Cases

RILEY, Chief Judge. John Maxwell Montin was committed to the Lincoln Regional Center (LRC) for a period of almost twenty years after a jury found him not responsible by reason of insanity. After his release, Montin brought suit in federal district court against various psychologists, psychiatrists, and other employees of the LRC, alleging defendants committed medical malpractice u

Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC2024-1098 ____________ FLORIDIANS PROTECTING FREEDOM, INC., et al., Petitioners, vs. KATHLEEN C. PASSIDOMO, et al., Respondents. August 21, 2024 MUÑIZ, C.J. Before the Court is a petition for a writ of quo warranto. The

MOORE, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which SUTTON, J., joined. ALARCÓN, J. (pp. 665-66), delivered a separate dissenting opinion. OPINION KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge. Kathleen Benison was a tenured professor of geology at Central Michigan University (“CMU”). In 2011, Kathleen’s husband Christopher Benison, an undergraduate student at CMU, sponsored a vote of no confidenc

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT PATRICIA HARO; JOHN G. No. 11-16606 BALENTINE; JACK MCNUTT; TROY HALL, D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellees, 4:09-cv-00134- DCB v. KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of ORDER AND the United States Department of AMENDED Health and Human Services,

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 600 U. S. Part 1 Pages 1–65 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 27, 2023 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are reque

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. ----------------------------------------------------------------- No. 56 In the Matter of Jesse Friedman, Appellant, v. Kathleen M. Rice, &c., Respondent. Ronald L. Kuby, for appellant. Judith R. Sternberg, for respondent. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, et al.; National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers et al.; Dist

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CHARLES G. MOORE; KATHLEEN F. No. 20-36122 MOORE, Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-01539- v. JCC UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, OPINION Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Wash

Governor Wes Moore, et al. v Maryland Hemp Coalition, et al., No. 1590, September Term 2023. Opinion by Friedman, J. HEADNOTES: ANTITRUST AND TRADE REGULATION — ARTICLE 41 MONOPOLY MARKET DEFINITION The first step a litigant must take when alleging an unconstitutional monopoly under Article 41 of the Maryland Declaration of Rights is to define the market that the alleged monopoly controls. ANTITRUST AND TRADE REGULATION — EXCEPTIONS TO ARTICLE 41 MONOPOLY — COMMON RIGHT EXCEPTION The Hemp Coalit

GREG NEELEY, Justice I concur with the majority’s opinion that the trial court did not err in the formula used' in calculating its damage award and fa refusing to allow the Weakses to assert the common law defenses of estoppel and laches. While I agree that' the Weakses waived error as to White’s failure to segregate between legal fees that were properly recoverable from those for which recovery was not authorized, I disa

Case: 09-10658 Document: 00511181859 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/22/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED July 21, 2010 No. 09-10658 Lyle W. Cayce

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA 2022-NCSC-99 No. 261A18-3 Filed 19 August 2022 NORTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE v. TIM MOORE, in his official capacity, and PHILIP BERGER, in his official capacity. Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE STATE OF DELAWARE, ex rel. ) KATHLEEN JENNINGS, Attorney ) General of the State of Delaware, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. N20C-09-097 MMJ CCLD ) BP AMERICA INC., BP P.L.C., ) CHEVRON CORPORATION, ) CHEVRON U.S.A. INC., ) CONOCOPHILLIPS,

(2008) Bruce A. STEWARD, Petitioner, v. Ernie MOORE, Warden, Respondent. No. 1:05CV551. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. March 26, 2008. OPINION & ORDER KATHLEEN McDONALD O'MALLEY, District Judge. On February 10, 2005 Petitioner, Bruce A. Steward ("Steward" or "Petitioner"), filed a petition for a writ of habeas

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA No. 331PA21 Filed 28 April 2023 COMMUNITY SUCCESS INITIATIVE; JUSTICE SERVED NC, INC; WASH AWAY UNEMPLOYMENT; NORTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP; TIMOTHY LOCKLEAR; DRAKARUS JONES; SUSAN MARION; HENRY HARRISON; ASHLEY CAHOON; and SHAKITA NORMAN v. TIMOTHY K. MOORE, in his official capacity as Speaker of the North Carolina House of Representatives; PHI

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED July 22, 2010 No. 09-10658 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk TEXAS CLINICAL LABS INC;

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 735 SYLLABUS 1. The district court erred in instructing the jury that an essential element of the crime charged — the permanent loss of the function of a bodily member — was established. 2. Harmless error analysis is inapplicable when the jury is instructed that an essential element of t

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT J.H., the mother, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES and GUARDIAN AD LITEM, Appellees. No. 4D19-718 ________________________ Y.H.B., the grandmother,

McMahon, C.J.: Following a bench trial, the Court, for its findings of fact, conclusions of law, and verdict: Findings of Fact on Liability I.The Parties 1. Plaintiffs in Moore v. Navillus Tile, Inc., No. 14 Civ. 8326 (“the Moore Action”), are Trustees of four different groups of multi-employer fringe benefit funds. 2. Pl

ORDER MELLOY, Chief Judge. This matter appears before the court on the Defendants’ resisted motion for summary judgment on the pollution exclusion issue, filed April 1,1992, and the Plaintiffs resisted motion to certify a question of law to the Iowa Supreme Court, filed June 1, 1992. The Defendants’ motion, authored by American Insurance Company and National Surety Corporation,

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Commonwealth of Pennsylvania : Acting by Attorney General, : Kathleen Kane, : Plaintiff : : v. : : Golden Gate National Senior Care LLC; : GGNSC Holdings LLC; GGNSC : Administrative Services LLC; GGNSC : Clinical Services LLC; GGNSC Equity : Holdings