Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Keene v. Mitchell”
Keene v. Mitchellpublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 08a0165p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Petitioner-Appellant, - MARVALLOUS KEENE,
Keene v. Mitchellpublic domain
525 F.3d 461 (2008) Marvallous KEENE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Betty MITCHELL, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. No. 05-3538. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: January 28, 2008. Decided and Filed: April 25, 2008. *462 ARGUED: Pamela Prude-Smithers, Public Defender's Office, Ohio Public Defender Co
Keene v. CNA Holdings, LLCpublic domain
GEATHERS, J.: **363In this wrongful death action, Appellant CNA Holdings, LLC challenges the circuit court's denial of its motions for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV), new trial absolute, and new trial nisi remittitur. Appellant argues the circuit court erred by concluding that Dennis Seay was not a statutory employee of Appellant
Mitchell v. Flemingpublic domain
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Marcus T. Mitchell appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition for failing to comply with a court order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma
Keene v, CNA Holdings, LLCpublic domain
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court Angela D. Keene, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Dennis Seay, Deceased, and Linda Seay, Respondents, v. CNA Holdings, LLC, Petitioner. Appellate Case No. 2019-000816 ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS Appeal from Spartanburg County D. Garrison Hill, Circuit Court Judge Opinion No. 28052 Heard June 11,
Keene v. Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc.public domain
121 F.Supp.2d 1063 (2000) Tricia KEENE, Individually, and Tricia Keene, as Next Friend for the Estate of Brandon Preston, Plaintiff, v. STURM, RUGER & COMPANY, INC., Defendant. No. Civ.A. 1:99CV323. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division. November 7, 2000. Mark O Midani, Midani & Associates, Houston, TX, for plaintiff. Edward H Gr
People v. Demarea Deshawn Mitchellpublic domain
The summaries of the Colorado Court of Appeals published opinions constitute no part of the opinion of the division but have been prepared by the division for the convenience of the reader. The summaries may not be cited or relied upon as they are not the official language of the division. Any discrepancy between the language in the summary and in the opinion should be resolved in favor of the language in the opinion.
People v. Mitchellpublic domain
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and
People v. Mitchellpublic domain
People v Mitchell (2019 NY Slip Op 01917) People v Mitchell 2019 NY Slip Op 01917 Decided on March 15, 2019 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary La
Keene v. Wake County Hospital Systems, Inc.public domain
HEDRICK, Chief Judge. Plaintiffs first contend the court made five errors in the instructions to the jury. Only two of these alleged errors have been *525properly preserved for appellate review. The other three present no question for review. N.C.R. App. Proc. 10(b)(2). Plaintiffs first argue that the court erred in its instructions when it mistaken
William Mitchell Keen v. the State of Texaspublic domain
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont __________________ NO. 09-25-00165-CR __________________ WILLIAM MITCHELL KEEN, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee ____________________________________________
Loza v. Mitchellpublic domain
705 F.Supp.2d 773 (2010) Jose Trinidad LOZA, Petitioner, v. Betty MITCHELL, Warden, Respondent. Case No. 1:98-cv-287. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. March 31, 2010. *782 James Allison Wilson, Jr., Monica Foster, Scott Allen Kossoudji, Vorys Sater Seymour & Pease, Columbus, OH, Laurence E. Komp, Bal
Mitchell Hollis Wright v. Statepublic domain
ACCEPTED 03-14-00469-CR 3852893 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS
ACCEPTED 03-13-00498-CV 6107077 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Mitchell Hollis Wright v. Statepublic domain
ACCEPTED 03-14-00468-CR 3852611 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS
Jose Loza v. Betty Mitchellpublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 14a0217p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X - JOSÉ TRINIDAD LOZA,
Julie C. W. v. Frank Mitchell W. Jr.public domain
02/26/2021 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE January 28, 2021 Session JULIE C. W. v. FRANK MITCHELL W. JR.1 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 13D-1587 Philip E. Smith, Judge
Keene Corp. v. Coleman (In Re Keene Corp.)public domain
164 B.R. 844 (1994) In re KEENE CORPORATION, Debtor. KEENE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. Jessie D. COLEMAN, et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 93 B 46090 (SMB). Adv. No. 94-8015A. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York. March 3, 1994. *845 *846 Berlack Israels & Lieberman (Carole L
SMITH Et Al. v. MITCHELL COUNTYpublic domain
McFadden, Judge. This appeal arises from a superior court’s final decree adopting the findings of a special master in a boundary line dispute. The appellants challenge the lack of an evidentiary hearing by the special master; however, they waived such a hearing. The appellants also *375 challenge th
ACCEPTED 03-13-00498-CV 4451721 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS