partnership as Jackson Brothers, Appellees. No. 6944. United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit. June 21, 1963. Rehearing Denied July 18, 1963. James P. Hart, Austin, Tex., and Richar
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2002-02-22 · Published · cited 23× · 188 F. Supp. 2d 532; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3441; 2002 WL 276484
188 F.Supp.2d 532 (2002) Richard VIETH, Norma Jean Vieth, and Susan Furey, Plaintiffs, v. Commonwealth of PENNSYLVANIA, et al., Defendants. Civ. No. 1:CV-01-2439. United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. February 22, 2002. *533 *534 Daniel T. Brier, Donna A. Walsh, Myers, Brier & K
District Court, C.D. California · 1997-11-14 · Published · cited 15× · 997 F. Supp. 1244; 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18776; 1997 WL 851249
997 F.Supp. 1244 (1997) LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Pete WILSON, et al., Defendants. CHILDREN WHO WANT AN EDUCATION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Pete WILSON, et al., Defendants. Barbara AYALA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Pete B. WILSON, et al., Defendants. GREGORIO T., by and through his guardian ad litem, JOSE T.; et al., Plaintiffs, v. Pete WILSON, in his capacity as Governor of the
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001-06-15 · Published · cited 22× · 775 A.2d 174; 341 N.J. Super. 216
775 A.2d 174 (2001) CITY OF ORANGE TOWNSHIP, a municipal corporation of New Jersey, Plaintiff, v. EMPIRE MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC., a corporation of New Jersey; N.J. Division Of Motor Vehicle Services; Ron Tooks and Roxanne Tooks Ely; M. Collymore; R. Mercurius; Yvette Washington; Shanitta Lawson and Alex M. Lawson, Defendants, and Nwakozoh Remi Okafor, Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Respondent, IMC Mortgage Company, a Florida corporation, Defen
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000-03-27 · Published · cited 14× · 207 F.3d 1373; 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 5140
207 F.3d 1373 (Fed. Cir. 2000) G0LLEHON FARMING, GOLLEHON GRAIN CO., GREG P. ALZHEIMER, JIM ANDERSON, LARRY F. ARENDT, ARMSTRONG FARMS, BAR TRIANGLE J RANCH, B.M. (BUD) BEASTROM, JAMES BEASTROM, CECIL BENJAMIN, DELLAS BENTZ, CARTER BERG, ET AL, DENNIS BERTSCH, HERMAN BERTSCH, ROGER BERTSCH, MYRNA BERTSCH, RANDY BERTSCH, PIUS BLACK, ARLO BODIN, SIDNEY BOE, ALBERT L. BOECKEL, GAYLEN E. BRANDT, GILBERT BRAUN, ERVIN BREN, BUDAK FARMS, BART BURDICK, JER
Combs v. Comairpublic domain
District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2008-01-03 · Published · cited 0× · 556 F. Supp. 2d 665
OPINION AND ORDER KARL S. FORESTER, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the motions of Comair, Inc., et al. (“Comair”) [DE # 539] and Bombardier, Inc. (“Bombardier”) [DE #736] pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) to dismiss claims by various Plain*669tiffs for loss of consortium, pre-impact fear, and hedonic and loss of enjoyment
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968-03-22 · Published · cited 34× · 390 F.2d 58
OREN HARRIS, Chief District Judge. The appellants bring these appeals from convictions by a jury and judgments *60 entered thereon finding them guilty upon each of two counts of an indictment. The Grand Jury of the Southern District of Iowa on May 26, 19
District Court, C.D. California · 1995-11-20 · Published · cited 35× · 908 F. Supp. 755; 95 Daily Journal DAR 15504; 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17720; 1995 WL 699583
908 F.Supp. 755 (1995) LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Pete WILSON, et al., Defendants. CHILDREN WHO WANT AN EDUCATION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Pete WILSON, et al., Defendants. Barbara AYALA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Pete B. WILSON, et al., Defendants. GREGORIO T., By and Through his guardian ad litem, JOSE T.; et al., Plaintiffs, v. Pete WILSON, in his capacity as Governor of the
District Court, E.D. Texas · 2012-06-26 · Published · cited 6× · 877 F. Supp. 2d 498; 2012 WL 2423515; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88244
MEMORANDUM OPINION THAD HEARTFIELD, District Judge. Having granted Defendants’ motion for summary judgment [Clerk’s Docket No. 93], the Court now ENTERS this Memorandum Opinion explaining the reasons therefor. Background On December 3, 1998, Plaintiff Barbara Allamon survived a nearly catastrophic car accident while traveling in her vehicle in the course
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971-07-15 · Published · cited 1× · 442 F.2d 982; 58 C.C.P.A. 1221
LANE, Judge. This appeal is from the decision of the Board of Patent Interferences awarding priority to appellees (hereafter Pieper) on the following count: 1. A process for the production of a solid polyethylene which comprises (1) reducing titanium tetrachloride with aluminum and (2) contacting ethylene
United States Court of Claims · 1967-04-14 · Published · cited 14× · 375 F.2d 829; 179 Ct. Cl. 632; 376 F.2d 829; 1967 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 212
PeR Curiam: This contract case was referred to Trial Commissioner William E. Day, pursuant to Rule 57(a), for findings of fact and a recommendation for a conclusion of law. The commissioner has filed his report containing an opinion, proposed findings of fact, and a recommended conclusion of law. He would hold that plaintiff is not entitled to recover and therefore its petition shoul
District Court, E.D. New York · 1944-06-16 · Published · cited 4× · 55 F. Supp. 837; 1944 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2301
55 F.Supp. 837 (1944) UNITED STATES v. BREGLER et al. Civ. A. Nos. 3197, 2967, 3120, 3087, 3352, 3034, 2953, 2979. District Court, E. D. New York. June 16, 1944. *838 Harold M. Kennedy, U. S. Atty., of Brooklyn, N. Y. (Frank J. Parker, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Brooklyn, N. Y., Jack London, of Washington, D. C., Louis Bender, of New
District Court, S.D. California · 1955-06-08 · Published · cited 4× · 132 F. Supp. 185; 1955 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3007
132 F.Supp. 185 (1955) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Sam TITLE, a/k/a Sam Teitelman, Defendant. Civ. No. 17368. United States District Court S. D. California, Central Division. June 8, 1955. *186 Laughlin E. Waters, U. S. Atty., by James R. Dooley, and Arline Martin, Asst. U. S. Attys., Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000-03-27 · Published · cited 0× · 207 F.3d 1373; 2000 WL 310255
CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs-appellants Gollehon Farming and 347 other farmers and grain elevator companies (hereinafter “Gollehon Farming”) appeal the decision of the United States District Court for the District of Montana dismissing their monetary, declaratory, and class action claims against the United States based on alleged mis-measurement of the protein content of wheat inspected by the Federal Grain Inspecti