Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Keith Duane Rodgers”
Jorgenson v. Agway, Inc.public domain
627 N.W.2d 391 (2001) 2001 ND 104 Steve JORGENSON; Ed Loraas; Jeff Nitschke; Kevin Alexander; Roger Amble; David Baldson; Joe Bata; Jared Benson; Rick Benson; Rodger Benson; Don Berge; Lowell Berntson; Neal Berntson; Darrel Biby; Lane Bina; Arvid and John Boe, dba Boe Farms; Arlen Bonde; C-C Seil Farm, Inc.; Jim Cook; Dennis Crockett; Darryl Dahl; Keith and Ted Dahl; Allan and Randy Darling; Tim Du-Bois; Gerald Eberle; Greg Entzmi
Aetna Better Health of N.C.public domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA 2021-NCCOA-486 No. COA21-97 Filed 21 September 2021 Wake County, No. 20 CVS 10656 AETNA BETTER HEALTH OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC., Petitioner, NORTH CAROLINA PROVIDER OWNED PLANS, INC., d/b/a MY HEALTH by HEALTH PROVIDERS, Intervenor, v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent, and WELLCARE OF N
Aetna Better Health of N.C.public domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA 2021-NCCOA-486 No. COA21-97 Filed 21 September 2021 Wake County, No. 20 CVS 10656 AETNA BETTER HEALTH OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC., Petitioner, NORTH CAROLINA PROVIDER OWNED PLANS, INC., d/b/a MY HEALTH by HEALTH PROVIDERS, Intervenor, v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent, and WELLCARE OF N
Micheal Leslie Lake v. Michael Skeltonpublic domain
MARTIN, Circuit Judge, dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc: The Eleventh Amendment to the U.S. Constitution gives states immunity from being sued in federal court. Hans v. Louisiana, 134 U.S. 1, 14-17, 10 S.Ct. 504, 507-08, 33 L.Ed. 842 (1890). The state’s immunity, known as sovereign immunity, also extends to public officials when they act as an “arm of th
Badger v. Paulson Investment Co., Inc.public domain
784 P.2d 125 (1989) 100 Or.App. 12 H. Raymond and Kirsten BADGER, Lewis F. Bayer, Robert W. and Gayle J. Bearden, John O. Beirwagen, William P. Bingham, Rodger and Janet Eddy, John Elwick, Allan W. Furney, Ellen Givens, Charles and Betty Goff, John and Sylvia Greene, Don Gregory, Edgar Limp, and Fred L. Stallard, Appellants, Tinker and Entzel, Plaintiffs, v. PAULSON INVESTMENT COMPANY, Inc., an Oregon Corporation; and
Badger v. Paulson Investment Co., Inc.public domain
803 P.2d 1178 (1991) 311 Or. 14 H. Raymond and Kirsten BADGER, Lewis F. Bayer, Robert W. and Gayle J. Bearden, John O. Beirwagen, William P. Bingham, Rodger and Janet Eddy, John Elwick, Allan W. Furney, Ellen Givens, Charles and Betty Goff, John and Sylvia Greene, Don Gregory, Edgar Limp, and Fred L. Stallard, Respondents on review, Tinker and Entzel, Plaintiffs, v. PAULSON INVESTMENT COMPANY, INC., an Oregon corporati
Portland Public Sch. v. Portland Custodianpublic domain
108 P.3d 63 (2005) 198 Or. App. 11 PORTLAND PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1J, an Oregon Public School District, Respondent, v. PORTLAND CUSTODIAN CIVIL SERVICE BOARD, an Oregon Civil Service Board, Defendant, and Donald W. Strong, David P. Vecsi, Lynda M. Anderson, Mary J. Anderson, Robert L. Anderson, Steven R. Armony, Glenn E. Armstrong, Wayne L. Arneson, Daniel Arnold, Phillip L. Bartlett, William K. Beatty, Patrick S.
If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS DAVID KRIEGER, ANDREW KRIEGER, JAMES FOR PUBLICATION SPERLING, and MARGARET SPERLING, on September 7, 2023 Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly 9:05 a.m. Si
Georgine v. Amchem Products, Inc.public domain
878 F.Supp. 716 (1994) Robert A. GEORGINE, et al., on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC., et al., Defendants, and Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. ADMIRAL INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Third-Party Defendants. Civ. A. No. 93-0215. United States District Court, for the E.D. Pennsylvania. September 21, 1994. Ord
IN RE: Administrative Suspension Pursuant to Rule 219 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Disciplinary Enforcementpublic domain
NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. The current license status of a Pennsylvania attorney can be found on the Disciplinary Board’s website. https://www.padisciplinaryboard.org/for-the- public/find-attorney Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Attorneys Certified for Administrative Suspensi
Badger v. Paulson Investment Co., Inc.public domain
779 P.2d 1046 (1989) 98 Or.App. 200 H. Raymond, and Kirsten BADGER, Lewis F. Bayer, Robert W. and Gayle J. Bearden, John O. Beirwagen, William P. Bingham, Rodger and Janet Eddy, John Elwick, Allan W. Furney, Ellen Givens, Charles and Betty Goff, John and Sylvia Greene, Don Gregory, Edgar Limp, and Fred L. Stallard, Appellants, Tinker and Entzel, Plaintiffs, v. PAULSON INVESTMENT COMPANY, Inc., an Oregon Corporation; an
City of Dallas, Texas v. Willis, Kevin Michaelpublic domain
Affirm in part; Reverse and Render in part; Remand and Opinion Filed August 13, 2013 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas __________________________________ NO. 05-12-00963-CV CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, Appellant V. ANTHONY ARREDONDO, CHARLES S. SWANER, JAM
City of Dallas, Texas v. Arredondo, Anthonypublic domain
Affirm in part; Reverse and Render in part; Remand and Opinion Filed August 13, 2013 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas __________________________________ NO. 05-12-00963-CV CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, Appellant V. ANTHONY ARREDONDO, CHARLES S. SWANER, JAM
People v. Kraftpublic domain
99 Cal.Rptr.2d 1 (2000) 23 Cal.4th 978 5 P.3d 68 The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Randy Steven KRAFT, Defendant and Appellant. No. S013187. Supreme Court of California. August 10, 2000. Rehearing Denied October 18, 2000. *15 Richard Power, Berkeley, and Eliz
Maestas v. Hallpublic domain
274 P.3d 66 (2012) 2012-NMSC-006 Antonio MAESTAS and Brian Franklin Egolf, Jr., members of the New Mexico House of Representatives, and June Lorenzo, Alvin Warren, Eloise Gift and Henry Ochoa, Petitioners, v. Hon. James A. HALL, District Judge Pro Tempore of the First Judicial District Court, Respondent, and Susana Martinez, in her capacity as Governor of New Mexico, et al., Real Parties in Interest, and Maurilio C
Murrell v. Murrellpublic domain
BEJACH, J. This cause involves an effort by Leo Marshall Murrell, who was divorced from the appellee, Frances May Murrell, by a decree of absolute divorce granted in the Circuit Court of Shelby County, Tennessee, November 30, 1956, to have that decree set aside and declared null and void. For that purpose, on March 17, 1958, he filed a petition in the cause in which the divorce decree had been entered, same being Number 71466 R.D
Georgine v. Amchem Products, Inc.public domain
*485 MEMORANDUM LOWELL A. REED, Jr., District Judge. Pending before me is the joint motion of the settling parties for an order establishing a second notice and opt-out period for class members who have requested exclusion from the class, in order to remedy improper communications by counsel opposing the settlement (“settling parties’ joint
OPINION OF THE COURT Per Curiam. Section 468-a of the Judiciary Law requires every resident and nonresident attorney admitted to practice in the State of New York to file a biennial registration statement with the administrative office of the courts. A biennial registration fee must be paid at the time the statement is filed. This registration statement, which is mailed every two years by the Office of Co
Albright v. United Statespublic domain
ORDER YOCK, Judge. This civilian overtime and premium pay dispute is before the Court on the defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction filed on June 4, 1990. For the reasons stated herein, defendant’s motion is granted in part and denied in part. Facts All the plaintiffs in this case are guards employed by the United States Department of
Stastny v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.public domain
458 F.Supp. 314 (1978) Marguerite STASTNY, Plaintiff, v. SOUTHERN BELL TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, Defendant. Lillie ANDREWS, Plaintiff, v. SOUTHERN BELL TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, Defendant. Texie SPRINGS, Plaintiff, v. SOUTHERN BELL TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, Defendant. Mary ROGERS, Plaintiff, v. SOUTHERN BELL TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, Defendant. Nos. C-C-75-22, C