Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Kathy King”
Cecilia Eubanks v. Kathy May Huberpublic domain
KING, JUSTICE, FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. In the first iteration of this case, the chancery court examined the principles underlying quantum meruit and found that Vincent Castigliola and David Kiyhet, attorneys for the estate of Dane Eubanks, should be awarded attorneys' fees from two minors out of a settlement they, and only they, obtained. After remand from this Court, the chancery court, for the second
Judith C. Smith v. Kathy Ann Kingpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2005-IA-01651-SCT JUDITH C. SMITH v. KATHY ANN KING, CHARLES SMITH, JR., MARGARET SMITH BRITT AND SHEILA SMITH GEORGE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/02/2005 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. EDWARD E. PATTEN, JR. COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: LINCOLN COUNTY CHANCERY COURT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: W. BRADY KEL
Kathy May Huber v. Cecilia Eubankspublic domain
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI DICKINSON, Presiding Justice, for the Court: ¶ 1. Attorneys representing the admin-istratrix of an estate settled wrongful-death claims under two insurance policies without filing a wrongful-death lawsuit. The proceeds of the settlement of the first policy were distributed equally to the wrongful-death beneficiaries. The attorneys submitted the proceeds of the second polic
Schwarz v. Kingpublic domain
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus to compel the respondent Kathy J. King, an Acting Justice of the Supreme Court, Kings County, inter alia, to hold an evidentiary hearing in a pending Mental Hygiene Law article 81 proceeding and direct the respondent Helene Schwarz to produce all discovery items sought by the petitioners at least 10 days before the hearing, and in the nature of prohibition, among other things, to prohibit th
King v. Smithpublic domain
—In a proceeding pursuant to Election Law article 16, inter alia, to preserve for judicial review the ballots cast in the Democratic Party primary election held on September 9, 2003, for the office of Judge of the Civil Court of the City of New York from the County of Kings, 7th Municipal District, the New York City Board of Elections appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Polizzi, J.), dated September
King v. Head Start Family Hair Salons, Inc.public domain
Kathy King appeals from the trial court's preliminary injunction enforcing a noncompetition agreement between King and Head Start Family Hair Salons, Inc. ("Head Start"). We reverse and remand. King has worked as a hair stylist for over 25 years. She is a single mother and provides financial support for her daughter, who is in college. Hair styling is King's only vocation. During the 25 years she has been a hair stylist, King has been employed by several different entities rend
Samuel S. v. Kingpublic domain
*1006The underlying motion was decided in an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated September 23, 2011. Accordingly, this proceeding has been rendered academic. Dillon, J.P, Balkin, Eng and Cohen, JJ., concur.
Chester King Burnham v. Joseph A. Kwentuspublic domain
MAXWELL, J., for the Court: ¶ 1. For more than fifty years, Chester Burnham had crossed his neighbor’s property along Ridge Road, a private road that ran from a public road to Burnham’s landlocked property. Burnham’s neighbor testified this access was granted out of neighborly courtesy. His family knew Burnham used the road and “in the kindness of their hear
King v. Kingpublic domain
On Motion to Enforce Mandate PER CURIAM. We grant the motion to enforce this Court’s mandate in King v. King, 734 So.2d 470 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). The trial court is instructed to enter an order directing that the husband’s child support obligation will be $1,297 per month, retroactive to May 5, 1997. Further, pursuant to the reservation of jurisdiction contained in paragraph 7 of the rep
¶ 1. Corporate Management, Inc. (CMI) is a private hospital and nursing home administrator that managed the Greene Rural Health Center (GRHC), the public hospital and nursing home in Greene County. CMI sued Greene County Board of Supervisors and others for breach of contract when the Greene County Board of Supervisors purported to terminate CMI's contract to manage GRHC. The Greene County Board of Supervisors retained Heber Simmons and Simmons Law Group (hereinafter collectively refer
King v. Commissionerpublic domain
KATHY A. KING, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RespondentKing v. CommissionerNo. 5989-97United States Tax Court
Kilpatrick v. Kingpublic domain
499 F.3d 759 (2007) Devin KILPATRICK, Plaintiff-Appellant, Ronda Conn, Plaintiff, v. Pat KING; Kathy Carter; Ron Ross; Steven N. Wilson; Holly Brandt, Defendants-Appellees. No. 06-3134. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: June 11, 2007. Filed: August 22, 2007. *760
King v. Bellpublic domain
392 F.Supp.2d 964 (2005) Tommy KING, Petitioner, v. Ricky BELL, Warden, Respondent. No. 1:00-0017. United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division. September 27, 2005. *965 *966 *967 Kelley J. Henry, Federal Public Defender's Office, Nashvi
People v. Kingpublic domain
PRESIDING JUSTICE KNECHT delivered the opinion of the court: On September 16, 2003, the trial court adjudicated respondent, Johnny King, unfit and terminated his parental rights over the minor child, J.D., born March 17, 2001. Respondent appeals, arguing the court lacked jurisdiction to proceed with the adjudication of pare
Beckham v. General Motors Corp.public domain
¶ 1. Glenn Beckham lost control of his vehicle on October 11, 2000, striking a culvert and severely injuring himself. On January 3, 2003, Beckham filed a lawsuit alleging that General Motors Corporation ("GM") was negligent in that the air bag installed in his vehicle failed to deploy and that GM breached express and implied warranties of fitness for use. After a three day trial, the jury returned a verdict in favor of GM. Aggrieved by this, Beckham now appeals. Finding no error, we a
Embury v. Kingpublic domain
MEMORANDUM * Dr. Talmadge King and other individually named defendants appeal the district court’s denial of qualified immunity. Because we find that any property right that the plaintiff, Dr. Stephen Embury, might have had in his job was not clearly established, we reverse. Dr. Embury argues that we have no jurisdiction to consider whether he has a property interest in his job for due pr
Drew-King v. Deep Distributors of Greater NY, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER FEUERSTEIN, District Judge: Petitioner Kathy Drew-King, acting Regional Director of Region 29 of the National Labor Relations Board (“Petitioner” or “the Board”), brings this petition on the Board’s behalf seeking a temporary injunction pursuant to section 10(j) of the National Labor Relations Act (the “Act”), 29 U.S.C. § 160(j), pending the final disposition of unfair labor practice
Day v. Ocean Springs Hospital Systempublic domain
¶ 1. Jeanne Salter Day sued Ocean Springs Hospital System (OSHS) pursuant to the Mississippi Tort Claims Act, Mississippi Code Annotated § 11-46-1 to 23 (Rev. 2002). Day alleged that, when visiting a patient at the hospital, she slipped and fell on a puddle of water, injuring her wrist. After a bench trial, the lower court found that Day had failed to prove that the hospital was negligent. Day appeals, arguing (1) that the lower court improperly disr
Starr v. Statepublic domain
¶ 1. This appeal stems from the conviction in the Jackson County Circuit Court of June Allen Starr, Sr., 1 for aggravated domestic assault. He was sentenced to serve twenty years in the custody of the Mississippi Department of Corrections. Starr appeals, arguing that his Fifth Amendment rights were violated when police officers proceeded with a custodial interrogation having not obtained a Miranda waiver, or, in the alternati
Samuel Johnson v. Kathy Griffinpublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 23a0240p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ SAMUEL JOHNSON and JILL JOHNSON, in their │ individual capacities,