⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

4 opinions for “Kater v. Churchill Downs Incorporated”

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018-03-28 · Published · cited 7× · 886 F.3d 784
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CHERYL KATER, individually and on No. 16-35010 behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:15-cv-00612- v. MJP CHURCHILL DOWNS INCORPORATED, a Kentucky corporation, OPINION
Wilson v. PTT, LLCpublic domain
District Court, W.D. Washington · 2018-12-14 · Published · cited 6× · 351 F. Supp. 3d 1325
Ronald B. Leighton, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant PTT, LLC's ("High 5") Motion to Dismiss. Dkt. # 34. The underlying dispute is a class action to recover money lost playing electronic gambling games available through mobile apps. High 5 argues that the Complaint should be dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction and failure to state a clai
District Court, W.D. Washington · 2018-11-20 · Published · cited 11× · 349 F. Supp. 3d 1028
Ronald B. Leighton, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendants Playtika, Ltd., Playtika Holding Corp., and Ceasars Interactive Entertainment, LLC.'s (collectively "Playtika") Motion to Dismiss and Strike. Dkt. # 40. The underlying dispute is a class action to recover money lost playing electronic gambling games available through different platforms, incl
District Court, N.D. California · 2018-12-19 · Published · cited 25× · 354 F. Supp. 3d 1094
JON S. TIGAR, United States District Judge Once again, the parties are before the Court regarding a rule issued recently by the Attorney General and the Department of Homeland Security. The rule, in combination with a Presidential proclamation, makes anyone who crosses the southern border of the United States somewhere other than a designated port of entry ineligible for asylum. Plaintiffs previously asked the Cour