⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

12 opinions for “Keita v. Ford”

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2021-12-21 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion issued December 21, 2021 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-20-00176-CR NO. 01-20-00177-CR ——————————— MAHAMET KEITA, Appellant V. THE STATE
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2022-06-17 · Published · cited 0× · 170 N.Y.S.3d 813; 76 Misc. 3d 1; 2022 NY Slip Op 22201
People v Searles (2022 NY Slip Op 22201) People v Searles 2022 NY Slip Op 22201 [76 Misc 3d 1] Accepted for Miscellaneous Reports Publication Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department, 2d, 11th and 13th Judicial Districts Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursu
King v. Peoplepublic domain
Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2017-08-21 · Published · cited 0× · 67 V.I. 903
OPINION OF THE COURT (August 21,2017) Cabret, Associate Justice. Lawrence King appeals the Superior Court’s November 18, 2015 judgment and commitment, arguing that the Superior Court erred by sentencing King instead of finding him not guilty by reason of insanity. Because the People did not prove King’s sanity beyond a reasonable doubt, we reverse the Superior Court’s November 18,
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2002-01-15 · Published · cited 0× · 807 So. 2d 946; 2002 WL 54358
| JAMES L. CANNELLA, Judge. Plaintiff, Genevieve Kennedy, appeals the amount of damages awarded in an automobile accident case against, Defendant, Allstate Insurance Company (Allstate), Plaintiffs uninsured/underinsured motorist insurance (UM) carrier. We affirm. On May 16, 1998, the 51 year old Plaintiff was struck broadside by a car that ran a stop sign at the intersection of U.S. Highway 90 and Louisia
Court of Appeals of Nevada · 2025-12-23 · Published · cited 0× · 141 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 70
141 Nev., Advance Opinion IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA KENYA KEITA HALL, No. 90025-COA Appellant, vs. RONALD OLIVER, WARDEN, Respondent. ANTHONY POSEY, No. 90152-COA Appellant,
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016-09-01 · Published · cited 46× · 835 F.3d 479; 101 Fed. R. Serv. 375; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 16204; 2016 WL 4547206
Affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded by published opinion. Judge DIAZ wrote the opinion, in which Judge DUNCAN joined. Senior Judge DAVIS wrote a dissenting opinion. ON REHEARING DIAZ, Circuit Judge: A jury convicted Alejandro “Alex” Garcia-Lagunas of conspiracy to distribute or possess with intent to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a), 846. He was sentenced
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000-07-10 · Published · cited 43× · 432 Mass. 82; 731 N.E.2d 1066; 2000 Mass. LEXIS 377
Spina, J. The defendant was convicted of murder in the first degree on theories of deliberate premeditation and felony-*83murder.1 He was also convicted of burglary. On appeal he claims error in the denial of his motion to suppress statements he made to police, and the denial of his motion for required findings of not guilty. We affirm the conv
District Court, District of Columbia · 2004-06-01 · Published · cited 13× · 319 F. Supp. 2d 57; 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9969; 2004 WL 1208958
319 F.Supp.2d 57 (2004) Liberata DIATTA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A.03-2653 (RCL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. June 1, 2004. *58 *59 Robert I. Berlow, Crownsville, MD, for Plaintiffs. Urenthea McQuinn, Office of the
United States Court of International Trade · 2012-04-19 · Published · cited 0× · 2012 CIT 51
Slip Op. 12- 51 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE _________________________________________ : ALMOND BROS. LUMBER CO. : et al. : : Plaintiffs, : Judge: Richard K. Eaton : v.
Doe v. Nestle, S.A.public domain
District Court, C.D. California · 2010-09-08 · Published · cited 5× · 748 F. Supp. 2d 1057; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98991; 2010 WL 3969615
748 F.Supp.2d 1057 (2010) John DOE I, Individually and on behalf of Proposed Class Members; John Doe II, Individually and on behalf of Proposed Class Members; John Doe III, Individually and on behalf of Proposed Class Members; Global Exchange, Plaintiffs, v. NESTLE, S.A.; Nestle U.S.A.; Nestle Ivory Coast; Archer Daniels Midland Co.; Cargill, Inc.; Cargill Cocoa; Cargill West Africa, S.A.; and Corporate Does 1-10, Defendants.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012-08-21 · Published · cited 299× · 52 A.3d 1139; 617 Pa. 107; 2012 Pa. LEXIS 1890
OPINION Justice TODD*. In this appeal, our Court is presented with two questions: (1) whether a defendant’s convictions for first-degree murder and other crimes which rest solely on subsequently recanted out-of-court statements given to police violate the due process guarantees of either the United States or Pennsylvania Constitutions; and (2) whether the confessions of
State v. Carrutherspublic domain
Tennessee Supreme Court · 2000-12-11 · Published · cited 1286× · 35 S.W.3d 516; 2000 Tenn. LEXIS 683; 2000 WL 1824442
DROWOTA, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which ANDERSON, C.J., HOLDER, and BARKER, JJ., joined. Tony Carruthers and James Montgomery were each convicted of three counts of first degree premeditated murder and were sentenced to death on each conviction. The Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the convictions and sentences of both Carruthers and Montgomery. Thereafter, the c