Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Elaine E. Bucklo, United States District Judge Albert Vaughn, Sr. (“Vaughn”), the administrator of his deceased son’s estate, claims that the City of Chicago and three of its police officers (collectively, “Defendants”) violated his son’s due process rights when they ordered him to drop his weapon during an altercation in West En-glewood and then failed to protect him

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs October 8, 2013 CLARENCE DEWAYNE HAYES v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2006-B-1257 Seth Norman, Judge No. M2013-00605-CCA-R3-PC Filed October 17, 2013 The petitioner, Clarence Dewayne Hayes, appeals the Davidson County Criminal Cou

STEADMAN, Senior Judge: This case comes before us as an expedited interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion to dismiss indictments against him on the basis of double jeopardy so as to bar a retrial. Appellant does not dispute that he consented to the mistrial in the initial proceeding, but contends that his consent was obtained in violation of his Sixth Amendment right to effective and conflict

JUDE G. GRAVOIS, Judge. ^Plaintiffs filed this action in 2009 seeking recovery of damages resulting from the wrongful deaths of their decedents as a result of their decedents’ exposure to naturally occurring radioactive material (“NORM”), and other hazardous, toxic, and carcinogenic radioactive material, including technologically enhanced radioactive material (“TERM”), that accumulated on the inside of pipes used in oil prod

RIPPLE, Circuit Judge. Anthony Horton appeals from the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. Mr. Horton was convicted of three counts of first degree sexual assault of a child, in violation of Wis. Stat. § 948.02(1). He appealed his convictions, alleging that he was deprived of his right to pre

HANS J. LILJEBERG, Judge. | ^Appellees, Exxon Mobil Corporation, Exxon Mobil Oil Corporation and Humble Incorporated, filed a motion to dismiss the appeal filed by appellants, Karen Alexie Rodrigue, Hermina McCall and Edna Raymond. For the following reasons, we grant appellees’ motion to dismiss the appeal and remand this matter back to the trial court to enter a written judgment on appellants’ motions to dismiss with prej

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State v. Garrett, Slip Opinion No. 2022-Ohio-4218.] NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or

693 A.2d 781 (1997) 345 Md. 525 Clarence CONYERS, Jr. v. STATE of Maryland. No. 39, September Term, 1996. Court of Appeals of Maryland. May 8, 1997. *785 Michael R. Braudes, Asst. Public Defender (Stephen E. Harris, Public Defender; Margaret L. Lanier, Asst. Public Defender, on brief), Baltimore, for appel