Cases

David Lynn Barnett seeks review by writ of error from the divorce decree entered by the trial court in the divorce action between David and respondent, Katrina Y. Barnett. For the reasons stated below, we dismiss the appeal. In order to have a successful appeal on a writ of error, the action must be (1) brought within six months of the trial court judgment; (2) by a party to the suit; (3) who did not participate in the trial; and (4) there must be error apparent from the face o

MARC E. JOHNSON, Judge. li>This is a domestic case involving the determination of fault and the denial of a motion for contempt; filed by Plaintiff. For the following reasons, we affirm in part, vacate in part, and render. FACTS & PROCEDURAL HISTORY The parties were married in March 1987. On November Í2, 2013, Plaintiff, Jac Barnett (“Jac”), filed a Petition for Divor

AMY, Judge. |, After the plaintiffs sustained damage to their Cameron Parish beach house as a result of Hurricane Ike, their flood insurance provider declared the policy void ab initio. They filed suit against their insurance'agency and the flood insurance provider, seeking damages for tort and contractual claims. The trial court denied pre-trial exceptions regarding subject matter jurisdiction and preemption by feder

FILED May 26 2020, 8:41 am CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals

O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge: Among other issues presented to us by this appeal from conviction and sentence for bank fraud, we are asked to re-examine whether the privilege against self-incrimination extends to out-of-court pre-arrest statements made to private individuals. I Oplinger was employed as supply coordinator for the

ORDER ROY B. DALTON, JR., District Judge. This cause is before the Court on the following: 1. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees (Doc. 179), filed April 11, 2012; *13162. Plaintiffs Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees (Doc. 181), filed April 25, 2012;

Schindler, J. ¶1 The “Local Government Whistle-blower Protection Act,” chapter 42.41 RCW, protects employees from retaliation for making a good faith report of improper governmental action. “Retaliatory action” is defined as either (a) any adverse change in the terms and *798 conditions of employment o

[Cite as State v. Booker, 2023-Ohio-4231.] COURT OF APPEALS DELAWARE COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO : JUDGES: : : Hon. W. Scott Gwin, P.J. Plaintiff-Appellee : Hon. Patricia A. Delaney, J.

78 So.3d 146 (2011) CHEF MENTEUR LAND COMPANY, LTD. v. Gary SANDROCK, et al. No. 2011-CA-0497. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. October 19, 2011. *147 Robert A. Barnett, Guste Barnett Schlesinger Henderson & Alpaugh, L.L.P., New Orleans, LA, for Plaintiff/Appellee. Ian E. Goldenberg, Ian E. Goldenberg, L.L

STATE OF LOUISIANA, * NO. 2022-CA-0425 DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATION, OFFICE * OF COMMUNITY COURT OF APPEAL DEVELOPMENT - DISASTER * RECOVERY UNIT FOURTH CIRCUIT * VERSUS STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* STEPHANIE B. POREE A/K/A STEPHANIE BROOKINS POREE

MADELEINE M. LANDRIEU, Judge. hDennis Driscoll suspensively appeals the trial court’s judgment that distributed funds deposited into the registry of the court among himself; his brother, John Driscoll; and his cousin, Eileen Moore Ma-zaleski, in her capacity as executrix of the succession of her deceased mother, Muriel Moore. For the reasons that follow, we amend the judgment in part and affirm as amended.

JOAN BERNARD ARMSTRONG, Chief Judge. | plaintiff-appellant, John Boutte, appeals a decision of the Civil Service Commission suspending him for thirty days. On December 12, 2005, the plaintiff-appellant, New Orleans Police Department Officer, John Boutte, received a letter from the Appointing Authority suspending him for thirty days for allegedly being absent without leave from September 3, 2005 through Se

ISHEE, J., for the Court: ¶ 1. In 2011, Henry Lee Craig was convicted of murdering Silas Miller. Craig was sentenced by the Jackson County Circuit Court to life in the custody of the Mississippi Department of Corrections (MDOC). Craig filed a motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) or, in the alternative, a new trial. The circuit court denied Craig’s motion. Aggrieved, Craig now appeals. Findi

30 So.3d 279 (2010) LAFAYETTE PARISH SCHOOL BOARD v. RATCLIFF CONSTRUCTION CO., et al. No. 09-762. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. February 3, 2010. Rehearing Denied March 24, 2010. *280 Ronald J. Fiorenza, Provosty, Sadler, DeLaunay, Fiorenza & Sobel, Alexandria, LA, for Defendant/Appellee, Ratc

546 F.Supp.2d 329 (2008) Lila STEPHENS, Individually and, All Those Similarly Situated v. RIMKUS CONSULTING GROUP, INC. OF LOUISIANA, et al. Civil Action No. 07-3243. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. March 3, 2008. Carl Nelson Finley, Carl N. Finley, Attorney at Law, Metairie, LA, for Lila Stephens. Shelley Hammond Provosty, Law Offices of Shelle

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2018-CA-00868-COA MARSHALL WILLIAM HERRIN APPELLANT v. LACEY NICOLE PERKINS, INDIVIDUALLY APPELLEE AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF K.W.H. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/14/2018 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. HAYDN JUDD ROBERTS COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED:

PALMER, J. After a jury found the defendant, Dustin Ruocco, guilty of burglary in the third degree and larceny in the third degree, the Appellate Court reversed his conviction upon concluding that it was plain error for the trial court not to instruct the jury, as mandated by General Statutes § 54-84(b), 1

5 So.3d 258 (2009) Cheryl BROWN, M.D. v. KIDNEY AND HYPERTENSION ASSOCIATES, L.L.P. No. 2008 CA 0919. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. January 12, 2009. *260 Robert A. Barnett, New Orleans, LA, for Plaintiff/Appellant, Cheryl Brown, M.D. Stephen D. Marx, Metairie, LA, for Defendants/Appellees, Kidney and Hypert

266 A.2d 863 (1970) STATE of Maine v. UNIVERSITY OF MAINE. Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. June 30, 1970. Garth K. Chandler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Augusta, for plaintiff. Henry Geller, Gen. Counsel, John H. Conlin, Associate Gen. Counsel, Katrina Renouf, Atty., F. C. C., Washington, D. C., for amicus curiae. Bernstein, Shur, Sawyer & Nelson, by Barnett I. Shur, Gregor

SUSAN M. CHEHARDY, Chief Judge. UThis matter began as a mortgage foreclosure by a bank under executory process. After seizure and sale of the property, various creditors asserted that their claims to the proceeds of the sale were superior to the mortgage. The bank appeals a judgment placing the bank’s claim third in line for the sale proceeds. We reverse. FACTS On March 20, 1986, Georg