Cases

535 F.Supp.2d 898 (2008) Kathy M. KENEFICK, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. No. 07 C 4338. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. February 13, 2008. *899 Barry A. Schultz, Nastassia G. Johnson, The Law Offices of Barry A. Schultz, P.C., Evanston, IL, for Plainti

570 F.Supp.2d 708 (2007) Darlene JONES, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. ASTRUE,[1] Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. Civil Action No. 06-1778. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. September 25, 2007. October 15, 2007. *710 Michael Patrick Boyle, Philadelphia, PA, for Plaintiff. Ed

MEMORANDUM **** The facts and procedural posture of the case are known to the parties, and we do not repeat them here. *35The Ninth Circuit reviews a district court’s order upholding the denial of disability benefits de novo. Reddick v. Chater, 157 F.3d 715, 720 (9th Cir.1998). The Commissioner’s decision must be affirmed if

571 F.Supp.2d 1054 (2008) Kathleen PEIFFER, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. No. 4:08-cv-105 RWP-TJS. United States District Court, S.D. Iowa, Central Division. August 19, 2008. *1055 Thomas A. Krause, West Des Moines, IA, for Plaintiff. Gary L. Hayward, United States Attorney, D

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: MOTION TO REVERSE (DOCKET ENTRY # 17); DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO AFFIRM THE COMMISSIONER’S DECISION (DOCKET ENTRY # 21) BOWLER, United States Magistrate Judge. Pending before this court is a motion by plaintiff Heidi Dias (“plaintiff’) seeking to reverse the decision of defendant Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (the “Commissioner”). (Docket E