Cases

Filed 4/3/20; Certified for Publication 4/30/20 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Sacramento) ---- In re JONATHAN HAMPTON on Habeas Corpus. C087151 (Super. Ct. No. 14HC00477

K. K. HALL, Circuit Judge: William Keith Jenkins was convicted of conducting an illegal gambling business in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1955. Jenkins raises several issues on appeal but primarily contends that the government’s proof failed to meet the requirement of 18 U.S.C. § 1955(b)(1)(H) that the illegal gambling business involve five or more persons. We find that the governme

Filed 4/7/20 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO JENNIFER K., Plaintiff and Appellant, A155111 v. SHANE K., (San Francisco County Super. Ct. No. FDV-17-813669) Defendant and Respondent.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOSEPH F. BIANCO, District Judge: On June 22 and September 14, 2009, individuals acting at the direction of the Town of East Hampton (the “Town”) entered plaintiff Thomas Ferreira’s (“plaintiff’ or “Ferreira”) property located at 63 Navy Road in Montauk, New York (the “Property”) and removed many unregistered and inoperative vehicles, tools, and other items. The Town was acting pursuant

327 S.W.3d 743 (2010) HAMPTON-VAUGHAN FUNERAL HOME, Hampton-Vaughan Funeral Directors, Hampton-Vaughan Funeral Directors, Inc., Sci Funeral Services of Texas, Inc., Hampton-Vaughan Crestview Memoria, Sci Texas Funeral Services, Inc., and Crestview Memorial Park, Appellants, v. Beverly N. BRISCOE, Don I. Briscoe, Jr., Rebecca L. Llenas, Lori K. Morrow, Cherl L. Teague, Thomas E. Briscoe, and Anna M. Evans, Appellees. No. 2-09

ACCEPTED 14-17-01010-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 5/16/2018 4:34 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-09-057-CV HAMPTON-VAUGHAN FUNERAL APPELLANTS HOME, HAMPTON-VAUGHAN FUNERAL DIRECTORS, HAMPTON- VAUGHAN FUNERAL DIRECTORS, INC., SCI FUNERAL SERVICES OF TEXAS, INC., HAMPTON-VAUGHAN CRESTVIEW MEMORIA, SCI TEXAS FUNERAL SERVICES, INC., AND CRESTVIEW MEMORIAL PARK V.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2024-KA-00511-COA JEFFREY PICKETT A/K/A JEFFERY PICKETT APPELLANT v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/27/2024 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. CHARLES E. WEBSTER COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: TUNICA COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEYS FOR APPE

02-09-057-CV COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTR

IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2022 WY 26 OCTOBER TERM, A.D. 2021 February 18, 2022 JOHN DAVID MORRISON, Appellant (Defendant), v. S-21-0126 PEGGY SUE RUBIO f/k/a PEGGY SUE MORRISON, Appellee (Pl

969 S.W.2d 503 (1998) Gregory John MAYHUE, a/k/a Farrell, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. Nos. 03-96-00444-CR, 03-96-00445-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Austin. May 7, 1998. *504 Keith S. Hampton, Austin, for appellant. Ken Anderson, Dist. Atty., John M. Bradley, Asst. Dist. Atty., Georgetown, for state. <

The appellant was adjudicated delinquent on the underlying offenses of possessing a pistol about his person on premises not his own or under his control, a violation of § 13A-11-52, Code of Alabama 1975, and of receiving stolen property in the second degree, a violation of § 13A-8-18, Code of Alabama 1975. He was committed to the Department of Youth Services. The appellant presents three issues on appeal.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court Willie Homer Stephens, Guardian ad Litem for Lillian C., a minor, Petitioner, v. CSX Transportation, Inc. and South Carolina Department of Transportation, Respondents. Appellate Case No. 2013-000133 ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS Appeal From Hampton County Carmen T. Mullen, Circuit Court Judge Opinion No. 27587

Judgment rendered August 10, 2022. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 54,258-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA

262 F.3d 286 (4th Cir. 2001) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.LUCIEN ANTONIO ROBERTS, a/k/a Lou, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.PEDRO SANTOS, JR., Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.DARRELL ANTONIO GUMBS, a/k/a Kyle, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.AARON KEITH COVINGTON, a/k/a A-Man, Defend

OPINION SUSANO, J. The plaintiff, William George Baltrip (“Baltrip”), brought this action against Roy K. Norris (“Norris”), Superintendent of the Claiborne County Schools, and the Claiborne County Board of Education (“the Board”) seeking reinstatement to his position as a tenured teacher in the Claiborne County School System pursuant to T.C.A. § 49-5-513.1 The trial court gran

277 F.3d 454 (4th Cir. 2002) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.MICHAEL ALAN LEVENITE, a/k/a Nomad, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.MICHAEL ALAN LEVENITE, a/k/a Nomad, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.TRAVIS CHAD DAILEY, a/k/a "Taz", Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.RICHARD FREDERICK CONNOR,

148 F.Supp.2d 110 (2001) Bertrand CABANA, Plaintiff, v. Keith L. FORCIER, KNA Trucking Co., Inc., Dart Trucking Co., Inc., DartAmericA, Inc., and Ensco, Inc., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 99-40071-NMG. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. June 20, 2001. *111 Jacques G. Simon, Anderson & Simon, New York City, Preston W. H

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GORTON, District Judge. Plaintiff, Bertrand Cabana (“Cabana”), commenced this suit on April 8, 1999, to recover damages for injuries allegedly caused by exposure to hazardous waste. Now pending before this Court are motions to amend the complaint and the answers of two of the defendants as well as numerous discovery-related motions. I. Background Working

Keith A. Howard, G. Houston Howard II, Hal Ray Howard, George P. Howard, Donald W. Schulz, and Alice E. Schulz (Howard plaintiffs) filed a complaint against Donald E. Bullock in the Coosa County Circuit Court, seeking a declaratory judgment of their rights to use an easement across Bullock's real property. Bullock answered, asserting various affirmative defenses. Thereafter, the Howard plaintiffs amended their complaint, asserting that they owned an easement by prescription, im