Cases

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-21-00008-CV JEFFREY J. MARKEY, APPELLANT V. KATHRYN L. MARKEY, APPELLEE On Appeal from the 53rd District Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION FILED Apr 15 2016, 8:25 am Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), CLERK this Memorandum Decision shall not be Indiana Supreme Court

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT JOSEPH C. DOUGLAS, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. )

*383Dwyer, J. ¶37 (concurring) — I agree that the judgment should be affirmed. I also agree that the crime of animal cruelty in the first degree is an alternative means crime. However, because this court, in State v. Peterson, 174 Wn. App. 828, 301 P.3d 1060 (2013), misidentified the means by which the crime can be committed, and because the majority opinion p

138 N.W.2d 882 (1965) Kathryne Raejean JEFFRIES, Appellee, v. James Edward JEFFRIES, Appellant. No. 51870. Supreme Court of Iowa. December 14, 1965. Rehearing Denied February 8, 1966. *883 R. L. Fehseke, Fort Madison, for appellant. Napier & Napier, Fort Madison, for appellee. RAWLINGS, Justice.

KUHN, J. | .¿Defendant, Benson Harrison O’Brien, III, was originally charged by grand jury indictment with second degree murder, a violation of La. R.S. 14:30.1, and pled not guilty. The State subsequently amended the indictment to charge defendant with manslaughter, a violation of La. R.S. 14:31, and defendant pled guilty to the amended charge. The trial court sentenced defendant to forty years imprisonment at hard

Standridge, J.: Amy Sanchez, individually and as next friend of her son, Austin Sanchez (Plaintiffs), sued Unified School District No. 469 (USD 469); Kerry Brungardt, the Lansing Middle School principal; and two students and their parents seeking damages allegedly resulting from the students' bullying of Austin. Eventually, the only claim that remained was Plaintiffs’ claim of neg

OPINION ¶ 1 Plaintiff Kathryn Sohm appeals the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendants Dixie Eye Center; Ronald L. Snow, M.D.; and Jeffry R. Ricks, O.D. Plaintiff alleges that summary judgment was improper because (1) the trial court granted judgment on the basis of damages, an issue that was not raised nor briefed by the parties, and (2) even if the parties did not address the issue, Plaintiff met her burden with respect to damages. We reverse

ESTATE OF CHARLES K. MCCLATCHY, DECEASED, WILLIAM K. COBLENTZ AND JAMES MCCLATCHY, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RespondentCoblentz v. Commissioner (In re Estate of McClatchy)Docket No. 21876-93.

855 A.2d 900 (2004) TIG SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner v. M. Diane KOKEN, in her capacity as Insurance Commissioner of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, as Statutory Liquidator of HRM Health Plans (PA), Inc., Edward Borst, Julia Campion, Thomas P. Clark, Janet Y. Cosby-Dyer, William R. Friedman, Lawrence Kaye, Adele Kimpbell, Tracy C. Kuehni, Leland G. LeBlanc, Paul A. Leland, Gary T. McIlroy, M.D., Donald Mitrane, M.D., Robert L. Montgo

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS ______________________________________ ) CAN SOFTTECH, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) No. 24-1009 ) v. ) Filed: October 1, 2024 ) THE UNITED STATES, ) Re-issued: October 15, 2024 ∗

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS ______________________________________ ) CAN SOFTTECH, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) No. 24-1009 ) v. ) Filed: December 20, 2024 ) THE UNITED STATES, ) Re-issued: January 2, 2025 ∗

PREtrial Order No. 13 Regarding Rule 404 (b), H. Cervantes’s Motions in Li-mine Nos. 10 and 11, and Larez’s Motion in Limine No. 5 Re: Dkt. Nos. 827, 838, 839 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE Pending before the Court is Defendant Henry Cervantes’s (“H. Cervantes”) motion in limine number 10 to exclude noticed Rule 404(b) evidence (Docket No. 888), H.

MANION, Circuit Judge. Putnam County Sheriff Philip Hansen terminated Kathryn Zorzi from her job as dispatcher in the sheriffs office. Because she was fired, and later because she was not reinstated by the newly elected sheriff, Zorzi sued. This is an interlocutory appeal from orders entered on counts one, two and five of Zorzi’s Second Amended Complaint. Counts one and two are

801 A.2d 469 (2002) BOLD CORP., As Trustee for Masspa Realty Trust, t/d/b/a Lancaster Host Resort and Conference Center; Inn Management Services, Inc., t/d/b/a Eden Resort Inn and Conference Center; First DFI Partnership, L.P., t/d/b/a The Ramada Inn; Continental Inns of America, Inc., t/d/b/a Continental Inn; Historic Realty, Inc., t/d/b/a Historic Strasburg Inn; Family Time of Hershey Farm, Inc., t/d/b/a Hershey Farm Restaurant & Motor Inn; Dommel'

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ASPEN, District Judge: The plaintiff, Universal Bonding Insurance Company, a New Jersey Corporation brought this contractual indemnity action against the corporate defendant, Esko & Young, Inc. (“Esko”), and the individual defendants Albert Ira Rosenberg and Theresa A. Rosenberg. Jurisdiction is based on diversity of citizenship, 28 U.S.C. § 1332. The Rosenbergs have moved

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER VAZQUEZ, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Trustee of Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Qudrat Kapoor’s Motion to Join Additional Party [Doc. No. 420], Motion to Withdraw as Counsel of Record for Third-Party Defendant Eastern New Mexico Medical Center [Doc. No. 427], and Motion of Chaves County to Consolidate Above-Styled Cases [D

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0143p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, │ Plain

In the United States Court of Federal Claims Nos. 18-204C, 18-206C, 18-207C, 18-208C, 18-211C, 18-214C, 18-216C, 18-220C, 18-229C, 18-238C, 18-239C, 18-245C, 18-246C, 18-248C, 18-251C, 18-252C, 18-261C, 18-275C, 18-328C (consolidated) (Filed: March 23, 2018) ************************************** * * FMS INVESTMENT CORP., et al., *

STERN, P.J.A.D. (concurring). As the majority develops, plaintiffs appeal from an order of December 7, 2001 which grants summary judgment to defendants and dismisses their complaint with prejudice in this case involving injuries sustained by a sixteen-month old minor. The injuries were caused by defendants’ son who was less than six years old at the time. Plaintiffs argue that “the trial c