Cases

285 S.W.3d 99 (2009) Kathleen Marie Kasparik STOLL, Mary Frances Kasparik Evans, Leslie Loyce Kasparik Morris, and Gordon Morris, Appellants, v. Karen L. HENDERSON, Individually and as Independent Executrix of the Estate of Edward F. Kasparik, Deceased, Appellee. No. 01-07-00733-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (1st Dist.). February 26, 2009.

USCA4 Appeal: 24-1707 Doc: 50 Filed: 06/04/2025 Pg: 1 of 21 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-1707 T.M.; J.M.; A.M., Plaintiffs – Appellants, v. UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND MEDICAL SYSTEM CORPORATION; BALTIMORE WASHINGTON MED

632 F.Supp.2d 700 (2008) AVERY DENNISON CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. ALIEN TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, Defendant. No. 08 CV 795. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. December 4, 2008. *702 Jay R. Campbell, Joshua M. Ryland, Kyle B. Fleming, Mark C. Johnson, Todd R. Tucker, Renner, Otto, Boisselle & Sklar, Clev

[Cite as Bank of Am., N.A. v. Farris, 2015-Ohio-4980.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 102256 BANK OF AMERICA, NA PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE

ACCEPTED 15-25-00015-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 4/30/2025 2:12 PM No. 15-25-00

McCann, John S., J. INTRODUCTION The plaintiff Robert Lemansky is represented by David A. Wojcik, Esq. and Nicole B. Capriolo, Esq. The defendants Raymond Mrzyglod, Brian Donegan, Thomas Ciras, Leonard Cardinal, Jr., Candace Sutherland and Frank Lombardi, all as Members of the Charlton Zoning Board of Appeals, are represented by James F. Cosgrove, Esq. and Susanne R. Blatt, Esq.

OPINION PER CURIAM. ¶ 1 In response to a severe budget crisis in early 2009, the State abruptly suspended certain services to developmentally disabled persons and cut by 10 percent the rates it pays for other services to the developmentally disabled. Days after the cuts were announced, plaintiffs filed a complaint and, after an accelerated two-day hearing, won an order enjoining the measures. Although plaintiffs

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-1092 NORTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP; CHAPEL HILL- CARRBORO NAACP; GREENSBORO NAACP; HIGH POINT NAACP; MOORE COUNTY NAACP; STOKES COUNTY BRANCH OF THE NAACP; WINSTON SALEM – FORSYTH COUNTY NAACP, Plaintiffs - Appellees, v. KEN

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT NETCHOICE, LLC, doing business No. 23-2969 as NetChoice, D.C. No. 5:22-cv-08861- Plaintiff - Appellee, BLF v. OPINION ROB BONTA, Attorney General Of The State Of California, Defendant - A

ORDER NEIL V. WAKE, District Judge. Before the Court is Plaintiffs Mary Rose and Earl Wilcox’s Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement and Stay Discovery Obligations (Doc. 355). The motion was argued and evidence taken on May 11, 2012 (Doc. 396). The Court gave an oral ruling for Wilcox, with this written order to follow. Wilcox’s motion will be granted and judgment entered in accordance with the settlement a

(2008) Dr. Steven MacARTHUR, et al., Plaintiffs, v. SAN JUAN COUNTY, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 2:00-CV-584BSJ. United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division. July 2, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER RE: POST-MANDATE MOTIONS BRUCE S. JENKINS, Senior District Judge. On July 18, 2007, the United States Court of Appeals for the

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 19-1818 STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. SHELL OIL PRODUCTS CO., L.L.C.; CHEVRON CORP.; CHEVRON USA, INC.; EXXONMOBIL CORP.; BP, PLC; BP AMERICA, INC.; BP PRODUCTS NORTH AMERICA, INC.; ROYAL DUTCH SHELL P.L.C.; MOTIVA ENTERPRISES, L.L.C.; CITGO PETROLEUM CORP.; CONOCOPHILLIPS; CONOCOPHILLIPS CO.; PHIL

219 P.3d 216 (2009) ARIZONA ASSOCIATION OF PROVIDERS FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES, an Arizona nonprofit corporation; Beverly Hermon, individually and as legal guardian for Eric Hermon; Toni McCleod, as legal guardian for E.K. and R.K.; Reeves Foundation, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company; Dominic Barreras; Abrio Family Services and Support, Inc., an Arizona corporation; Family Partners, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company; Metro Care Servi

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1103 KENNETH ACKERMAN; JAMES ACKERMAN; APRIL ACKERMAN; MARY ACKERMAN, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Thomas Ackerman; CHARLES V. ADAMS; CHRISTIANNE M. ADAMS; JOHN ALEXIS; CHARLES J. ARKINS; LULA M. ARKINS; THOMAS J. ARNO; AMY H. ARNO, Both individually and as next friends of A.A. and E.A.; R

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 600 U. S. Part 1 Pages 1–65 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 27, 2023 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are reque

[Cite as 07/01/2002 Case Announcements, 2002-Ohio-3343.] The Supreme Court of Ohio CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS July 1, 2002 DISCIPLINARY CASES 2001-0412. Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Cleary. Patricia A. Cleary is reinstated to the practice of law. MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS 2002-0902. Butcher v. Lewis. Stark App. No. 2001CA00219, 2002-Ohi

174 P.3d 659 (2007) In the Matter of the Marriage of Michael Steven KING, Respondent, v. Brenda Leone KING, Petitioner. No. 79978-4. Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc. Argued May 31, 2007. Decided December 6, 2007. *661 Kathleen M. O'Sullivan, Rebecca S. Engrav, Perkins Coie LLP, Nicholas Peter Gellert, Attorn

HARRELL, J. FACTUAL BACKGROUND This is a companion case1 brought by residents of Jacksonville, Maryland,2 against Exxon Mobil Corporation (Petition*436er)3 for an underground gasoline leak from an Exxon Mobil-owned gasoline service station, located at the corner of

WILLIAMS, Senior Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part: I agree with much of the majority opinion but am constrained to dissent. In my view the Commission’s Order must be vacated for three reasons: I. The Commission’s justification of its switch in classification of broadband from a Title I inf

Affirmed by published opinion. Chief Judge TRAXLER wrote the opinion, in which Judge GREGORY concurred. Judge DUNCAN wrote a separate opinion concurring in the judgment. TRAXLER, Chief Judge: ExxonMobil Corporation (“Exxon”) and John R. Hicks (together, “Defendants”) appeal a district court order abstaining from exercising jurisdiction under the Colorado River doctrine in a case